Corporate ESG performance and operational efficiency: The moderating effect of supply chain concentration

IF 8.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Lihua Sun , Chunguang Bai , Joseph Sarkis
{"title":"Corporate ESG performance and operational efficiency: The moderating effect of supply chain concentration","authors":"Lihua Sun ,&nbsp;Chunguang Bai ,&nbsp;Joseph Sarkis","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and performance are of interest to diverse stakeholders. Organizations know they have to respond to this increased interest. Organizations, and scholarly research, have questions on whether ESG performance and firm operational efficiency relate to each other. Previous evidence on this relationship is mixed. This study delves more deeply to help identify whether context, especially supply chain characteristics provide insights into this relationship. Thus, we explore how an important external supply chain relational characteristic—supply chain concentration—moderates this relationship. We use a sample of 41,717 firm-year observations of 4772 Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 to investigate these relationships. The findings reveal that environmental dimensions have a significant <em>negative</em> relationship to corporate operational efficiency. Social and governance dimensions have significant <em>positive</em> relationships to corporate operational efficiency. Interestingly, there is an asymmetric moderation result. Supplier concentration significantly moderates the relationship between environmental performance and operational efficiency; customer concentration significantly moderates the relationships between both social and governance performance and operational efficiency. The study also sheds light on the relationships between contextual factors and operational efficiency, with firm age, board independence, revenue growth and financial leverage all significantly relate to corporate efficiency. The research findings provide valuable insights for practitioners. The findings also bring up additional questions for supply chain sustainability researchers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 104446"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525004879","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and performance are of interest to diverse stakeholders. Organizations know they have to respond to this increased interest. Organizations, and scholarly research, have questions on whether ESG performance and firm operational efficiency relate to each other. Previous evidence on this relationship is mixed. This study delves more deeply to help identify whether context, especially supply chain characteristics provide insights into this relationship. Thus, we explore how an important external supply chain relational characteristic—supply chain concentration—moderates this relationship. We use a sample of 41,717 firm-year observations of 4772 Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 to investigate these relationships. The findings reveal that environmental dimensions have a significant negative relationship to corporate operational efficiency. Social and governance dimensions have significant positive relationships to corporate operational efficiency. Interestingly, there is an asymmetric moderation result. Supplier concentration significantly moderates the relationship between environmental performance and operational efficiency; customer concentration significantly moderates the relationships between both social and governance performance and operational efficiency. The study also sheds light on the relationships between contextual factors and operational efficiency, with firm age, board independence, revenue growth and financial leverage all significantly relate to corporate efficiency. The research findings provide valuable insights for practitioners. The findings also bring up additional questions for supply chain sustainability researchers.
企业ESG绩效与运营效率:供应链集中度的调节作用
环境、社会和治理(ESG)实践和绩效是各种利益相关者感兴趣的。组织知道他们必须对这种增长的兴趣做出反应。组织和学术研究对ESG绩效和公司运营效率是否相互关联存在疑问。之前关于这种关系的证据好坏参半。本研究进行了更深入的研究,以帮助确定环境,特别是供应链特征是否提供了对这种关系的见解。因此,我们探讨了一个重要的外部供应链关系特征——供应链集中度——如何调节这种关系。我们使用2010年至2023年4772家中国a股上市公司的41717个公司年观察样本来研究这些关系。研究发现,环境维度与企业运营效率之间存在显著的负相关关系。社会和治理维度对公司运营效率有显著的正相关关系。有趣的是,有一个不对称的调节结果。供应商集中度显著调节了环境绩效与运营效率之间的关系;客户集中度显著调节社会和治理绩效与运营效率之间的关系。该研究还揭示了背景因素与运营效率之间的关系,公司年龄、董事会独立性、收入增长和财务杠杆都与公司效率显著相关。研究结果为实践者提供了有价值的见解。这些发现也给供应链可持续性研究人员带来了额外的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信