{"title":"The Healing Environment for Healthcare Staff in Paediatric Settings: A Cross-National Semi-Structured Survey on Healthcare Staff Satisfaction.","authors":"Silvia Mangili, Beatrice Pattaro, Andrea Brambilla, Gaia Ferraguzzi, Cristiana Caira, Stefano Capolongo","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22091444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The existing literature emphasises that the hospital environment plays a critical role in the experiences of patients and healthcare workers. To better understand the perspectives of healthcare staff in such settings, a questionnaire-based study was conducted at two paediatric hospitals: Vittore Buzzi Hospital (Milan, Italy) and Queen Silvia Children's Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study had two main objectives: to collect feedback from healthcare staff via a post-occupancy evaluation focused on perceived environmental quality and to compare staff perceptions across different geographical and cultural contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A semi-structured survey tool consisting of 42 closed-ended items (40 of which used a 5-point Likert scale) and 2 open-ended questions was employed. The items assessed the presence and quality of specific environmental and functional features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings reveal significant contrasts between the two hospitals. Staff at the Swedish hospital reported higher satisfaction levels across most areas, whereas the Italian hospital demonstrated significant shortcomings. Common concerns in both hospitals included limited space for medical and administrative staff and the absence of private offices for doctors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms that environmental quality affects not only patients, but also staff, impacting their satisfaction, perceived efficiency, and emotional well-being. The contrasting outcomes highlight the significant influence that differences in architectural design, spatial layout, and investment in staff-oriented spaces can have on the day-to-day experiences of healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The existing literature emphasises that the hospital environment plays a critical role in the experiences of patients and healthcare workers. To better understand the perspectives of healthcare staff in such settings, a questionnaire-based study was conducted at two paediatric hospitals: Vittore Buzzi Hospital (Milan, Italy) and Queen Silvia Children's Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden).
Objective: The study had two main objectives: to collect feedback from healthcare staff via a post-occupancy evaluation focused on perceived environmental quality and to compare staff perceptions across different geographical and cultural contexts.
Methods: A semi-structured survey tool consisting of 42 closed-ended items (40 of which used a 5-point Likert scale) and 2 open-ended questions was employed. The items assessed the presence and quality of specific environmental and functional features.
Results: The findings reveal significant contrasts between the two hospitals. Staff at the Swedish hospital reported higher satisfaction levels across most areas, whereas the Italian hospital demonstrated significant shortcomings. Common concerns in both hospitals included limited space for medical and administrative staff and the absence of private offices for doctors.
Conclusions: This study confirms that environmental quality affects not only patients, but also staff, impacting their satisfaction, perceived efficiency, and emotional well-being. The contrasting outcomes highlight the significant influence that differences in architectural design, spatial layout, and investment in staff-oriented spaces can have on the day-to-day experiences of healthcare professionals.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health.
The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.