Should recipient parents have access to gamete donors' raw genomic data? Clinical, legal, and ethical considerations.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Shiri Shkedi-Rafid, Aviad Raz, Maya Sabatello, Barbara Prainsack, Roy Gilbar
{"title":"Should recipient parents have access to gamete donors' raw genomic data? Clinical, legal, and ethical considerations.","authors":"Shiri Shkedi-Rafid, Aviad Raz, Maya Sabatello, Barbara Prainsack, Roy Gilbar","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03666-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genomic sequencing yields vast amounts of data, and the access of patients and research participants to their raw genomic data raises ethical and practical dilemmas.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper aims to examine a challenging, underexplored question: whether gamete donors' raw data should be provided to recipient parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a clinical case, we explore the key ethical, legal, and clinical implications of such access, weighing the advantages, disadvantages, and potential alternatives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ethical implications include the feasibility of meaningful informed consent from donors for complex genetic testing, sometimes years after donation; privacy considerations; the type of medical information recipients can or should hold on donors; potential conflicts of interest between the donor and the child; and the potential for raised costs and commercial interests. Clinical implications involve the implementation of systems of storing donors' raw data and devices of re-contacting past donors. Legal aspects include  the informed consent of gametes donors to disclose their raw data to recipient parents and privacy protections, including their right to keep their raw data in confidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We advocate a cautious approach that favors clinically mediated access over unrestricted parental access.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03666-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Genomic sequencing yields vast amounts of data, and the access of patients and research participants to their raw genomic data raises ethical and practical dilemmas.

Purpose: This paper aims to examine a challenging, underexplored question: whether gamete donors' raw data should be provided to recipient parents.

Methods: Using a clinical case, we explore the key ethical, legal, and clinical implications of such access, weighing the advantages, disadvantages, and potential alternatives.

Results: Ethical implications include the feasibility of meaningful informed consent from donors for complex genetic testing, sometimes years after donation; privacy considerations; the type of medical information recipients can or should hold on donors; potential conflicts of interest between the donor and the child; and the potential for raised costs and commercial interests. Clinical implications involve the implementation of systems of storing donors' raw data and devices of re-contacting past donors. Legal aspects include  the informed consent of gametes donors to disclose their raw data to recipient parents and privacy protections, including their right to keep their raw data in confidence.

Conclusion: We advocate a cautious approach that favors clinically mediated access over unrestricted parental access.

接受者父母是否有权获得配子捐赠者的原始基因组数据?临床、法律和伦理方面的考虑。
背景:基因组测序产生了大量的数据,而患者和研究参与者对其原始基因组数据的访问引发了伦理和实践上的困境。目的:本文旨在研究一个具有挑战性且未被充分探讨的问题:配子捐赠者的原始数据是否应该提供给接受者父母。方法:通过一个临床案例,我们探讨了这种途径的关键伦理、法律和临床意义,权衡利弊和潜在的替代方案。结果:伦理影响包括捐助者对复杂基因检测有意义的知情同意的可行性,有时在捐赠后数年;隐私的考虑;接受者可以或应该掌握的关于捐赠者的医疗信息类型;捐赠人与子女之间的潜在利益冲突;还有可能提高成本和商业利益。临床意义包括实施储存献血者原始数据的系统和重新联系过去献血者的装置。法律方面包括配子捐赠者知情同意向接受者父母披露他们的原始数据和隐私保护,包括他们对原始数据保密的权利。结论:我们提倡谨慎的方法,有利于临床介导的访问,而不是无限制的家长访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信