Comparison of Early versus Late Exposure Methods of Dressing in the Healing of Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites in a Tertiary Hospital, Southeast, Nigeria.
A Ugbala, U U Nnadozie, C C Maduba, B O Okwara, E I Orji, A C Oguonu, O K Anthony, S E Omebe
{"title":"Comparison of Early versus Late Exposure Methods of Dressing in the Healing of Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites in a Tertiary Hospital, Southeast, Nigeria.","authors":"A Ugbala, U U Nnadozie, C C Maduba, B O Okwara, E I Orji, A C Oguonu, O K Anthony, S E Omebe","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_250_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is a veritable reconstructive option for covering skin and soft tissue defects but donor site management remains a challenge. Attempts to improve STSG donor site care have been made using different methods and various dressing agents; however, there is no consensus on the standard method of donor site care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to compare STSG healing rate using early versus late exposure of donor site dressing methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Southeast, Nigeria. Forty patients were recruited for the study and assigned to two groups of 20 patients each by a simple random sampling method. Group A had late exposure of the donor site dressing, whereas Group B had early exposure of the donor site dressing. The percentage re-epithelialization rate on the 14th day and the duration for complete re-epithelialization for both groups were calculated. The results were analyzed using International Business Machine Corporation, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Chicago Illinois, USA. (IBM SPSS) Statistics for Windows version 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The early exposure dressing method showed a faster re-epithelialization rate with a mean value of 98.15 (±4.92) compared with late exposure dressing methods with a mean rate of 70.95 (±13.22), which was statistically significant with a P value of 0.001. The duration for complete re-epithelialization was 13.80 (±4.63) days for the early exposure method and 29.40 (±6.25) days for the late exposure method. This is statistically significant with P < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Management of STSG donor site by early exposure of the donor site dressing is associated with increased re-epithelialization rate and shortened duration for complete donor site healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19431,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"28 9","pages":"1085-1089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_250_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is a veritable reconstructive option for covering skin and soft tissue defects but donor site management remains a challenge. Attempts to improve STSG donor site care have been made using different methods and various dressing agents; however, there is no consensus on the standard method of donor site care.
Aim: This study aims to compare STSG healing rate using early versus late exposure of donor site dressing methods.
Methods: This study was conducted in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Southeast, Nigeria. Forty patients were recruited for the study and assigned to two groups of 20 patients each by a simple random sampling method. Group A had late exposure of the donor site dressing, whereas Group B had early exposure of the donor site dressing. The percentage re-epithelialization rate on the 14th day and the duration for complete re-epithelialization for both groups were calculated. The results were analyzed using International Business Machine Corporation, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Chicago Illinois, USA. (IBM SPSS) Statistics for Windows version 26.
Results: The early exposure dressing method showed a faster re-epithelialization rate with a mean value of 98.15 (±4.92) compared with late exposure dressing methods with a mean rate of 70.95 (±13.22), which was statistically significant with a P value of 0.001. The duration for complete re-epithelialization was 13.80 (±4.63) days for the early exposure method and 29.40 (±6.25) days for the late exposure method. This is statistically significant with P < 0.001.
Conclusion: Management of STSG donor site by early exposure of the donor site dressing is associated with increased re-epithelialization rate and shortened duration for complete donor site healing.
背景:裂厚皮肤移植(STSG)是覆盖皮肤和软组织缺损的一种真正的重建选择,但供体部位的管理仍然是一个挑战。尝试使用不同的方法和各种敷料来改善STSG供体部位的护理;然而,对于供体部位护理的标准方法尚无共识。目的:本研究旨在比较早期和晚期暴露供区敷料方法的STSG愈合率。方法:本研究在尼日利亚东南部埃邦伊州Abakaliki的Alex Ekwueme联邦大学教学医院进行。研究招募了40名患者,并通过简单的随机抽样方法将其分为两组,每组20名患者。A组给药时间较晚,B组给药时间较早。计算两组小鼠第14天再上皮率和完全再上皮持续时间。使用International Business Machine Corporation, Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Chicago Illinois, USA对结果进行分析。(IBM SPSS) Statistics for Windows version 26。结果:早期暴露敷料法的再上皮率为98.15(±4.92),高于晚期暴露敷料法的70.95(±13.22),P值为0.001,差异有统计学意义。早期暴露法完全上皮化时间为13.80(±4.63)d,晚期暴露法为29.40(±6.25)d。P < 0.001,具有统计学意义。结论:早期暴露供区敷料处理STSG供区可提高再上皮化率,缩短供区完全愈合时间。
期刊介绍:
The Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice is a Monthly peer-reviewed international journal published by the Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria. The journal’s full text is available online at www.njcponline.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal makes a token charge for submission, processing and publication of manuscripts including color reproduction of photographs.