Assessing the Early Sepsis Warning System in the Emergency Department.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Shih-Chang Hsu, Chin-Wang Hsu, Chun-You Chen, Chih-Hsin Lee, Chung-Chien Huang, Le Duc Huy, Chung-Liang Shih, Shau-Ku Huang, Tsong-Yih Ou
{"title":"Assessing the Early Sepsis Warning System in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Shih-Chang Hsu, Chin-Wang Hsu, Chun-You Chen, Chih-Hsin Lee, Chung-Chien Huang, Le Duc Huy, Chung-Liang Shih, Shau-Ku Huang, Tsong-Yih Ou","doi":"10.1016/j.ijid.2025.108083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection and timely intervention are critical in managing sepsis. To address challenges in sepsis recognition in the emergency department, we implemented a two-stage Early Sepsis Warning System (ESWS) integrated with our electronic medical record (EMR) system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the ESWS on sepsis management and patient outcomes in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study analyzing data from patients admitted with sepsis or septic shock between July 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022. The study period was divided into pre-ESWS and post-ESWS implementation phases. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included ICU admission rates, length of ICU and hospital stay, and frequency of lactate measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,028 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality rates between the pre-ESWS and post-ESWS periods, with rates of 8.85% and 8.39%, respectively (p = 0.599). However, ICU admission rates significantly decreased from 11.87% to 9.31% (p = 0.008). The proportion of patients undergoing lactate testing increased substantially after the implementation of the ESWS, rising from 10.39% to 38.72% (p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis showed improved outcomes among pneumonia patients, which included reductions in ICU admissions and shorter hospital stays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of the ESWS was associated with reduced ICU admissions and improved adherence to sepsis care processes, particularly among patients with pneumonia. However, its impact on overall mortality was limited, highlighting the need to enhance system utilization and tailor interventions to diverse clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":14006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"108083"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2025.108083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early detection and timely intervention are critical in managing sepsis. To address challenges in sepsis recognition in the emergency department, we implemented a two-stage Early Sepsis Warning System (ESWS) integrated with our electronic medical record (EMR) system.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the ESWS on sepsis management and patient outcomes in the emergency department.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study analyzing data from patients admitted with sepsis or septic shock between July 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022. The study period was divided into pre-ESWS and post-ESWS implementation phases. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included ICU admission rates, length of ICU and hospital stay, and frequency of lactate measurement.

Results: A total of 4,028 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality rates between the pre-ESWS and post-ESWS periods, with rates of 8.85% and 8.39%, respectively (p = 0.599). However, ICU admission rates significantly decreased from 11.87% to 9.31% (p = 0.008). The proportion of patients undergoing lactate testing increased substantially after the implementation of the ESWS, rising from 10.39% to 38.72% (p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis showed improved outcomes among pneumonia patients, which included reductions in ICU admissions and shorter hospital stays.

Conclusions: The implementation of the ESWS was associated with reduced ICU admissions and improved adherence to sepsis care processes, particularly among patients with pneumonia. However, its impact on overall mortality was limited, highlighting the need to enhance system utilization and tailor interventions to diverse clinical contexts.

急诊部门脓毒症早期预警系统的评估
背景:早期发现和及时干预是处理败血症的关键。为了应对急诊科脓毒症识别的挑战,我们实施了一个两阶段的早期脓毒症预警系统(ESWS),与我们的电子病历(EMR)系统集成。目的:本研究旨在评估ESWS对急诊科脓毒症管理和患者预后的临床影响。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究,分析了2019年7月1日至2022年6月30日期间入院的败血症或感染性休克患者的数据。研究阶段分为esws实施前和esws实施后两个阶段。主要结局是住院死亡率;次要结局包括ICU入院率、ICU时间和住院时间以及乳酸测量频率。结果:共纳入4028例患者。esws前后住院死亡率差异无统计学意义,分别为8.85%和8.39% (p = 0.599)。ICU住院率由11.87%降至9.31% (p = 0.008)。实施ESWS后,接受乳酸检测的患者比例大幅上升,由10.39%上升至38.72% (p < 0.00001)。亚组分析显示肺炎患者的预后得到改善,包括ICU住院人数减少和住院时间缩短。结论:ESWS的实施与减少ICU住院率和提高败血症护理过程的依从性有关,特别是在肺炎患者中。然而,它对总死亡率的影响是有限的,强调需要加强系统的利用,并根据不同的临床情况量身定制干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
1020
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID) Publisher: International Society for Infectious Diseases Publication Frequency: Monthly Type: Peer-reviewed, Open Access Scope: Publishes original clinical and laboratory-based research. Reports clinical trials, reviews, and some case reports. Focuses on epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of infectious diseases. Emphasizes diseases common in under-resourced countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信