Comparative efficacy of acupuncture-related therapies for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Xuqing Mao, Wenrui Huang, Shanshan Zhang, Ting Chen, Lei Chen, Xiping Liu, Yibin Zhao
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of acupuncture-related therapies for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Xuqing Mao, Wenrui Huang, Shanshan Zhang, Ting Chen, Lei Chen, Xiping Liu, Yibin Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parkinson's disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder marked by progressive motor and non-motor symptoms. Although levodopa remains the standard therapy, long-term use leads to reduced efficacy and motor complications. Acupuncture-related therapies have gained attention as safe, affordable adjuncts, but the comparative effectiveness of different modalities remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of Chinese and international databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of acupuncture-related therapies for PD. Eligible studies were selected based on predefined PICOS criteria. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the RoB 2.0 tool. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using Stata SE 15.1. For continuous outcomes, mean differences were calculated; for binary outcomes, risk ratios were used. A random-effects model was applied, with heterogeneity assessed by τ² and consistency tested across the network. SUCRA values were calculated to rank the comparative efficacy of interventions.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Fifty-seven RCTs (n = 4262; 2002-2024) were included. Interventions comprised manual acupuncture (MA), electroacupuncture (EA), warm acupuncture (WA), fire acupuncture (FA), and moxibustion (MOX), used alone or in combination with conventional medication (CM) or Chinese herbal medicine (CHM). For total effective rate (41 RCTs; n = 3086), the most pronounced benefit was observed with EA + WA + CM (RR = 3.00; 95 % CI: 1.20-7.48; SUCRA = 97 %; moderate confidence). Significant improvements were also found for MOX + CM (RR = 1.33; 1.07-1.64; SUCRA = 68.8 %), MA + CM (RR = 1.20; 1.10-1.32; SUCRA = 51.7 %), and EA + CM (RR = 1.15; 1.05-1.26; SUCRA = 38.3 %). For UPDRS (36 RCTs; n = 2655), MA + CM significantly improved motor symptoms compared with CM (MD = -0.89; 95 % CI: -1.58 to -0.20; SUCRA = 61.6 %; moderate certainty). For Webster score (5 RCTs; n = 444), both EA + CM (MD = -3.65; -5.01 to -2.28; SUCRA = 91.1 %) and MA + CM (MD = -2.62; -4.31 to -0.92; SUCRA = 61.8 %) were superior to CM. For HAMD (11 RCTs; n = 802), significant reductions in depressive symptoms were observed with MA + CM (MD = -2.41; 95 % CI: -3.48 to -1.34; SUCRA = 91.9 %) and EA + CM (MD = -2.16; 95 % CI: -3.74 to -0.58; SUCRA = 62.8 %). CINeMA ratings were low to moderate for most pairwise comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acupuncture-based therapies provided added benefits over conventional medication for Parkinson's disease. EA + WA + CM showed the most consistent improvement in overall effectiveness, MA + CM was most effective for motor symptoms, EA + CM and MA + CM demonstrated superiority for Webster scores, and MA + CM also performed best for depressive symptoms. Although the certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate, these findings suggest that tailored combinations of acupuncture and conventional treatment may optimize outcomes in PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"115848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder marked by progressive motor and non-motor symptoms. Although levodopa remains the standard therapy, long-term use leads to reduced efficacy and motor complications. Acupuncture-related therapies have gained attention as safe, affordable adjuncts, but the comparative effectiveness of different modalities remains uncertain.

Method: We conducted a comprehensive search of Chinese and international databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of acupuncture-related therapies for PD. Eligible studies were selected based on predefined PICOS criteria. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the RoB 2.0 tool. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using Stata SE 15.1. For continuous outcomes, mean differences were calculated; for binary outcomes, risk ratios were used. A random-effects model was applied, with heterogeneity assessed by τ² and consistency tested across the network. SUCRA values were calculated to rank the comparative efficacy of interventions.

Result: Fifty-seven RCTs (n = 4262; 2002-2024) were included. Interventions comprised manual acupuncture (MA), electroacupuncture (EA), warm acupuncture (WA), fire acupuncture (FA), and moxibustion (MOX), used alone or in combination with conventional medication (CM) or Chinese herbal medicine (CHM). For total effective rate (41 RCTs; n = 3086), the most pronounced benefit was observed with EA + WA + CM (RR = 3.00; 95 % CI: 1.20-7.48; SUCRA = 97 %; moderate confidence). Significant improvements were also found for MOX + CM (RR = 1.33; 1.07-1.64; SUCRA = 68.8 %), MA + CM (RR = 1.20; 1.10-1.32; SUCRA = 51.7 %), and EA + CM (RR = 1.15; 1.05-1.26; SUCRA = 38.3 %). For UPDRS (36 RCTs; n = 2655), MA + CM significantly improved motor symptoms compared with CM (MD = -0.89; 95 % CI: -1.58 to -0.20; SUCRA = 61.6 %; moderate certainty). For Webster score (5 RCTs; n = 444), both EA + CM (MD = -3.65; -5.01 to -2.28; SUCRA = 91.1 %) and MA + CM (MD = -2.62; -4.31 to -0.92; SUCRA = 61.8 %) were superior to CM. For HAMD (11 RCTs; n = 802), significant reductions in depressive symptoms were observed with MA + CM (MD = -2.41; 95 % CI: -3.48 to -1.34; SUCRA = 91.9 %) and EA + CM (MD = -2.16; 95 % CI: -3.74 to -0.58; SUCRA = 62.8 %). CINeMA ratings were low to moderate for most pairwise comparisons.

Conclusion: Acupuncture-based therapies provided added benefits over conventional medication for Parkinson's disease. EA + WA + CM showed the most consistent improvement in overall effectiveness, MA + CM was most effective for motor symptoms, EA + CM and MA + CM demonstrated superiority for Webster scores, and MA + CM also performed best for depressive symptoms. Although the certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate, these findings suggest that tailored combinations of acupuncture and conventional treatment may optimize outcomes in PD.

针灸相关疗法治疗帕金森病的比较疗效:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:帕金森病(PD)是一种常见的神经退行性疾病,以进行性运动和非运动症状为特征。虽然左旋多巴仍然是标准的治疗方法,但长期使用会导致疗效降低和运动并发症。针灸相关疗法作为安全、负担得起的辅助手段已引起人们的注意,但不同方式的相对有效性仍不确定。方法:我们对国内外数据库进行了全面检索,以确定评估针灸相关疗法治疗帕金森病有效性的随机对照试验(rct)。根据预定义的PICOS标准选择符合条件的研究。两位审稿人独立筛选研究,提取数据,并使用RoB 2.0工具评估偏倚风险。使用Stata SE 15.1进行频率网络元分析。对于连续结果,计算平均差异;对于二元结果,使用风险比。采用随机效应模型,通过τ²评估异质性,并在整个网络中检验一致性。计算SUCRA值对干预措施的比较疗效进行排序。结果:共纳入57项rct (n = 4262; 2002-2024)。干预措施包括手工针灸(MA)、电针(EA)、温针(WA)、火针(FA)和艾灸(MOX),单独使用或与常规药物(CM)或中草药(CHM)联合使用。对于总有效率(41个rct; n = 3,086), EA + WA + CM的获益最为显著(RR = 3.00; 95% CI: 1.20-7.48; SUCRA = 97%;中等置信度)。MOX + CM (RR = 1.33; 1.07-1.64; SUCRA = 68.8%)、MA + CM (RR = 1.20; 1.10-1.32; SUCRA = 51.7%)和EA + CM (RR = 1.15; 1.05-1.26; SUCRA = 38.3%)也有显著改善。对于UPDRS(36项rct, n = 2,655),与CM相比,MA + CM显著改善了运动症状(MD = -0.89; 95% CI: -1.58至-0.20;SUCRA = 61.6%;中等确定性)。对于Webster评分(5个rct, n = 444), EA + CM (MD = -3.65; -5.01 ~ -2.28; SUCRA = 91.1%)和MA + CM (MD = -2.62; -4.31 ~ -0.92; SUCRA = 61.8%)均优于CM。对于HAMD(11项rct, n = 802), MA + CM (MD = -2.41; 95% CI: -3.48至-1.34;SUCRA = 91.9%)和EA + CM (MD = -2.16; 95% CI: -3.74至-0.58;SUCRA = 62.8%)显著减少抑郁症状。在大多数两两比较中,电影评分都是低到中等。结论:以针灸为基础的疗法比传统药物治疗帕金森病提供了额外的好处。EA + WA + CM对整体疗效的改善最为一致,MA + CM对运动症状最有效,EA + CM和MA + CM对Webster评分表现出优势,MA + CM对抑郁症状也表现出最好的效果。尽管证据的确定性从低到中等不等,但这些发现表明,针灸和传统治疗的量身定制组合可能会优化PD的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信