{"title":"Corporate ESG performance and operational efficiency: The moderating effect of supply chain concentration","authors":"Lihua Sun , Chunguang Bai , Joseph Sarkis","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and performance are of interest to diverse stakeholders. Organizations know they have to respond to this increased interest. Organizations, and scholarly research, have questions on whether ESG performance and firm operational efficiency relate to each other. Previous evidence on this relationship is mixed. This study delves more deeply to help identify whether context, especially supply chain characteristics provide insights into this relationship. Thus, we explore how an important external supply chain relational characteristic—supply chain concentration—moderates this relationship. We use a sample of 41,717 firm-year observations of 4772 Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 to investigate these relationships. The findings reveal that environmental dimensions have a significant <em>negative</em> relationship to corporate operational efficiency. Social and governance dimensions have significant <em>positive</em> relationships to corporate operational efficiency. Interestingly, there is an asymmetric moderation result. Supplier concentration significantly moderates the relationship between environmental performance and operational efficiency; customer concentration significantly moderates the relationships between both social and governance performance and operational efficiency. The study also sheds light on the relationships between contextual factors and operational efficiency, with firm age, board independence, revenue growth and financial leverage all significantly relate to corporate efficiency. The research findings provide valuable insights for practitioners. The findings also bring up additional questions for supply chain sustainability researchers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 104446"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525004879","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and performance are of interest to diverse stakeholders. Organizations know they have to respond to this increased interest. Organizations, and scholarly research, have questions on whether ESG performance and firm operational efficiency relate to each other. Previous evidence on this relationship is mixed. This study delves more deeply to help identify whether context, especially supply chain characteristics provide insights into this relationship. Thus, we explore how an important external supply chain relational characteristic—supply chain concentration—moderates this relationship. We use a sample of 41,717 firm-year observations of 4772 Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 to investigate these relationships. The findings reveal that environmental dimensions have a significant negative relationship to corporate operational efficiency. Social and governance dimensions have significant positive relationships to corporate operational efficiency. Interestingly, there is an asymmetric moderation result. Supplier concentration significantly moderates the relationship between environmental performance and operational efficiency; customer concentration significantly moderates the relationships between both social and governance performance and operational efficiency. The study also sheds light on the relationships between contextual factors and operational efficiency, with firm age, board independence, revenue growth and financial leverage all significantly relate to corporate efficiency. The research findings provide valuable insights for practitioners. The findings also bring up additional questions for supply chain sustainability researchers.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.