{"title":"Assessment of Indium-Free Transparent Conductive Oxide Back Contacts for High-Efficiency Ultra-Thin Cu (In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells Down to 250 nm","authors":"Fabien Mollica, Marie Jubault, Frederique Donsanti, Muriel Bouttemy, Arnaud Etcheberry, Negar Naghavi","doi":"10.1002/pip.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This work examines the feasibility and performance impact of replacing the usual molybdenum back contact with indium-free transparent conductive oxides (TCOs) like fluorine-doped tin oxide (SnO<sub>2</sub>:F) and aluminum-doped zinc oxide (ZnO:Al) for ultra-thin Cu (In,Ga)Se<sub>2</sub> (CIGS) solar cells (250–450 nm). Motivated by indium scarcity and cost reduction, these TCOs are evaluated for their figure of merit, stability under Se atmosphere, Na diffusion permeability, and band alignment with CIGS absorbers. Using simulations, prototype fabrication, and comprehensive characterizations, the compatibility of these TCOs with CIGS absorbers is assessed. Solar cells with thicknesses of 450 and 250 nm are fabricated. Their performance was compared under both rear and front illumination, as well as with the use of reflectors. A record efficiency of 8.6% with front illumination is achieved for a 250-nm CIGS absorber using a gold back reflector with SnO<sub>2</sub>:F, single-step CIGS deposition, and no heavy alkalines doping. The best rear-illuminated efficiencies are obtained with ZnO:Al back contacts, reaching 6% for a 250-nm CIGS, with only a 9% loss in <i>J</i><sub><i>sc</i></sub> compared to front illumination, confirming a lower surface recombination rate at the ZnO:Al/CIGS interface compared to Mo/CIGS or SnO<sub>2</sub>:F/CIGS interfaces.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":223,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Photovoltaics","volume":"33 10","pages":"1109-1123"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Photovoltaics","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pip.70013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This work examines the feasibility and performance impact of replacing the usual molybdenum back contact with indium-free transparent conductive oxides (TCOs) like fluorine-doped tin oxide (SnO2:F) and aluminum-doped zinc oxide (ZnO:Al) for ultra-thin Cu (In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) solar cells (250–450 nm). Motivated by indium scarcity and cost reduction, these TCOs are evaluated for their figure of merit, stability under Se atmosphere, Na diffusion permeability, and band alignment with CIGS absorbers. Using simulations, prototype fabrication, and comprehensive characterizations, the compatibility of these TCOs with CIGS absorbers is assessed. Solar cells with thicknesses of 450 and 250 nm are fabricated. Their performance was compared under both rear and front illumination, as well as with the use of reflectors. A record efficiency of 8.6% with front illumination is achieved for a 250-nm CIGS absorber using a gold back reflector with SnO2:F, single-step CIGS deposition, and no heavy alkalines doping. The best rear-illuminated efficiencies are obtained with ZnO:Al back contacts, reaching 6% for a 250-nm CIGS, with only a 9% loss in Jsc compared to front illumination, confirming a lower surface recombination rate at the ZnO:Al/CIGS interface compared to Mo/CIGS or SnO2:F/CIGS interfaces.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Photovoltaics offers a prestigious forum for reporting advances in this rapidly developing technology, aiming to reach all interested professionals, researchers and energy policy-makers.
The key criterion is that all papers submitted should report substantial “progress” in photovoltaics.
Papers are encouraged that report substantial “progress” such as gains in independently certified solar cell efficiency, eligible for a new entry in the journal''s widely referenced Solar Cell Efficiency Tables.
Examples of papers that will not be considered for publication are those that report development in materials without relation to data on cell performance, routine analysis, characterisation or modelling of cells or processing sequences, routine reports of system performance, improvements in electronic hardware design, or country programs, although invited papers may occasionally be solicited in these areas to capture accumulated “progress”.