Intimate Partner Violence: A Mixed Methods Case Series that Focuses on a Subgroup of Minority Patients With Cancer.

IF 1.4
Sanjna Rajput, Aminah Jatoi, Elizabeth J Cathcart-Rake
{"title":"Intimate Partner Violence: A Mixed Methods Case Series that Focuses on a Subgroup of Minority Patients With Cancer.","authors":"Sanjna Rajput, Aminah Jatoi, Elizabeth J Cathcart-Rake","doi":"10.1177/10499091251381773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSexual and gender diverse (SGD) individuals comprise nearly 10% of the United States' population but remain underrepresented in cancer research, particularly in intimate partner violence (IPV) studies. Although IPV rates are comparable or higher in SGD individuals than in non-SGD individuals, the literature on IPV in SGD patients with cancer remains sparse.MethodsThis qualitative study was conducted within a Mayo Clinic IRB-approved parent database on SGD patients with cancer. Eligible patients were adults who self-identified as non-heterosexual or non-cisgender, had an invasive cancer diagnosis, and reported IPV via a four-question screening tool. A detailed medical review was performed to extract qualitative data related to IPV and other violence. Two investigators employed thematic analyses to understand these qualitative data.ResultsAmong 258 SGD patients whose medical records were screened, 13 (5%) reported IPV. Six key themes emerged: (1) IPV co-occurred with other violence (childhood, workplace, sexual violence); (2) IPV was associated with mental health conditions (depression, PTSD, suicidality); (3) Unhealthy coping mechanisms (substance use, risky behaviors) were common; (4) Social isolation and lack of support exacerbated challenges; (5) Internalized stigma influenced self-perception, relationships, healthcare experiences; (6) Chronic stress from cumulative trauma negatively impacted cancer care.ConclusionIPV was reported by a small proportion of SGD cancer patients, and cause and effect associations been IPV and the above themes have not been demonstrated. These findings suggest a need for trauma-informed, culturally competent interventions to address IPV and its broader psychosocial effects in these underserved populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"1212-1218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251381773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSexual and gender diverse (SGD) individuals comprise nearly 10% of the United States' population but remain underrepresented in cancer research, particularly in intimate partner violence (IPV) studies. Although IPV rates are comparable or higher in SGD individuals than in non-SGD individuals, the literature on IPV in SGD patients with cancer remains sparse.MethodsThis qualitative study was conducted within a Mayo Clinic IRB-approved parent database on SGD patients with cancer. Eligible patients were adults who self-identified as non-heterosexual or non-cisgender, had an invasive cancer diagnosis, and reported IPV via a four-question screening tool. A detailed medical review was performed to extract qualitative data related to IPV and other violence. Two investigators employed thematic analyses to understand these qualitative data.ResultsAmong 258 SGD patients whose medical records were screened, 13 (5%) reported IPV. Six key themes emerged: (1) IPV co-occurred with other violence (childhood, workplace, sexual violence); (2) IPV was associated with mental health conditions (depression, PTSD, suicidality); (3) Unhealthy coping mechanisms (substance use, risky behaviors) were common; (4) Social isolation and lack of support exacerbated challenges; (5) Internalized stigma influenced self-perception, relationships, healthcare experiences; (6) Chronic stress from cumulative trauma negatively impacted cancer care.ConclusionIPV was reported by a small proportion of SGD cancer patients, and cause and effect associations been IPV and the above themes have not been demonstrated. These findings suggest a need for trauma-informed, culturally competent interventions to address IPV and its broader psychosocial effects in these underserved populations.

亲密伴侣暴力:一个混合方法的案例系列,重点关注少数群体癌症患者。
性和性别多样性(SGD)个体占美国人口的近10%,但在癌症研究中,特别是在亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)研究中,代表性仍然不足。虽然SGD患者的IPV率与非SGD患者相当或更高,但关于SGD合并癌症患者IPV的文献仍然很少。方法本定性研究是在梅奥诊所irb批准的SGD合并癌症患者的母数据库中进行的。符合条件的患者是自我认定为非异性恋或非顺性的成年人,有浸润性癌症诊断,并通过四题筛查工具报告IPV。进行了详细的医疗审查,以提取与IPV和其他暴力有关的定性数据。两位研究者采用主题分析来理解这些定性数据。结果258例SGD患者中,有13例(5%)报告IPV。出现了六个关键主题:(1)IPV与其他暴力(儿童暴力、工作场所暴力、性暴力)同时发生;(2) IPV与心理健康状况(抑郁、创伤后应激障碍、自杀)相关;(3)不健康的应对机制(药物使用、危险行为)较为普遍;(4)社会孤立和缺乏支持加剧了挑战;(5)内化污名影响自我知觉、人际关系、医疗体验;(6)慢性创伤应激对癌症治疗有负面影响。结论小比例SGD肿瘤患者报告了IPV, IPV与上述主题的因果关系尚未得到证实。这些发现表明,在这些服务不足的人群中,有必要采取创伤知情的、具有文化能力的干预措施,以解决IPV及其更广泛的社会心理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书