{"title":"Apparent Intensity Dependence of Shunts in PV Modules Revision of the Shunt Parameterization in the De Soto Model and PVsyst","authors":"Nils-Peter Harder, José Cano Garcia","doi":"10.1002/pip.3870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>It is common practice in PV system simulation to use the De Soto model, which describes how to use the 1-diode equivalent circuit model for modules. De Soto's model scales the shunt with irradiance, making it disappear toward zero W/m<sup>2</sup>. Also, the commercial software PVsyst uses a parameterization that reduces the shunt effect when the irradiance goes down. However, the solar cells that make up a module typically do not have an illumination-dependent shunt. We therefore investigate the origin of the intensity-dependent apparent shunt in modules. We show that this apparent shunt (derived from the slope of the quasi-linear region from <i>I</i><sub>SC</sub> onwards) is a misinterpretation for module <i>I-V</i> curves and has little to do with a shunt conductance, although this slope method serves well for determining the shunt conductance of individual cells. Instead, the module <i>I</i>-<i>V</i> curve slope of the quasi-linear region from <i>I</i><sub>SC</sub> onwards is strongly influenced by even small <i>I</i><sub>SC</sub> mismatches between the cells. Such mismatch can occur from small illumination inhomogeneity even for A+ solar simulators in the laboratory, or from cell production variation. Abandoning the practice of using the <i>I</i>-<i>V</i> curve slope to determine the shunt value for equivalent circuit models of modules (and the corresponding shunt scaling in the De Soto model or PVsyst) contributes to physically more meaningful <i>I</i>-<i>V</i> curve parameterizations and bears the opportunity for further improved accuracy of PV system energy yield prediction.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":223,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Photovoltaics","volume":"33 10","pages":"1035-1045"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Photovoltaics","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pip.3870","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is common practice in PV system simulation to use the De Soto model, which describes how to use the 1-diode equivalent circuit model for modules. De Soto's model scales the shunt with irradiance, making it disappear toward zero W/m2. Also, the commercial software PVsyst uses a parameterization that reduces the shunt effect when the irradiance goes down. However, the solar cells that make up a module typically do not have an illumination-dependent shunt. We therefore investigate the origin of the intensity-dependent apparent shunt in modules. We show that this apparent shunt (derived from the slope of the quasi-linear region from ISC onwards) is a misinterpretation for module I-V curves and has little to do with a shunt conductance, although this slope method serves well for determining the shunt conductance of individual cells. Instead, the module I-V curve slope of the quasi-linear region from ISC onwards is strongly influenced by even small ISC mismatches between the cells. Such mismatch can occur from small illumination inhomogeneity even for A+ solar simulators in the laboratory, or from cell production variation. Abandoning the practice of using the I-V curve slope to determine the shunt value for equivalent circuit models of modules (and the corresponding shunt scaling in the De Soto model or PVsyst) contributes to physically more meaningful I-V curve parameterizations and bears the opportunity for further improved accuracy of PV system energy yield prediction.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Photovoltaics offers a prestigious forum for reporting advances in this rapidly developing technology, aiming to reach all interested professionals, researchers and energy policy-makers.
The key criterion is that all papers submitted should report substantial “progress” in photovoltaics.
Papers are encouraged that report substantial “progress” such as gains in independently certified solar cell efficiency, eligible for a new entry in the journal''s widely referenced Solar Cell Efficiency Tables.
Examples of papers that will not be considered for publication are those that report development in materials without relation to data on cell performance, routine analysis, characterisation or modelling of cells or processing sequences, routine reports of system performance, improvements in electronic hardware design, or country programs, although invited papers may occasionally be solicited in these areas to capture accumulated “progress”.