Various acupuncture therapies for managing nonspecific low back pain: a network Meta-analysis.

Guo Jixing, J I Changchun, Xie Chaoju, Rao Xiang, Sun Zhangyin, Xing Yu, Zhang Rongni, Q U Qiangqiang, Dong Youpeng, Yang Jinsheng
{"title":"Various acupuncture therapies for managing nonspecific low back pain: a network Meta-analysis.","authors":"Guo Jixing, J I Changchun, Xie Chaoju, Rao Xiang, Sun Zhangyin, Xing Yu, Zhang Rongni, Q U Qiangqiang, Dong Youpeng, Yang Jinsheng","doi":"10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the therapeutic effects of nine acupuncture-related therapies (acupuncture, scrapping therapy, catgut embedding, blood-letting, electro-acupuncture, warm acupuncture, cupping, moxibustion, and needle knife) in the treatment of nonspecific low back pain (NLBP), providing evidence-based medical support for clinical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials evaluating various acupuncture therapies for NLBP were screened from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane 5.1.0 risk of bias assessment tool, and the data were analyzed using STATA 15.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 19 randomized controlled trials involving 1356 participants and assessing pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), improvement in dysfunction using the oswestry disability index (ODI), and the effective rate. Blood-letting [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 81.4] exhibited a significant clinical effect in relieving NLBP in studies with the VAS score as the outcome indicator, followed by cupping (SUCRA = 70.4) and moxibustion (SUCRA = 58.5). Scrapping therapy (SUCRA = 77.7) had the most significant effect on improving NLBP-related functional impairment, followed by moxibustion (SUCRA = 59.8), and then bloodletting (SUCRA = 58.2). The effective rates of warm acupuncture (SUCRA = 78.0), scrapping therapy (SUCRA = 77.2) and blood-letting (SUCRA = 58.6) were better than those of acupuncture (SUCRA = 12.0), especially for cold and wet NLBP. These findings demonstrate the importance of syndrome differentiation during clinical decision making when determining diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blood-letting was the most effective treatment for relieving pain, and scrapping therapy was the most effective treatment for improving dysfunction. Warm acupuncture was the preferred treatment for cold and wet NLBP. However, further high-quality clinical studies are needed for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan","volume":"45 5","pages":"954-962"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2025.05.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the therapeutic effects of nine acupuncture-related therapies (acupuncture, scrapping therapy, catgut embedding, blood-letting, electro-acupuncture, warm acupuncture, cupping, moxibustion, and needle knife) in the treatment of nonspecific low back pain (NLBP), providing evidence-based medical support for clinical treatment.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials evaluating various acupuncture therapies for NLBP were screened from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane 5.1.0 risk of bias assessment tool, and the data were analyzed using STATA 15.1.

Results: This study included 19 randomized controlled trials involving 1356 participants and assessing pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), improvement in dysfunction using the oswestry disability index (ODI), and the effective rate. Blood-letting [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 81.4] exhibited a significant clinical effect in relieving NLBP in studies with the VAS score as the outcome indicator, followed by cupping (SUCRA = 70.4) and moxibustion (SUCRA = 58.5). Scrapping therapy (SUCRA = 77.7) had the most significant effect on improving NLBP-related functional impairment, followed by moxibustion (SUCRA = 59.8), and then bloodletting (SUCRA = 58.2). The effective rates of warm acupuncture (SUCRA = 78.0), scrapping therapy (SUCRA = 77.2) and blood-letting (SUCRA = 58.6) were better than those of acupuncture (SUCRA = 12.0), especially for cold and wet NLBP. These findings demonstrate the importance of syndrome differentiation during clinical decision making when determining diagnosis and treatment.

Conclusion: Blood-letting was the most effective treatment for relieving pain, and scrapping therapy was the most effective treatment for improving dysfunction. Warm acupuncture was the preferred treatment for cold and wet NLBP. However, further high-quality clinical studies are needed for validation.

多种针灸疗法治疗非特异性腰痛:网络荟萃分析。
目的:比较针刺、刮痧、埋线、放血、电针、温针、拔火罐、艾灸、针刀等九种针灸相关疗法治疗非特异性腰痛(NLBP)的疗效,为临床治疗提供循证医学支持。方法:从中国国家知识基础数据库、万方数据库、中国科技期刊数据库、PubMed、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中筛选评价各种针灸疗法治疗NLBP的随机对照试验。采用Cochrane 5.1.0偏倚风险评估工具评价方法学质量,采用STATA 15.1对资料进行分析。结果:本研究纳入19项随机对照试验,共1356名受试者,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛,采用oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估功能障碍改善情况,以及有效率。以VAS评分为结局指标的研究中,放血[累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA) = 81.4]在缓解NLBP方面表现出显著的临床效果,拔罐(SUCRA = 70.4)和艾灸(SUCRA = 58.5)次之。刮痧治疗(SUCRA = 77.7)对nlbp相关功能损害的改善效果最显著,其次是艾灸(SUCRA = 59.8),放血(SUCRA = 58.2)。温针(SUCRA = 78.0)、刮痧法(SUCRA = 77.2)和放血法(SUCRA = 58.6)的有效率均优于针刺法(SUCRA = 12.0),尤其对寒湿型NLBP疗效显著。这些发现表明辨证在临床决策时确定诊断和治疗的重要性。结论:放血是缓解疼痛最有效的治疗方法,刮痧是改善功能障碍最有效的治疗方法。温针是治疗寒湿性腰痛的首选方法。然而,需要进一步的高质量临床研究来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信