Managing Occluded Uncovered Self-expanding Metal Stents in Patients with Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2
Jakub Pietrzak, Adam Przybyłkowski
{"title":"Managing Occluded Uncovered Self-expanding Metal Stents in Patients with Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Jakub Pietrzak, Adam Przybyłkowski","doi":"10.15403/jgld-6215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The implantation of uncovered self-expanding metal stents (UCSEMS) is an established method for the palliative treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). However, with advances in chemotherapy extending patient survival, individuals treated primarily with UCSEMS increasingly encounter overgrowth of the tumour in the stent lumen and occlusion. In this study, we aimed to compare various methods of managing occluded UCSEMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed a cohort of 49 patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction who were treated with UCSEMS implantation as first-line endoscopic treatment. We evaluated their follow-up data, recorded complications, and assessed the methods used to manage occluded stents: balloon cleaning, plastic stent in stent implantation, UCSEMS stent in stent implantation, fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) stent in stent implantation and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical and clinical success rates of the reinterventions were 91.2% and 61.4%, respectively. Depending on the type of revisionary drainage method used, clinical success rates were as follows: 50% for balloon cleaning only, 66% for plastic stent placement, 68% for FCSEMS stent placement, 80% for RFA with simultaneous plastic stent placement, and 80% for UCSEMS stent placement (p=0.366). The mean time to the second reintervention (second ERCP after UCSEMS placement) was 238, 201, 264, 78, and 205 days, respectively (p=0.4999). The mean interval time for all reinterventions was 48, 75, 71, 66, and 95 days, respectively (p=0.0326).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All techniques demonstrated high technical feasibility. While UCSEMS re-stenting and RFA with plastic stents showed promising trends in clinical success and stent patency, definitive conclusions about superiority cannot be drawn. Further multicentre prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":"34 3","pages":"339-342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-6215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The implantation of uncovered self-expanding metal stents (UCSEMS) is an established method for the palliative treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). However, with advances in chemotherapy extending patient survival, individuals treated primarily with UCSEMS increasingly encounter overgrowth of the tumour in the stent lumen and occlusion. In this study, we aimed to compare various methods of managing occluded UCSEMS.

Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 49 patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction who were treated with UCSEMS implantation as first-line endoscopic treatment. We evaluated their follow-up data, recorded complications, and assessed the methods used to manage occluded stents: balloon cleaning, plastic stent in stent implantation, UCSEMS stent in stent implantation, fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) stent in stent implantation and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Results: Technical and clinical success rates of the reinterventions were 91.2% and 61.4%, respectively. Depending on the type of revisionary drainage method used, clinical success rates were as follows: 50% for balloon cleaning only, 66% for plastic stent placement, 68% for FCSEMS stent placement, 80% for RFA with simultaneous plastic stent placement, and 80% for UCSEMS stent placement (p=0.366). The mean time to the second reintervention (second ERCP after UCSEMS placement) was 238, 201, 264, 78, and 205 days, respectively (p=0.4999). The mean interval time for all reinterventions was 48, 75, 71, 66, and 95 days, respectively (p=0.0326).

Conclusions: All techniques demonstrated high technical feasibility. While UCSEMS re-stenting and RFA with plastic stents showed promising trends in clinical success and stent patency, definitive conclusions about superiority cannot be drawn. Further multicentre prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

恶性肝门胆道梗阻患者未覆盖自扩张金属支架的处理:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景与目的:无盖自膨胀金属支架(UCSEMS)植入术是恶性肝门胆道梗阻(MHBO)姑息性治疗的一种成熟方法。然而,随着化疗的进展延长了患者的生存期,主要使用UCSEMS治疗的个体越来越多地遇到支架腔内肿瘤过度生长和闭塞的情况。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较各种治疗闭塞UCSEMS的方法。方法:我们对49例采用UCSEMS植入作为一线内镜治疗的恶性肝门胆道梗阻患者进行队列分析。我们评估了他们的随访数据,记录了并发症,并评估了用于治疗闭塞支架的方法:球囊清洗、支架植入中的塑料支架、支架植入中的UCSEMS支架、支架植入中的全覆盖自膨胀金属支架(fcems)支架和射频消融(RFA)。结果:再干预的技术成功率为91.2%,临床成功率为61.4%。根据所使用的修正引流方法的类型,临床成功率如下:仅球囊清洗50%,放置塑料支架66%,放置fcems支架68%,RFA同时放置塑料支架80%,放置UCSEMS支架80% (p=0.366)。第二次再干预(植入UCSEMS后的第二次ERCP)的平均时间分别为238、201、264、78和205天(p=0.4999)。所有再干预的平均间隔时间分别为48、75、71、66和95天(p=0.0326)。结论:各项技术均具有较高的技术可行性。虽然UCSEMS再支架置入术和塑料支架RFA在临床成功和支架通畅方面显示出有希望的趋势,但无法得出关于其优越性的明确结论。需要进一步的多中心前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信