Gut Microbiota Perturbation Are Linked to Endoscopic Severity of Diverticular Disease.

IF 2
Antonio Tursi, Giorgia Procaccianti, Silvia Turroni, Rudi De Bastiani, Federica D'Amico, Leonardo Allegretta, Natale Antonino, Elisabetta Baldi, Carlo Casamassima, Giovanni Casella, Mario Ciuffi, Marco De Bastiani, Lorenzo Lazzarotto, Claudio Licci, Maurizio Mancuso, Antonio Penna, Giuseppe Pranzo, Guido Sanna, Cesare Tosetti, Maria Zamparella, Marcello Picchio
{"title":"Gut Microbiota Perturbation Are Linked to Endoscopic Severity of Diverticular Disease.","authors":"Antonio Tursi, Giorgia Procaccianti, Silvia Turroni, Rudi De Bastiani, Federica D'Amico, Leonardo Allegretta, Natale Antonino, Elisabetta Baldi, Carlo Casamassima, Giovanni Casella, Mario Ciuffi, Marco De Bastiani, Lorenzo Lazzarotto, Claudio Licci, Maurizio Mancuso, Antonio Penna, Giuseppe Pranzo, Guido Sanna, Cesare Tosetti, Maria Zamparella, Marcello Picchio","doi":"10.15403/jgld-6308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>It is not known whether the gut microbiota (GM) may vary according to the endoscopic severity of diverticular disease (DD). We aimed to profile the GM in DD patients according to the severity of the diverticular inflammation and complication assessment (DICA) classification (DICA 1 vs. DICA 2 vs. DICA 3).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed the GM in a population of patients with DD. We analyzed stool samples collected by fecal swab for microbiological studies. Among them, we identified DD patients in whom DD was scored according to DICA classification. The severity of the abdominal pain was measured using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GM of 71 DD patients [49 (69.0%) were scored as DICA1, 18 (25.4%) as DICA2, and 4 (5.6%) as DICA3 was analysed. The three groups did not differ in alpha diversity, but significantly separated in the PCoA of beta diversity (p=0.018). Taxonomically, DICA1 group was characterized by higher relative abundances of the phylum Actinobacteriota, the families Erysipelatoclostridiaceae and Bacteroidaceae, and the genera Lachnospiraceae ND3007 group and Bacteroides (p≤0.1); DICA2 group was mainly discriminated by higher proportions of Streptococcaceae (p=0.018); DICA3 group was mainly discriminated by the phylum Bacteroidota, the families Prevotellaceae and Succinivibrionaceae, and the genera Prevotella, Alloprevotella and Dialister (p≤0.045). Stratifiyng patients by abdominal pain severity, only for the DICA2 group the PCoA of beta diversity showed a significant separation between the moderate and severe groups (p=0.024), with the latter also showing higher alpha diversity (p=0.05). Taxonomically, the severe group was enriched in the families Enterobacteriaceae and Erysipelotrichaceae, and the genera Megasphaera and Veillonella, while depleted in Sutterellaceae and Blautia compared to the moderate group (p≤0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GM in DD may vary according to endoscopic disease severity and clinical characteristics. Such associations may improve patient stratification and clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":"34 3","pages":"317-322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-6308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: It is not known whether the gut microbiota (GM) may vary according to the endoscopic severity of diverticular disease (DD). We aimed to profile the GM in DD patients according to the severity of the diverticular inflammation and complication assessment (DICA) classification (DICA 1 vs. DICA 2 vs. DICA 3).

Methods: We retrospectively assessed the GM in a population of patients with DD. We analyzed stool samples collected by fecal swab for microbiological studies. Among them, we identified DD patients in whom DD was scored according to DICA classification. The severity of the abdominal pain was measured using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results: The GM of 71 DD patients [49 (69.0%) were scored as DICA1, 18 (25.4%) as DICA2, and 4 (5.6%) as DICA3 was analysed. The three groups did not differ in alpha diversity, but significantly separated in the PCoA of beta diversity (p=0.018). Taxonomically, DICA1 group was characterized by higher relative abundances of the phylum Actinobacteriota, the families Erysipelatoclostridiaceae and Bacteroidaceae, and the genera Lachnospiraceae ND3007 group and Bacteroides (p≤0.1); DICA2 group was mainly discriminated by higher proportions of Streptococcaceae (p=0.018); DICA3 group was mainly discriminated by the phylum Bacteroidota, the families Prevotellaceae and Succinivibrionaceae, and the genera Prevotella, Alloprevotella and Dialister (p≤0.045). Stratifiyng patients by abdominal pain severity, only for the DICA2 group the PCoA of beta diversity showed a significant separation between the moderate and severe groups (p=0.024), with the latter also showing higher alpha diversity (p=0.05). Taxonomically, the severe group was enriched in the families Enterobacteriaceae and Erysipelotrichaceae, and the genera Megasphaera and Veillonella, while depleted in Sutterellaceae and Blautia compared to the moderate group (p≤0.08).

Conclusions: GM in DD may vary according to endoscopic disease severity and clinical characteristics. Such associations may improve patient stratification and clinical management.

肠道菌群紊乱与憩室疾病的内镜严重程度有关。
背景和目的:目前尚不清楚肠道微生物群(GM)是否会根据憩室病(DD)的内镜严重程度而变化。我们的目的是根据憩室炎症的严重程度和并发症评估(DICA)分类(DICA 1、DICA 2、DICA 3)来分析DD患者的GM。方法:我们回顾性地评估了DD患者群体中的GM。我们分析了通过粪便拭子收集的粪便样本进行微生物学研究。其中,我们选取DD患者,根据DICA分类进行DD评分。采用10分视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量腹痛的严重程度。结果:71例DD患者中,DICA1评分49例(69.0%),DICA2评分18例(25.4%),DICA3评分4例(5.6%)。3组α多样性差异不显著,但β多样性PCoA差异显著(p=0.018)。分类学上,DICA1组放线菌门、丹毒杆菌科和拟杆菌科、毛缕菌科ND3007组和拟杆菌属相对丰度较高(p≤0.1);DICA2组以较高的链球菌科比例为主(p=0.018);DICA3组主要以拟杆菌门、普氏菌科和琥珀弧菌科以及普氏菌属、异普氏菌属和Dialister属鉴别(p≤0.045)。根据患者的腹痛严重程度进行分层,只有DICA2组的β多样性PCoA在中度组和重度组之间存在显著差异(p=0.024),后者也具有更高的α多样性(p=0.05)。在分类学上,重度组肠杆菌科、丹毒杆菌科、巨藻属、微藻属富集,而Sutterellaceae和Blautia较中度组富集(p≤0.08)。结论:DD的GM可能根据内镜下疾病的严重程度和临床特征而有所不同。这种关联可以改善患者分层和临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信