[Patterns of bilateral nasal airflow distribution and influencing factors in patients with obstructive sleep apnea].

Q4 Medicine
Y H Shi, Y R Li, J H Liao, W Xu, D M Han
{"title":"[Patterns of bilateral nasal airflow distribution and influencing factors in patients with obstructive sleep apnea].","authors":"Y H Shi, Y R Li, J H Liao, W Xu, D M Han","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250110-00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the characteristics of the nasal cycle and the patterns of bilateral nasal airflow distribution in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 29 healthy subjects (control group: 16 males, 13 females; age range 23-60 years, mean 31.03±8.67 years) and 41 patients with OSA (OSA group: 34 males, 7 females; age range 20-62 years, mean 39.73±11.27 years) who visited the Sleep Medicine Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, between March 2022 and April 2025. Whole-night split-channel nasal airflow and polysomnography were performed to calculate nasal airflow laterality, nasal cycle duration, and the effects of severity, sleep stages, and body position on bilateral nasal airflow distribution during sleep were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> The nasal cycle duration in OSA patients was significantly shorter than in controls (179.5 min <i>vs</i>. 312.5 min, <i>χ<sup>2</sup></i>=14.01, <i>P</i><0.001). Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and age were independent influencing factors. In the OSA group, the incidence of nasal cycle transitions within 10 minutes after wake [(observed)7/50 <i>vs.</i> 2/55(expected), <i>χ<sup>2</sup></i>=14.32, <i>P</i><0.001], REM sleep [(observed)23/34 <i>vs.</i> 14/43(expected), <i>χ<sup>2</sup></i>=8.14, <i>P</i>=0.004], and position changes (21/36 <i>vs.</i> 11/46, <i>χ<sup>2</sup></i>=12.02, <i>P</i><0.001) was higher, while, in the control group, it was only associated with REM sleep (15/15 <i>vs.</i> 8/22, <i>χ<sup>2</sup></i>=8.80, <i>P</i>=0.003). Nasal airflow lateralization in the OSA group showed a stronger correlation with body position. The nasal airflow lateralization in the supine position was significantly lower in OSA patients than in controls [REM stage: 0.626 (0.425, 0.743) <i>vs.</i> 0.781 (0.706, 0.857), <i>Z</i>=3.62, <i>P</i><0.001; N3 stage: 0.526 (0.438, 0.600) <i>vs</i>. 0.716 (0.608, 0.853), <i>Z</i>=2.17, <i>P</i>=0.032; N1/2 stage: 0.702 (0.526, 0.787) <i>vs</i>. 0.747 (0.663, 0.820), <i>Z</i>=1.68, <i>P</i>=0.095]. Multiple linear regression revealed that AHI explained 31.3% of the variance in nasal airflow lateralization during supine REM sleep. <b>Conclusions:</b> The nasal airflow regulation during sleep in OSA patients differs from that in healthy individuals. Compared with healthy subjects, OSA patients exhibit shorter nasal cycle durations, reduced nasal airflow lateralization in the supine position, and a higher likelihood of nasal cycle transitions triggered by position changes or arousal. Healthy subjects demonstrate high and stable nasal airflow asymmetry during sleep, with minimal influence from sleep stages or body position.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"60 ","pages":"1111-1118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250110-00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the characteristics of the nasal cycle and the patterns of bilateral nasal airflow distribution in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 29 healthy subjects (control group: 16 males, 13 females; age range 23-60 years, mean 31.03±8.67 years) and 41 patients with OSA (OSA group: 34 males, 7 females; age range 20-62 years, mean 39.73±11.27 years) who visited the Sleep Medicine Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, between March 2022 and April 2025. Whole-night split-channel nasal airflow and polysomnography were performed to calculate nasal airflow laterality, nasal cycle duration, and the effects of severity, sleep stages, and body position on bilateral nasal airflow distribution during sleep were analyzed. Results: The nasal cycle duration in OSA patients was significantly shorter than in controls (179.5 min vs. 312.5 min, χ2=14.01, P<0.001). Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and age were independent influencing factors. In the OSA group, the incidence of nasal cycle transitions within 10 minutes after wake [(observed)7/50 vs. 2/55(expected), χ2=14.32, P<0.001], REM sleep [(observed)23/34 vs. 14/43(expected), χ2=8.14, P=0.004], and position changes (21/36 vs. 11/46, χ2=12.02, P<0.001) was higher, while, in the control group, it was only associated with REM sleep (15/15 vs. 8/22, χ2=8.80, P=0.003). Nasal airflow lateralization in the OSA group showed a stronger correlation with body position. The nasal airflow lateralization in the supine position was significantly lower in OSA patients than in controls [REM stage: 0.626 (0.425, 0.743) vs. 0.781 (0.706, 0.857), Z=3.62, P<0.001; N3 stage: 0.526 (0.438, 0.600) vs. 0.716 (0.608, 0.853), Z=2.17, P=0.032; N1/2 stage: 0.702 (0.526, 0.787) vs. 0.747 (0.663, 0.820), Z=1.68, P=0.095]. Multiple linear regression revealed that AHI explained 31.3% of the variance in nasal airflow lateralization during supine REM sleep. Conclusions: The nasal airflow regulation during sleep in OSA patients differs from that in healthy individuals. Compared with healthy subjects, OSA patients exhibit shorter nasal cycle durations, reduced nasal airflow lateralization in the supine position, and a higher likelihood of nasal cycle transitions triggered by position changes or arousal. Healthy subjects demonstrate high and stable nasal airflow asymmetry during sleep, with minimal influence from sleep stages or body position.

[阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者双侧鼻腔气流分布规律及影响因素]。
目的:探讨阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者鼻循环特征及双侧鼻腔气流分布规律。方法:本横断面研究分析了2022年3月至2025年4月在首都医科大学附属北京铜人医院睡眠医学中心就诊的29例健康受试者(对照组:男性16例,女性13例,年龄23 ~ 60岁,平均31.03±8.67岁)和41例OSA患者(OSA组:男性34例,女性7例,年龄20 ~ 62岁,平均39.73±11.27岁)的资料。采用分道鼻腔气流和多导睡眠图计算患者的鼻腔气流偏侧度、鼻循环持续时间,并分析严重程度、睡眠阶段和体位对睡眠时双侧鼻腔气流分布的影响。结果:OSA患者鼻循环时间明显短于对照组(179.5 min vs. 312.5 min, χ2=14.01, χ2= 2/55(预期),χ2=14.32, χ 14/43(预期),χ2=8.14, P=0.004),体位变化明显短于对照组(21/36 vs. 11/46, χ2=12.02, χ 8/22, χ2=8.80, P=0.003)。OSA组鼻气流偏侧与体位的相关性更强。OSA患者仰卧位鼻气流偏侧度明显低于对照组[REM期:0.626(0.425,0.743)比0.781 (0.706,0.857),Z=3.62, pv = 0.716 (0.608, 0.853), Z=2.17, P=0.032;N1/2期:0.702 (0.526,0.787)vs. 0.747 (0.663, 0.820), Z=1.68, P=0.095]。多元线性回归显示,AHI解释了仰卧位快速眼动睡眠期间31.3%的鼻气流偏侧变异。结论:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者睡眠时鼻腔气流调节与正常人不同。与健康受试者相比,OSA患者的鼻周期持续时间更短,仰卧位时鼻腔气流偏侧减少,体位变化或唤醒引发鼻周期转变的可能性更高。健康受试者在睡眠时鼻腔气流高度且稳定不对称,受睡眠阶段或体位影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12432
期刊介绍: Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal. Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields. Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信