Forest Therapy Trails: Development and Application of an Assessment Protocol.

3区 综合性期刊
Paul H Gobster
{"title":"Forest Therapy Trails: Development and Application of an Assessment Protocol.","authors":"Paul H Gobster","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22091440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What key characteristics of forest sites and trails contribute to enjoyable and healthy immersive nature experiences for visitors? Previous research has helped identify the conceptual structure and criteria important in facilitating successful experiences, but there remains a knowledge gap in translating this information into operational guidelines. To address this gap, the present work used a descriptive inventory approach combining field research with a variety of secondary data to develop a protocol for assessing four site level criteria (beauty, integrity, tranquility, accessibility) and six trail level criteria (ease of travel, attractiveness of layout, natural features, built features, explorable nature, interpretation and stewardship). Through an iterative process, the protocol was refined and applied to selected sites (<i>n</i> = 56) and trails (<i>n</i> = 157) in two study areas in metropolitan Chicago, Illinois, and the rural Northwoods of Wisconsin. Qualitative and quantitative information describes preferred conditions across criteria, while quantitative ratings highlight commonalities and differences between urban and rural sites and trails. Although the principal focus was on foot trails, sub-analyses show how the criteria can apply to bike and paddle trails. With regional adaptations, the protocol has utility for the planning and design of new and management of existing trails for the growing practice of forest therapy and related forms of nature-based recreation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What key characteristics of forest sites and trails contribute to enjoyable and healthy immersive nature experiences for visitors? Previous research has helped identify the conceptual structure and criteria important in facilitating successful experiences, but there remains a knowledge gap in translating this information into operational guidelines. To address this gap, the present work used a descriptive inventory approach combining field research with a variety of secondary data to develop a protocol for assessing four site level criteria (beauty, integrity, tranquility, accessibility) and six trail level criteria (ease of travel, attractiveness of layout, natural features, built features, explorable nature, interpretation and stewardship). Through an iterative process, the protocol was refined and applied to selected sites (n = 56) and trails (n = 157) in two study areas in metropolitan Chicago, Illinois, and the rural Northwoods of Wisconsin. Qualitative and quantitative information describes preferred conditions across criteria, while quantitative ratings highlight commonalities and differences between urban and rural sites and trails. Although the principal focus was on foot trails, sub-analyses show how the criteria can apply to bike and paddle trails. With regional adaptations, the protocol has utility for the planning and design of new and management of existing trails for the growing practice of forest therapy and related forms of nature-based recreation.

森林治疗路径:评估协议的发展和应用。
森林地点和步道的主要特点是什么,有助于为游客提供愉快和健康的沉浸式自然体验?以前的研究已经帮助确定了促进成功经验的重要概念结构和标准,但在将这些信息转化为操作指南方面仍然存在知识差距。为了解决这一差距,目前的工作使用了一种描述性清单方法,将实地研究与各种次要数据相结合,制定了一个评估四个站点级别标准(美丽、完整性、宁静、可达性)和六个步道级别标准(旅行便利性、布局吸引力、自然特征、建筑特征、可探索性、解释和管理)的方案。通过迭代过程,该方案被改进并应用于伊利诺斯州芝加哥大都市和威斯康星州北森林农村两个研究区域的选定地点(n = 56)和小径(n = 157)。定性和定量信息描述了不同标准的首选条件,而定量评级强调了城市和农村地点和小径之间的共性和差异。虽然主要关注的是步行道,但子分析显示了这些标准如何适用于自行车和划桨道。通过区域调整,该协议对规划和设计新的小径和管理现有小径具有实用价值,以促进森林疗法和相关形式的自然娱乐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信