Women in Anaesthesia and Critical Care: a narrative review of their impact on Patient Care, Research Innovation, and Team Performance.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anne Godier, Aurélie Gouel-Chéron, Anne-Claire Lukaszewicz
{"title":"Women in Anaesthesia and Critical Care: a narrative review of their impact on Patient Care, Research Innovation, and Team Performance.","authors":"Anne Godier, Aurélie Gouel-Chéron, Anne-Claire Lukaszewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the growing proportion of female doctors, gender imbalance persists in Anaesthesia and Critical Care (ACC).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide an overview of gender imbalance incidence and consequences in ACC, focusing on the impact of female ACC physicians on patient care, research, and team performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Narrative review based on a comprehensive search on gender parity performed using Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar.</p><p><strong>Main findings: </strong>Several high-level studies show that female physicians consistently achieve better patient outcomes, with greater benefits for female patients. In research, female ACC physicians contribute significantly to women's health: female-led teams are more likely to include women in clinical trials and to analyse gender-disaggregated data, leading to improved medical knowledge for women. The presence of female ACC physicians also improves global team performance: medical teams with more female physicians report better patient outcomes overall, and gender-balanced research teams produce more innovative and impactful studies. In leadership roles, women drive better team engagement and decision-making, improving individual, team, and organisational performance. Finally, increasing the proportion of female physicians in ACC creates a virtuous circle by improving the recruitment of women into clinical and academic positions. Various measures have been reported to improve gender balance, particularly in institutional programmes. Artificial Intelligence, if not carefully managed, risks reinforcing gender biases, highlighting the need for ethical algorithm development.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gender parity in ACC is a critical factor in improving medical care, research, and team performance. Achieving parity will lead to a more efficient healthcare system that benefits patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101612"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the growing proportion of female doctors, gender imbalance persists in Anaesthesia and Critical Care (ACC).

Purpose: To provide an overview of gender imbalance incidence and consequences in ACC, focusing on the impact of female ACC physicians on patient care, research, and team performance.

Methods: Narrative review based on a comprehensive search on gender parity performed using Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar.

Main findings: Several high-level studies show that female physicians consistently achieve better patient outcomes, with greater benefits for female patients. In research, female ACC physicians contribute significantly to women's health: female-led teams are more likely to include women in clinical trials and to analyse gender-disaggregated data, leading to improved medical knowledge for women. The presence of female ACC physicians also improves global team performance: medical teams with more female physicians report better patient outcomes overall, and gender-balanced research teams produce more innovative and impactful studies. In leadership roles, women drive better team engagement and decision-making, improving individual, team, and organisational performance. Finally, increasing the proportion of female physicians in ACC creates a virtuous circle by improving the recruitment of women into clinical and academic positions. Various measures have been reported to improve gender balance, particularly in institutional programmes. Artificial Intelligence, if not carefully managed, risks reinforcing gender biases, highlighting the need for ethical algorithm development.

Conclusions: Gender parity in ACC is a critical factor in improving medical care, research, and team performance. Achieving parity will lead to a more efficient healthcare system that benefits patients.

麻醉和重症监护中的女性:她们对患者护理、研究创新和团队绩效影响的叙述性回顾。
背景:尽管女医生的比例越来越大,但在麻醉和危重病护理(ACC)中性别失衡仍然存在。目的:概述ACC中性别失衡的发生率和后果,重点关注女性ACC医师对患者护理、研究和团队绩效的影响。方法:基于Medline/PubMed、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar对性别平等进行的综合检索的叙述性综述。主要发现:几项高水平的研究表明,女性医生始终能取得更好的患者治疗效果,对女性患者有更大的好处。在研究方面,行政协调委员会的女性医生对妇女的健康作出了重大贡献:女性领导的小组更有可能让妇女参加临床试验,并分析按性别分列的数据,从而提高妇女的医学知识。女性ACC医生的存在也提高了全球团队的绩效:女性医生更多的医疗团队总体上报告了更好的患者结果,性别平衡的研究团队产生了更多创新和有影响力的研究。在领导角色中,女性推动了更好的团队参与和决策,提高了个人、团队和组织的绩效。最后,增加ACC中女医生的比例,通过提高女性进入临床和学术职位的招聘,形成良性循环。据报告已采取各种措施改善性别平衡,特别是在机构方案中。人工智能如果管理不当,就有可能加剧性别偏见,这凸显了开发合乎道德的算法的必要性。结论:ACC的性别平等是改善医疗服务、研究和团队绩效的关键因素。实现平等将导致一个更有效的医疗保健系统,使患者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信