{"title":"Science literacy and the acceptance of scientific facts","authors":"Aart van Stekelenburg","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Science communication research provides insight into the role of science literacy in the acceptance of scientific facts. While it makes intuitive sense to expect the ability to understand and use science to be positively related to belief in scientific facts, some influential works have instead suggested that science literacy leads to polarization on controversial science topics. More recent studies, made possible by developments in the definition and measurement of science literacy, indicate that it is positively correlated with belief in scientific facts and likely does not lead to belief polarization in most situations. Still, more research investigating the various aspects of science literacy, testing the causal effect of improving it, and with samples from various countries and clear reporting of outcome variables is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102183"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Science communication research provides insight into the role of science literacy in the acceptance of scientific facts. While it makes intuitive sense to expect the ability to understand and use science to be positively related to belief in scientific facts, some influential works have instead suggested that science literacy leads to polarization on controversial science topics. More recent studies, made possible by developments in the definition and measurement of science literacy, indicate that it is positively correlated with belief in scientific facts and likely does not lead to belief polarization in most situations. Still, more research investigating the various aspects of science literacy, testing the causal effect of improving it, and with samples from various countries and clear reporting of outcome variables is needed.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology