Quality of Life and Postoperative Complications of Single- or Bilateral-Stoma Cutaneous Ureterostomy Compared to Ileal Conduit After Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Marvel Pratama Tjiaman, Muhammad Zen Zaidan, Zidan Fawwaz Ausath, Aurellie Tabitha Putri, Anneta Sanjaya Tjiaman, Armand Achmadsyah, Ervita Mediana, Agus Rizal Ardy Hariandy Hamid
{"title":"Quality of Life and Postoperative Complications of Single- or Bilateral-Stoma Cutaneous Ureterostomy Compared to Ileal Conduit After Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Marvel Pratama Tjiaman, Muhammad Zen Zaidan, Zidan Fawwaz Ausath, Aurellie Tabitha Putri, Anneta Sanjaya Tjiaman, Armand Achmadsyah, Ervita Mediana, Agus Rizal Ardy Hariandy Hamid","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare postoperative complications and quality of life among patients undergoing ileal conduit (IC), single-stoma cutaneous ureterostomy (SSCU), and bilateral-stoma cutaneous ureterostomy (BSCU) following radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Method This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 6.2 and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, Wiley, and Scopus starting from 11 April 2025.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. IC showed significantly better physical QoL based on FACT scores (SMD: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.02-1.24; p = 0.04), particularly compared to BSCU (MD: 18.43; p < 0.0001), with no significant difference versus SSCU. However, IC had a higher risk of wound infection (OR: 3.02; p = 0.004) and early pyelonephritis (OR: 3.04; p = 0.02), especially when compared to SSCU. No significant differences were observed in ileus or wound dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IC may offer better physical QoL, particularly over BSCU. However, SSCU offers similar QoL with lower rates of infection and pyelonephritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare postoperative complications and quality of life among patients undergoing ileal conduit (IC), single-stoma cutaneous ureterostomy (SSCU), and bilateral-stoma cutaneous ureterostomy (BSCU) following radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Method This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 6.2 and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, Wiley, and Scopus starting from 11 April 2025.
Result: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. IC showed significantly better physical QoL based on FACT scores (SMD: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.02-1.24; p = 0.04), particularly compared to BSCU (MD: 18.43; p < 0.0001), with no significant difference versus SSCU. However, IC had a higher risk of wound infection (OR: 3.02; p = 0.004) and early pyelonephritis (OR: 3.04; p = 0.02), especially when compared to SSCU. No significant differences were observed in ileus or wound dehiscence.
Conclusion: IC may offer better physical QoL, particularly over BSCU. However, SSCU offers similar QoL with lower rates of infection and pyelonephritis.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.