Stacey Cowe, Simon B Cooper, Rachel Malcolm, Caroline Sunderland
{"title":"Effect of internal and external cooling on high-intensity intermittent cycling performance and cognitive function in the heat.","authors":"Stacey Cowe, Simon B Cooper, Rachel Malcolm, Caroline Sunderland","doi":"10.1113/EP092679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the effect of internal and external cooling on high-intensity intermittent cycling performance and cognitive function in the heat. Twenty-nine males completed a control trial (CON) and a cooling trial (ice slurry and ice collar; COOL) in the heat (33°C, 50% relative humidity) involving a 40 min intermittent cycling protocol (two sets of ten 2 min stages, each consisting of 5 s sprint, 105 s active recovery and 10 s rest). A battery of cognitive tests was completed pre- and postexercise, with physiological and perceptual responses recorded throughout. No differences in peak or mean power output were found between conditions (all p > 0.05). Average trial rectal (COOL: 37.39°C ± 0.59°C; CON: 37.59°C ± 0.56°C, p < 0.001) and neck (COOL: 28.87°C ± 4.87°C; CON: 32.82°C ± 1.43°C, P < 0.001) temperatures were found to be lower in COOL. Participants reported feeling better and reported lower ratings of thermal sensation and improved comfort in COOL (all p < 0.05). Response times on the Stroop task complex level were quicker over time in COOL (COOL: -48 ± 23 ms; CON: -11 ± 18 ms, p = 0.002) and quicker overall on the number level of Sternberg during COOL (COOL: 434 ± 77 ms; CON: 437 ± 84 ms, p = 0.046). However, over time, the improvement in response times on the number level of Sternberg was greater in CON (COOL: -6 ± 3 ms; CON: -26 ± 2 ms, p = 0.015). Response times became quicker over time to a greater extent in CON on the visual search complex level (COOL: -15 ± 1 ms; CON: -119 ± 31 ms, p = 0.009). The combined cooling intervention did not influence sprint performance and had only a minimal influence on some domains of cognitive function but did lead to improvements in physiological and perceptual responses. These findings provide information on a practical combined cooling method that can be implemented in elite sport.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigated the effect of internal and external cooling on high-intensity intermittent cycling performance and cognitive function in the heat. Twenty-nine males completed a control trial (CON) and a cooling trial (ice slurry and ice collar; COOL) in the heat (33°C, 50% relative humidity) involving a 40 min intermittent cycling protocol (two sets of ten 2 min stages, each consisting of 5 s sprint, 105 s active recovery and 10 s rest). A battery of cognitive tests was completed pre- and postexercise, with physiological and perceptual responses recorded throughout. No differences in peak or mean power output were found between conditions (all p > 0.05). Average trial rectal (COOL: 37.39°C ± 0.59°C; CON: 37.59°C ± 0.56°C, p < 0.001) and neck (COOL: 28.87°C ± 4.87°C; CON: 32.82°C ± 1.43°C, P < 0.001) temperatures were found to be lower in COOL. Participants reported feeling better and reported lower ratings of thermal sensation and improved comfort in COOL (all p < 0.05). Response times on the Stroop task complex level were quicker over time in COOL (COOL: -48 ± 23 ms; CON: -11 ± 18 ms, p = 0.002) and quicker overall on the number level of Sternberg during COOL (COOL: 434 ± 77 ms; CON: 437 ± 84 ms, p = 0.046). However, over time, the improvement in response times on the number level of Sternberg was greater in CON (COOL: -6 ± 3 ms; CON: -26 ± 2 ms, p = 0.015). Response times became quicker over time to a greater extent in CON on the visual search complex level (COOL: -15 ± 1 ms; CON: -119 ± 31 ms, p = 0.009). The combined cooling intervention did not influence sprint performance and had only a minimal influence on some domains of cognitive function but did lead to improvements in physiological and perceptual responses. These findings provide information on a practical combined cooling method that can be implemented in elite sport.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged.
Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.