Willingness to develop an advance directive: perspectives of older persons at a national referral hospital in Uganda.

IF 3.1 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Catherine Alupo, Erisa S Mwaka, Betty Kwagala, Joseph Ochieng
{"title":"Willingness to develop an advance directive: perspectives of older persons at a national referral hospital in Uganda.","authors":"Catherine Alupo, Erisa S Mwaka, Betty Kwagala, Joseph Ochieng","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01287-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the treatment preferences of terminally ill patients is critical for the provision of quality care at the end of life. However, there is limited literature on the perspectives and willingness to develop advance directives among older persons in low-resource settings. This study explored the perspectives and willingness of older persons to develop an advance directive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative study that involved older persons aged 60 years and over at a national referral hospital in Uganda. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was performed, and the findings were reported using themes along with illustrative quotes from the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 15 participants with an average age of 65.5 years (SD 4.4); most were male (10/15), married (12/15), and unemployed (10/15). Three themes were identified from the data, including: (1) understanding of advance directives, (2) perceptions about advance directives, and (3) willingness to develop advance directives. Most respondents had a limited understanding of advance directives. Advance directives were perceived as a foreign practice that was only applicable to the very sick and terminally ill. However, respondents were willing to develop advance directives for several reasons, including autonomy over one's health and the need to prevent family suffering and conflict in the event of death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed a general lack of awareness and limited understanding of advance directives. There is a need for public sensitization on the importance of advance directives to healthcare practice and among older persons, given their high risk of morbidity and mortality due to aging. Promoting the use of advance directives in healthcare practice ethically recognizes one's autonomous rights of self-control.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01287-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding the treatment preferences of terminally ill patients is critical for the provision of quality care at the end of life. However, there is limited literature on the perspectives and willingness to develop advance directives among older persons in low-resource settings. This study explored the perspectives and willingness of older persons to develop an advance directive.

Methods: This was a qualitative study that involved older persons aged 60 years and over at a national referral hospital in Uganda. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was performed, and the findings were reported using themes along with illustrative quotes from the participants.

Results: The study included 15 participants with an average age of 65.5 years (SD 4.4); most were male (10/15), married (12/15), and unemployed (10/15). Three themes were identified from the data, including: (1) understanding of advance directives, (2) perceptions about advance directives, and (3) willingness to develop advance directives. Most respondents had a limited understanding of advance directives. Advance directives were perceived as a foreign practice that was only applicable to the very sick and terminally ill. However, respondents were willing to develop advance directives for several reasons, including autonomy over one's health and the need to prevent family suffering and conflict in the event of death.

Conclusion: The study revealed a general lack of awareness and limited understanding of advance directives. There is a need for public sensitization on the importance of advance directives to healthcare practice and among older persons, given their high risk of morbidity and mortality due to aging. Promoting the use of advance directives in healthcare practice ethically recognizes one's autonomous rights of self-control.

制定预先指示的意愿:乌干达一家国家转诊医院老年人的观点。
背景:了解晚期患者的治疗偏好对于提供高质量的临终护理至关重要。然而,在资源匮乏的环境中,关于老年人制定预先指示的观点和意愿的文献有限。本研究探讨了老年人制定预先指示的观点和意愿。方法:这是一项定性研究,涉及乌干达一家国家转诊医院60岁及以上的老年人。通过深入访谈收集数据,并逐字记录。进行主题分析,并使用主题和参与者的说明性引用来报告调查结果。结果:研究纳入15名参与者,平均年龄65.5岁(SD 4.4);大多数是男性(10/15),已婚(12/15),无业(10/15)。从数据中确定了三个主题,包括:(1)对临终关怀指示的理解,(2)对临终关怀指示的看法,(3)制定临终关怀指示的意愿。大多数受访者对预先指示的理解有限。事先指示被认为是一种外国做法,只适用于重病和绝症患者。然而,答复者愿意制定预先指示有几个原因,包括对个人健康的自主以及在死亡情况下需要防止家庭痛苦和冲突。结论:该研究揭示了普遍缺乏意识和有限的理解预先指示。鉴于老年人发病率和死亡率高,有必要提高公众和老年人对预先指示对保健实践的重要性的认识。促进使用预先指示在医疗保健实践伦理承认一个人的自主权利的自我控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信