State, Capital and Coercion in Indonesia's Food Estates

IF 2.9 2区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Fuad Abdulgani, Laksmi Adriani Savitri
{"title":"State, Capital and Coercion in Indonesia's Food Estates","authors":"Fuad Abdulgani,&nbsp;Laksmi Adriani Savitri","doi":"10.1111/joac.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>From colonial times to the present, the Indonesian state has continuously attempted to re-organise nature, technology and relations of production by establishing large-scale food monocrop farming or “food estates”. As Indonesian food production has largely been based on petty commodity production by small farmers, including a minority of petty capitalists and a large majority of marginal farmers, we ask why food estate initiatives have been persistently reproduced in different times and places despite a century-long history of failure of such projects. As we show through historical and contemporary examples of food estate programmes, the Indonesian “outer islands” have been the main sites of accelerated corporate land grabbing and coercion in both wage labour and contract farming labour regimes. We argue that the persistence of food estate visions and initiatives can be understood as an enduring colonialism, structured through the idealisation of modern industrial agriculture, the view of small farmers as ‘racialised others’, backward and inferior and the systematic denial of customary land rights. This is made possible by the integration of corporate agribusiness in the state's food self-sufficiency project, producing labour regimes sustained by the state coercion as evidenced by the increasing military involvement in food estate projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agrarian Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joac.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From colonial times to the present, the Indonesian state has continuously attempted to re-organise nature, technology and relations of production by establishing large-scale food monocrop farming or “food estates”. As Indonesian food production has largely been based on petty commodity production by small farmers, including a minority of petty capitalists and a large majority of marginal farmers, we ask why food estate initiatives have been persistently reproduced in different times and places despite a century-long history of failure of such projects. As we show through historical and contemporary examples of food estate programmes, the Indonesian “outer islands” have been the main sites of accelerated corporate land grabbing and coercion in both wage labour and contract farming labour regimes. We argue that the persistence of food estate visions and initiatives can be understood as an enduring colonialism, structured through the idealisation of modern industrial agriculture, the view of small farmers as ‘racialised others’, backward and inferior and the systematic denial of customary land rights. This is made possible by the integration of corporate agribusiness in the state's food self-sufficiency project, producing labour regimes sustained by the state coercion as evidenced by the increasing military involvement in food estate projects.

Abstract Image

印尼粮食产业中的国家、资本和强制
从殖民时代到现在,印度尼西亚国家一直试图通过建立大规模的单一作物粮食种植或“粮食庄园”来重新组织自然、技术和生产关系。由于印尼的粮食生产在很大程度上是基于小农的小商品生产,包括少数小资本家和绝大多数边缘农民,我们问为什么食品地产倡议在不同的时间和地点持续复制,尽管这类项目有一个世纪的失败历史。正如我们通过历史和当代粮食地产项目的例子所展示的那样,印度尼西亚的“外岛”一直是企业加速掠夺土地和强迫雇佣劳动力和承包农业劳动力制度的主要场所。我们认为,粮食产业愿景和倡议的持续存在可以被理解为一种持久的殖民主义,这种殖民主义是通过对现代工业化农业的理想化、将小农视为“种族化的他人”、落后和劣等的观点以及对传统土地权利的系统性否认来构建的。这是通过将农业综合企业整合到国家的粮食自给项目中来实现的,这产生了由国家强制维持的劳动制度,这一点从军队越来越多地参与粮食产业项目中得到了证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agrarian Change is a journal of agrarian political economy. It promotes investigation of the social relations and dynamics of production, property and power in agrarian formations and their processes of change, both historical and contemporary. It encourages work within a broad interdisciplinary framework, informed by theory, and serves as a forum for serious comparative analysis and scholarly debate. Contributions are welcomed from political economists, historians, anthropologists, sociologists, political scientists, economists, geographers, lawyers, and others committed to the rigorous study and analysis of agrarian structure and change, past and present, in different parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信