Linking groundwater recharge dynamics to traditional irrigation practices in a semiarid mountain-front system

IF 6.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
H. Bouimouass, Y. Ouassanouan, M.W. Baba, A. Chehbouni
{"title":"Linking groundwater recharge dynamics to traditional irrigation practices in a semiarid mountain-front system","authors":"H. Bouimouass, Y. Ouassanouan, M.W. Baba, A. Chehbouni","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Groundwater recharge in mountain-front areas is a critical yet poorly constrained component of the water cycle in semiarid regions, particularly where traditional irrigation practices dominate. This study investigates the spatiotemporal dynamics of recharge induced by gravity-fed irrigation in the mountain-front of the Moroccan High Atlas, a key recharge zone for the Haouz aquifer. A simplified water balance approach, corrected for groundwater-based evapotranspiration, was applied to a 20-year dataset of irrigation diversions and remotely sensed evapotranspiration (MOD16A2), and validated against recharge estimates from the water table fluctuation (WTF) method. Results show strong spatial disparities, with upstream zones receiving disproportionately higher water allocations due to ancestral water rights, sustaining potential recharge in ∼90 % of months, while midstream and downstream zones consistently faced deficits. Despite local recharge events linked to flood years, statistically significant declining trends in recharge were observed across all zones, reflecting both reduced streamflow and intensified groundwater abstraction. Sensitivity tests revealed that neglecting rainfall and ΔS introduces only modest biases (≤12 % in upstream, ≤24 % in midstream zones), confirming the dominance of irrigation as the primary recharge driver. Potential recharge estimates aligned closely with WTF-derived values (differences of 5–14 %), further attesting to the reliability of the approach. These findings highlight the vulnerability of traditional irrigation systems under climate and human pressures and emphasize the urgent need for integrated water management strategies that safeguard ancestral irrigation practices while promoting adaptive measures such as managed aquifer recharge and climate-smart agriculture.","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109855","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Groundwater recharge in mountain-front areas is a critical yet poorly constrained component of the water cycle in semiarid regions, particularly where traditional irrigation practices dominate. This study investigates the spatiotemporal dynamics of recharge induced by gravity-fed irrigation in the mountain-front of the Moroccan High Atlas, a key recharge zone for the Haouz aquifer. A simplified water balance approach, corrected for groundwater-based evapotranspiration, was applied to a 20-year dataset of irrigation diversions and remotely sensed evapotranspiration (MOD16A2), and validated against recharge estimates from the water table fluctuation (WTF) method. Results show strong spatial disparities, with upstream zones receiving disproportionately higher water allocations due to ancestral water rights, sustaining potential recharge in ∼90 % of months, while midstream and downstream zones consistently faced deficits. Despite local recharge events linked to flood years, statistically significant declining trends in recharge were observed across all zones, reflecting both reduced streamflow and intensified groundwater abstraction. Sensitivity tests revealed that neglecting rainfall and ΔS introduces only modest biases (≤12 % in upstream, ≤24 % in midstream zones), confirming the dominance of irrigation as the primary recharge driver. Potential recharge estimates aligned closely with WTF-derived values (differences of 5–14 %), further attesting to the reliability of the approach. These findings highlight the vulnerability of traditional irrigation systems under climate and human pressures and emphasize the urgent need for integrated water management strategies that safeguard ancestral irrigation practices while promoting adaptive measures such as managed aquifer recharge and climate-smart agriculture.
半干旱山前系统中地下水补给动态与传统灌溉方法的联系
山前地区的地下水补给是半干旱地区水循环的一个关键但缺乏约束的组成部分,特别是在传统灌溉方式占主导地位的地区。本研究探讨了Haouz含水层重要补给区摩洛哥高地山前地区重力灌溉诱导的补给时空动态。将基于地下水的蒸散发校正后的简化水平衡方法应用于20年灌溉改道和遥感蒸散发数据集(MOD16A2),并与来自地下水位波动(WTF)方法的补给估算值进行了验证。结果显示出强烈的空间差异,上游地区由于祖传的水权而获得不成比例的更高的水分配,维持约90% %的月潜在补给,而中游和下游地区一直面临短缺。尽管局部补给事件与洪水年有关,但在所有区域都观察到统计上显著的补给下降趋势,反映了河流流量减少和地下水开采加剧。敏感性试验表明,忽略降雨和ΔS只会带来适度的偏差(上游地区≤12 %,中游地区≤24 %),证实了灌溉作为主要补给驱动因素的优势。潜在补给估算值与wtf推导的值非常接近(差异为5-14 %),进一步证明了该方法的可靠性。这些发现突出了传统灌溉系统在气候和人类压力下的脆弱性,并强调了迫切需要制定综合水管理战略,以保护祖传的灌溉做法,同时促进适应性措施,如有管理的含水层补给和气候智能型农业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信