Navigating the path to planned endings: understanding Chinese older adults' engagement with advance care planning through constructivist grounded theory.

IF 3.1 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Wenyu Yue, Qing Chu, Xiaoqin Ma
{"title":"Navigating the path to planned endings: understanding Chinese older adults' engagement with advance care planning through constructivist grounded theory.","authors":"Wenyu Yue, Qing Chu, Xiaoqin Ma","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01278-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advance care planning implementation reveals complex tensions between ethical principles and cultural-specific moral frameworks. Within the Chinese healthcare context, medical decision-making operates within a unique ethical landscape shaped by Confucian values, yet systematic ACP promotion in this context remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to (1) develop a grounded theory of older adults' engagement with advance care planning in the Chinese context; (2) understand how participants navigate decision-making processes within China's cultural and healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The investigation employed Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory methodology guided by Nie's framework of Chinese medical ethics through a three-stage approach across diverse geographical regions in China.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-five participants (13 males/12 females) aged 60-95 years from representative regions of China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory methodology, data collection progressed from pre-experimental convenience sampling (3 participants), to Stage 1 purposive sampling (12), and Stage 2 theoretical sampling (13) until saturation. Analysis employed concurrent interviews and constant comparative methods guided by Chinese medical ethical principles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis produced the substantive theory \"Navigating the Path to Planned Endings,\" encompassing three interconnected categories: Negotiating Death Discourse, The Locus of Decision, and Systemic Support Infrastructure. \"The Locus of Decision\" emerged as the core category where participants reconcile individual autonomy, filial obligations, and family harmony.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The theoretical framework reveals complex ethical processes through which Chinese older adults engage with advance care planning, highlighting the crucial role of moral agency where traditional values and modern bioethical principles intersect. These findings necessitate culturally sensitive ACP implementation approaches acknowledging family roles while upholding principles of autonomy and justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01278-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning implementation reveals complex tensions between ethical principles and cultural-specific moral frameworks. Within the Chinese healthcare context, medical decision-making operates within a unique ethical landscape shaped by Confucian values, yet systematic ACP promotion in this context remains limited.

Objective: This study aims to (1) develop a grounded theory of older adults' engagement with advance care planning in the Chinese context; (2) understand how participants navigate decision-making processes within China's cultural and healthcare systems.

Design: The investigation employed Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory methodology guided by Nie's framework of Chinese medical ethics through a three-stage approach across diverse geographical regions in China.

Participants: Twenty-five participants (13 males/12 females) aged 60-95 years from representative regions of China.

Methods: Following Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory methodology, data collection progressed from pre-experimental convenience sampling (3 participants), to Stage 1 purposive sampling (12), and Stage 2 theoretical sampling (13) until saturation. Analysis employed concurrent interviews and constant comparative methods guided by Chinese medical ethical principles.

Results: The analysis produced the substantive theory "Navigating the Path to Planned Endings," encompassing three interconnected categories: Negotiating Death Discourse, The Locus of Decision, and Systemic Support Infrastructure. "The Locus of Decision" emerged as the core category where participants reconcile individual autonomy, filial obligations, and family harmony.

Conclusions: The theoretical framework reveals complex ethical processes through which Chinese older adults engage with advance care planning, highlighting the crucial role of moral agency where traditional values and modern bioethical principles intersect. These findings necessitate culturally sensitive ACP implementation approaches acknowledging family roles while upholding principles of autonomy and justice.

导航到有计划的结局之路:通过建构主义理论理解中国老年人对预先护理计划的参与。
背景:预先护理计划的实施揭示了伦理原则和特定文化道德框架之间复杂的紧张关系。在中国的医疗环境中,医疗决策是在儒家价值观形成的独特伦理环境中运作的,但在这种背景下,系统的ACP推广仍然有限。目的:本研究旨在(1)建立中国情境下老年人参与预先护理计划的理论基础;(2)了解参与者如何在中国的文化和医疗体系中导航决策过程。设计:调查采用Charmaz的建构主义扎根理论方法论,以聂的中国医学伦理学框架为指导,通过三个阶段的方法在中国不同的地理区域进行。参与者:25人,男13人,女12人,年龄60-95岁,来自中国代表性地区。方法:按照Charmaz的建构主义扎根理论方法,从实验前的便利抽样(3名参与者),到第一阶段的目的抽样(12名参与者),再到第二阶段的理论抽样(13名参与者),直到饱和。分析采用并行访谈和持续比较的方法,遵循中国医学伦理原则。结果:分析产生了实质性的理论“导航路径计划结束”,包括三个相互关联的类别:谈判死亡话语,决策的轨迹和系统支持基础设施。“决策轨迹”是参与者协调个人自主、孝道义务和家庭和谐的核心类别。结论:该理论框架揭示了中国老年人参与预先护理计划的复杂伦理过程,突出了传统价值观和现代生物伦理原则交叉的道德代理的关键作用。这些发现需要在文化上敏感的非加太执行方法,承认家庭的作用,同时坚持自主和正义的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信