[Analysis of short-term efficacy and safety of transnasal endoscopic approach and the combined transconjunctival-endoscopic approach in resection of benign orbital apex lesions].

Q4 Medicine
Q Zuo, Z D Zhang, J C Zhou, H L Jiang, Y Wang, Y H Zhang
{"title":"[Analysis of short-term efficacy and safety of transnasal endoscopic approach and the combined transconjunctival-endoscopic approach in resection of benign orbital apex lesions].","authors":"Q Zuo, Z D Zhang, J C Zhou, H L Jiang, Y Wang, Y H Zhang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250329-00173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the early efficacy and safety of the exclusively transnasal endoscopic approach and the combined transconjunctival-endoscopic approach in the resection of benign orbital apex lesions. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on 51 patients who underwent transnasal endoscopic resection of benign lesions in the orbital apex at Peking University Third Hospital from May 2021 to December 2024. The study population was composed of 17 males and 34 females, with the age of (39.4±12.4) years (range: 4 to 65 years). Pathology diagnoses were identified as orbital cavernous hemangioma (OCH, <i>n</i>=38), schwannoma (<i>n</i>=8), solitary fibrous tumor (<i>n</i>=1), mucocele (<i>n</i>=1), optic nerve sheath meningioma (<i>n</i>=1), pseudotumor (<i>n</i>=1), and organized hematoma (<i>n</i>=1). Two surgical approaches were compared as the exclusively transnasal endoscopic resection (<i>n</i>=27) and the combined transconjunctival-endoscopic approach (combined approach, <i>n</i>=24). Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were conducted for the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field, intraocular pressure (IOP), and exophthalmos before and after surgery. Demographic characteristics, tumor features, and postoperative complications were analyzed between the two surgical groups. Differences in Orbital Resection by Intranasal Technique (ORBIT) stage between the two surgical approaches were analyzed. SPSS 27.0 software was used for statistical analysis. <b>Results:</b> Among the 51 patients, 3 schwannomas underwent intracapsular resection (1 via exclusively transnasal endoscopic approach, and 2 via combined approach), and the remaining 48 patients underwent complete tumor resection. Significant postoperative improvements were observed in BCVA, visual field, IOP and exophthalmos (<i>t</i> value was 2.96, 4.34, 4.85, and 4.63, respectively, all <i>P</i><0.05). The combined approach required longer operative time but showed comparable intraoperative blood loss. Tumors resected via the combined approach were larger in volume, though not statistically significant. Postoperative complications (e.g., diplopia, mydriasis) were more frequent in the combined approach group but resolved within a short-term period. There was no significant difference in ORBIT stage between the two groups (<i>P</i>=0.178). <b>Conclusions:</b> Both exclusively transnasal and combined transconjunctival-endoscopic approaches prove safe and effective for benign orbital apex lesions resection. The combined approach ensures complete tumor removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"60 ","pages":"1070-1077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250329-00173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the early efficacy and safety of the exclusively transnasal endoscopic approach and the combined transconjunctival-endoscopic approach in the resection of benign orbital apex lesions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 51 patients who underwent transnasal endoscopic resection of benign lesions in the orbital apex at Peking University Third Hospital from May 2021 to December 2024. The study population was composed of 17 males and 34 females, with the age of (39.4±12.4) years (range: 4 to 65 years). Pathology diagnoses were identified as orbital cavernous hemangioma (OCH, n=38), schwannoma (n=8), solitary fibrous tumor (n=1), mucocele (n=1), optic nerve sheath meningioma (n=1), pseudotumor (n=1), and organized hematoma (n=1). Two surgical approaches were compared as the exclusively transnasal endoscopic resection (n=27) and the combined transconjunctival-endoscopic approach (combined approach, n=24). Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were conducted for the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field, intraocular pressure (IOP), and exophthalmos before and after surgery. Demographic characteristics, tumor features, and postoperative complications were analyzed between the two surgical groups. Differences in Orbital Resection by Intranasal Technique (ORBIT) stage between the two surgical approaches were analyzed. SPSS 27.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Among the 51 patients, 3 schwannomas underwent intracapsular resection (1 via exclusively transnasal endoscopic approach, and 2 via combined approach), and the remaining 48 patients underwent complete tumor resection. Significant postoperative improvements were observed in BCVA, visual field, IOP and exophthalmos (t value was 2.96, 4.34, 4.85, and 4.63, respectively, all P<0.05). The combined approach required longer operative time but showed comparable intraoperative blood loss. Tumors resected via the combined approach were larger in volume, though not statistically significant. Postoperative complications (e.g., diplopia, mydriasis) were more frequent in the combined approach group but resolved within a short-term period. There was no significant difference in ORBIT stage between the two groups (P=0.178). Conclusions: Both exclusively transnasal and combined transconjunctival-endoscopic approaches prove safe and effective for benign orbital apex lesions resection. The combined approach ensures complete tumor removal.

[经鼻内镜入路与经结膜-内镜联合入路切除眼眶尖良性病变的近期疗效及安全性分析]。
目的:评价单纯经鼻内镜入路与经结膜-内镜联合入路在眼眶尖部良性病变切除术中的早期疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析北京大学第三医院于2021年5月至2024年12月行经鼻内镜眶尖良性病变切除术的51例患者。研究人群男性17人,女性34人,年龄(39.4±12.4)岁,年龄范围4 ~ 65岁。病理诊断为眼眶海绵状血管瘤(OCH, 38例)、神经鞘瘤(8例)、孤立性纤维瘤(1例)、黏液囊肿(1例)、视神经鞘脑膜瘤(1例)、假性瘤(1例)、组织性血肿(1例)。将两种手术入路进行比较,分别为单纯经鼻内镜切除(n=27)和经结膜-内镜联合入路(n= 24)。术前、术后对患者进行最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、视野、眼压(IOP)、手术前后突出度的评估。分析两组患者的人口学特征、肿瘤特征及术后并发症。分析两种手术入路鼻内眶切除术(ORBIT)分期的差异。采用SPSS 27.0软件进行统计分析。结果:51例患者中,3例神经鞘瘤行囊内切除术(1例单纯经鼻内镜入路,2例联合入路),其余48例患者行肿瘤全切除术。术后BCVA、视野、IOP、突出眼均有显著改善(t值分别为2.96、4.34、4.85、4.63,PP均=0.178)。结论:单纯经鼻入路和经结膜-内窥镜联合入路均可安全有效地切除良性眶尖病变。联合手术确保肿瘤完全切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12432
期刊介绍: Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal. Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields. Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信