{"title":"Design and validation of a low‑cost 3D intraoral scanner using structured‑light triangulation and deep‑learning reconstruction.","authors":"Ahmed M M Awad, Ahmed Badway, Lamiaa ElFadaly","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Intraoral scanners (IOSs) have transformed prosthodontic workflows by enabling precise, high-resolution digital scans. However, their high cost and hardware complexity limit adoption in resource-constrained settings.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to design and validate a lightweight, cost-effective IOS prototype hardware using structured-light triangulation and deep-learning reconstruction and to compare its performance with a popular commercially available IOS (TRIOS 3).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A handheld prototype IOS hardware integrating a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) camera (1280×720 px) with both white‑light and red‑laser projectors was developed. Intrinsic and extrinsic calibration used the Zhang method; feature extraction used Canny and scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT), structure‑from‑motion (SfM), and active triangulation generated point clouds in a photogrammetry software program. A YOLO‑V8-style network performed tooth segmentation, followed by a fully convolutional network (FCN) encoder-decoder for depth refinement. A gypsum cast was scanned (307 frames), and the 311 000 initial mesh points outputted were compared against the TRIOS 3 (102 000 points).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ±standard deviation reprojection error of the prototype scanner hardware was 0.30 ±0.15 px (range 0.05 to 1.8 px), within commercial tolerances (0.2 to 0.4 px). The landmark count averaged 4000 ±1200 features per frame. After mesh filtering, 270 000 high‑quality vertices remained. Deep‑learning postprocessing reduced surface artifacts by approximately 20% (qualitative).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The low‑cost IOS achieved point‑cloud densities 3 times higher than the commercially available IOS while maintaining comparable accuracy, demonstrating its potential in affordable digital prosthetic workflows. Future in vivo validation is planned to determine clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.09.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statement of problem: Intraoral scanners (IOSs) have transformed prosthodontic workflows by enabling precise, high-resolution digital scans. However, their high cost and hardware complexity limit adoption in resource-constrained settings.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to design and validate a lightweight, cost-effective IOS prototype hardware using structured-light triangulation and deep-learning reconstruction and to compare its performance with a popular commercially available IOS (TRIOS 3).
Material and methods: A handheld prototype IOS hardware integrating a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) camera (1280×720 px) with both white‑light and red‑laser projectors was developed. Intrinsic and extrinsic calibration used the Zhang method; feature extraction used Canny and scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT), structure‑from‑motion (SfM), and active triangulation generated point clouds in a photogrammetry software program. A YOLO‑V8-style network performed tooth segmentation, followed by a fully convolutional network (FCN) encoder-decoder for depth refinement. A gypsum cast was scanned (307 frames), and the 311 000 initial mesh points outputted were compared against the TRIOS 3 (102 000 points).
Results: The mean ±standard deviation reprojection error of the prototype scanner hardware was 0.30 ±0.15 px (range 0.05 to 1.8 px), within commercial tolerances (0.2 to 0.4 px). The landmark count averaged 4000 ±1200 features per frame. After mesh filtering, 270 000 high‑quality vertices remained. Deep‑learning postprocessing reduced surface artifacts by approximately 20% (qualitative).
Conclusions: The low‑cost IOS achieved point‑cloud densities 3 times higher than the commercially available IOS while maintaining comparable accuracy, demonstrating its potential in affordable digital prosthetic workflows. Future in vivo validation is planned to determine clinical applicability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.