Caroline Bossuyt, Arnold J. den Dekker, Domenico Iuso, Jan De Beenhouwer, Jan Sijbers
{"title":"Framework for optimal design of a multi-source rectangular X-ray cargo scanning system","authors":"Caroline Bossuyt, Arnold J. den Dekker, Domenico Iuso, Jan De Beenhouwer, Jan Sijbers","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The first line of non-destructive inspection of cargo often relies on single or double-view X-ray radiography, which is fast but lacks depth resolution and is prone to object occlusion. In contrast, conventional X-ray computed tomography (CT) allows 3D imaging but typically relies on mechanically rotating gantries, which limits throughput and increases system complexity. Recently, multi-source fixed-gantry X-ray systems have been proposed as a promising acquisition geometry to combine high imaging speed with volumetric imaging, while reducing mechanical complexity. The precision of the reconstructed images stemming from these systems as a function of the acquisition setup has however hardly been explored. This paper proposes a flexible framework for optimal experiment design of a rectangular multi-source X-ray cargo scanning system. The proposed framework allows the experimenter to calculate the highest attainable imaging precision, as quantified by the Cramér–Rao lower bound (CRLB), as a function of the X-ray system’s geometric settings, which facilitates optimal experiment design. To illustrate this potential, several system configurations with differently positioned and oriented sources are evaluated and compared in terms of the CRLB-based A-optimality criterion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 113332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25008242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The first line of non-destructive inspection of cargo often relies on single or double-view X-ray radiography, which is fast but lacks depth resolution and is prone to object occlusion. In contrast, conventional X-ray computed tomography (CT) allows 3D imaging but typically relies on mechanically rotating gantries, which limits throughput and increases system complexity. Recently, multi-source fixed-gantry X-ray systems have been proposed as a promising acquisition geometry to combine high imaging speed with volumetric imaging, while reducing mechanical complexity. The precision of the reconstructed images stemming from these systems as a function of the acquisition setup has however hardly been explored. This paper proposes a flexible framework for optimal experiment design of a rectangular multi-source X-ray cargo scanning system. The proposed framework allows the experimenter to calculate the highest attainable imaging precision, as quantified by the Cramér–Rao lower bound (CRLB), as a function of the X-ray system’s geometric settings, which facilitates optimal experiment design. To illustrate this potential, several system configurations with differently positioned and oriented sources are evaluated and compared in terms of the CRLB-based A-optimality criterion.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.