Association of Documented High Blood Pressure Measurements with Time to Hypertension Diagnosis.

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cole G Chapman, Philip M Polgreen, Manish Suneja, Barry L Carter, Linnea A Polgreen
{"title":"Association of Documented High Blood Pressure Measurements with Time to Hypertension Diagnosis.","authors":"Cole G Chapman, Philip M Polgreen, Manish Suneja, Barry L Carter, Linnea A Polgreen","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.09.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnostic delays contribute to uncontrolled hypertension, leading to increased morbidity, mortality and costs. The goal of this study was to estimate the duration of delays in the diagnosis of hypertension that contribute to uncontrolled hypertension in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data from the electronic health record for University of Iowa Healthcare from 2016-2022 for all patients with any BP record of 130/80 mmHg or greater but without an initial hypertension diagnosis. We used a Cox Proportional Hazards Model to determine the length of diagnostic delay as well as risk factors for delay. We specifically examined the presence of provider notes discussing BP or hypertension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 5% of our cohort with BP readings of 130/80 mm Hg or greater were diagnosed with hypertension at the first visit. At one month, 7.4% were diagnosed, 10% within 3 months, increasing to 14% at 12 months. Most patients remained undiagnosed after at 12 months and 75% remained undiagnosed at 5 years. Shorter delays were associated with higher BP values, prior diagnoses of \"high BP, not hypertension\" and prior clinical notes discussing BP or hypertension. Shorter delays were also associated with other cardiovascular diagnoses, primary-care visits and inpatient stays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the large number of missed opportunities to diagnose hypertension and demonstrate compelling reasons for improving clinical documentation related to high BP readings and increasing primary-care visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.09.024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnostic delays contribute to uncontrolled hypertension, leading to increased morbidity, mortality and costs. The goal of this study was to estimate the duration of delays in the diagnosis of hypertension that contribute to uncontrolled hypertension in the US.

Methods: We collected data from the electronic health record for University of Iowa Healthcare from 2016-2022 for all patients with any BP record of 130/80 mmHg or greater but without an initial hypertension diagnosis. We used a Cox Proportional Hazards Model to determine the length of diagnostic delay as well as risk factors for delay. We specifically examined the presence of provider notes discussing BP or hypertension.

Results: Only 5% of our cohort with BP readings of 130/80 mm Hg or greater were diagnosed with hypertension at the first visit. At one month, 7.4% were diagnosed, 10% within 3 months, increasing to 14% at 12 months. Most patients remained undiagnosed after at 12 months and 75% remained undiagnosed at 5 years. Shorter delays were associated with higher BP values, prior diagnoses of "high BP, not hypertension" and prior clinical notes discussing BP or hypertension. Shorter delays were also associated with other cardiovascular diagnoses, primary-care visits and inpatient stays.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the large number of missed opportunities to diagnose hypertension and demonstrate compelling reasons for improving clinical documentation related to high BP readings and increasing primary-care visits.

记录的高血压测量与高血压诊断时间的关系。
诊断延误导致高血压无法控制,导致发病率、死亡率和费用增加。本研究的目的是估计美国高血压诊断延误的持续时间,这有助于高血压不受控制。方法:我们从2016-2022年爱荷华大学医疗保健中心的电子健康记录中收集了所有血压记录为130/80 mmHg或更高但没有初始高血压诊断的患者的数据。我们使用Cox比例风险模型来确定诊断延迟的长度以及延迟的危险因素。我们特别检查了讨论血压或高血压的医生记录。结果:在我们的队列中,只有5%的血压读数为130/80 mm Hg或更高的患者在第一次就诊时被诊断为高血压。1个月确诊率为7.4%,3个月确诊率为10%,12个月确诊率为14%。大多数患者在12个月后仍未确诊,75%的患者在5年未确诊。较短的延迟与较高的血压值、先前诊断为“高血压而非高血压”以及先前讨论血压或高血压的临床记录有关。较短的延迟也与其他心血管诊断、初级保健就诊和住院时间有关。结论:我们的研究结果强调了大量错过的高血压诊断机会,并证明了改善与高血压读数相关的临床文件和增加初级保健就诊的令人信服的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信