Distress Tolerance & Emotion Regulation as Potential Mediators Between Race-Based Traumatic Stress and Maladaptive Coping.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Lorraine T Benuto,Yueran Yang,Natalia Duda,Cossette Canovas,Brenda Zavala
{"title":"Distress Tolerance & Emotion Regulation as Potential Mediators Between Race-Based Traumatic Stress and Maladaptive Coping.","authors":"Lorraine T Benuto,Yueran Yang,Natalia Duda,Cossette Canovas,Brenda Zavala","doi":"10.1177/08862605251372574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing body of literature suggests that experiences of discrimination can result in race-based traumatic stress symptoms (RBTSS), which manifest in symptoms similar to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and secondary traumatic stress (STS). Currently, research on RBTSS has focused on construct conceptualization, and little is known about the coping strategies used by individuals who have RBTSS and how mechanisms associated with other forms of traumatic stress relate to RBTSS. We examined emotion regulation and distress tolerance as potential mediators between RBTSS and the utilization of maladaptive coping mechanisms. Participants of color (N = 220) completed self-report measures (online) of emotion regulation, distress tolerance, RBTSS, and coping behaviors. A parallel multiple mediator model was analyzed using structural equation modeling to investigate the hypothesis that distress tolerance and emotion regulation would act as mediators in the relationship between RBTSS and the use of maladaptive coping. Our hypothesis was partially supported as the effect of RBTSS on maladaptive coping was mediated by emotion regulation but not by distress tolerance. The findings of this study have important implications for research and intervention. Our results suggest that RBTSS share more similarities with STS than with PTSD in the context of maladaptive coping utilization. Regarding interventions, strategies for improving emotion regulation could be effective in decreasing the use of maladaptive coping strategies (e.g., self-blame and substance use) with this population.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"53 1","pages":"8862605251372574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251372574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing body of literature suggests that experiences of discrimination can result in race-based traumatic stress symptoms (RBTSS), which manifest in symptoms similar to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and secondary traumatic stress (STS). Currently, research on RBTSS has focused on construct conceptualization, and little is known about the coping strategies used by individuals who have RBTSS and how mechanisms associated with other forms of traumatic stress relate to RBTSS. We examined emotion regulation and distress tolerance as potential mediators between RBTSS and the utilization of maladaptive coping mechanisms. Participants of color (N = 220) completed self-report measures (online) of emotion regulation, distress tolerance, RBTSS, and coping behaviors. A parallel multiple mediator model was analyzed using structural equation modeling to investigate the hypothesis that distress tolerance and emotion regulation would act as mediators in the relationship between RBTSS and the use of maladaptive coping. Our hypothesis was partially supported as the effect of RBTSS on maladaptive coping was mediated by emotion regulation but not by distress tolerance. The findings of this study have important implications for research and intervention. Our results suggest that RBTSS share more similarities with STS than with PTSD in the context of maladaptive coping utilization. Regarding interventions, strategies for improving emotion regulation could be effective in decreasing the use of maladaptive coping strategies (e.g., self-blame and substance use) with this population.
痛苦容忍与情绪调节在种族创伤应激与适应不良应对之间的潜在中介作用。
越来越多的文献表明,歧视的经历可能导致基于种族的创伤应激症状(RBTSS),其症状表现类似于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和继发性创伤应激(STS)。目前,对创伤性应激障碍的研究主要集中在建构概念化方面,对创伤性应激障碍个体的应对策略以及其他创伤应激形式与创伤性应激障碍的相关机制知之甚少。我们研究了情绪调节和痛苦耐受作为RBTSS与适应不良应对机制利用之间的潜在中介。有色人种(N = 220)完成了情绪调节、痛苦耐受性、RBTSS和应对行为的在线自我报告。采用结构方程模型构建平行多中介模型,探讨应激容忍和情绪调节在RBTSS与适应不良应对的关系中起中介作用的假设。我们的假设得到了部分支持,因为RBTSS对适应不良应对的影响是由情绪调节介导的,而不是由痛苦耐受介导的。本研究结果对研究和干预具有重要意义。我们的研究结果表明,RBTSS与STS在适应不良应对利用方面的相似性大于与PTSD的相似性。关于干预措施,改善情绪调节的策略可以有效地减少使用适应不良的应对策略(例如,自责和物质使用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信