A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safe Distance Beyond the Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon and the Application of the Safe Arthroscopic Approach to Prevent Neurovascular Injury in Posterior Ankle Arthroscopy.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Penpun Lertwattanachai, Thos Harnroongroj, Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong, Theerawoot Tharmviboonsri, Nuntich Singsumpun, Ishthayapong Kanjanakeereewong
{"title":"A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safe Distance Beyond the Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon and the Application of the Safe Arthroscopic Approach to Prevent Neurovascular Injury in Posterior Ankle Arthroscopy.","authors":"Penpun Lertwattanachai, Thos Harnroongroj, Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong, Theerawoot Tharmviboonsri, Nuntich Singsumpun, Ishthayapong Kanjanakeereewong","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon is used as a medial landmark for posterior ankle arthroscopy. However, some posterior ankle pathologies require working medial to the FHL. The safe distance beyond the FHL to the neurovascular bundle has never been established.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report the safe distances beyond the FHL and neurovascular bundle and the incidence of neurovascular injury after using \"safe arthroscopic approach\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 63 MRIs with posterior ankle pathologies were included. Measurements were the FHL-tibial nerve (TN) and FHL-posterior tibial artery (PTA) distances at the level of fibular tip, 1.2 cm above and 1.2 cm below. Twenty FHL tenosynovitis patients underwent arthroscopic debridement utilizing a safe arthroscopic approach developed by the authors based on the MRI findings. The incidence of neurovascular injury and clinical outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The closest mean (standard deviation, SD) distances of FHL-TN and FHL-PTA were 2.14 (0.81) mm and 5.23 (2.11) mm. The incidence of neurovascular injury after using \"safe arthroscopic approach\" was 1/20. The NRS for pain during activity daily living (ADL) and FAAM for ADL were statistically improved at 6-month follow-up from 6.36 (1.50) to 1.14 (1.29) and 72.4 (5.78) to 89.4 (7.96), p<0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated close margins between the FHL and the TN and PTA of 2.14 mm and 5.23 mm. The \"safe arthroscopic approach\" for arthroscopic FHL debridement had a TN injury incidence of 1/20 which was equivalent to previous reported incidences of the arthroscopic surgery which did not go beyond FHL.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.09.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon is used as a medial landmark for posterior ankle arthroscopy. However, some posterior ankle pathologies require working medial to the FHL. The safe distance beyond the FHL to the neurovascular bundle has never been established.

Purpose: To report the safe distances beyond the FHL and neurovascular bundle and the incidence of neurovascular injury after using "safe arthroscopic approach".

Methods: The 63 MRIs with posterior ankle pathologies were included. Measurements were the FHL-tibial nerve (TN) and FHL-posterior tibial artery (PTA) distances at the level of fibular tip, 1.2 cm above and 1.2 cm below. Twenty FHL tenosynovitis patients underwent arthroscopic debridement utilizing a safe arthroscopic approach developed by the authors based on the MRI findings. The incidence of neurovascular injury and clinical outcomes were assessed.

Results: The closest mean (standard deviation, SD) distances of FHL-TN and FHL-PTA were 2.14 (0.81) mm and 5.23 (2.11) mm. The incidence of neurovascular injury after using "safe arthroscopic approach" was 1/20. The NRS for pain during activity daily living (ADL) and FAAM for ADL were statistically improved at 6-month follow-up from 6.36 (1.50) to 1.14 (1.29) and 72.4 (5.78) to 89.4 (7.96), p<0.001.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated close margins between the FHL and the TN and PTA of 2.14 mm and 5.23 mm. The "safe arthroscopic approach" for arthroscopic FHL debridement had a TN injury incidence of 1/20 which was equivalent to previous reported incidences of the arthroscopic surgery which did not go beyond FHL.

磁共振成像幻觉长屈肌腱安全距离及安全关节镜入路预防后踝关节镜神经血管损伤的应用。
背景:拇长屈肌(FHL)肌腱被用作后踝关节镜的内侧标志。然而,一些踝关节后病变需要在FHL内侧工作。从FHL到神经血管束的安全距离从未确定过。目的:报道“安全关节镜入路”手术后FHL及神经血管束外的安全距离及神经血管损伤的发生率。方法:对63例有后踝病变的mri进行分析。测量fhl -胫骨神经(TN)和fhl -胫骨后动脉(PTA)在腓骨尖端水平的距离,上面1.2 cm和下面1.2 cm。20例FHL腱鞘炎患者接受关节镜清创,采用作者基于MRI发现开发的安全关节镜方法。评估神经血管损伤的发生率和临床结果。结果:FHL-TN和FHL-PTA最接近的平均(标准差,SD)距离分别为2.14 (0.81)mm和5.23 (2.11)mm,经“安全关节镜入路”后神经血管损伤发生率为1/20。在6个月的随访中,活动日常生活疼痛(ADL)的NRS和FAAM从6.36(1.50)提高到1.14(1.29),从72.4(5.78)提高到89.4(7.96),具有统计学意义。结论:本研究显示FHL与TN和PTA的差值分别为2.14 mm和5.23 mm。关节镜下FHL清创的“安全关节镜入路”的TN损伤发生率为1/20,与先前报道的未超出FHL的关节镜手术的发生率相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信