Associations of Place-Based Factors with Service Use and Consumer-Reported Unmet Service Needs Among Older Adults Using Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services in the United States.
Tetyana P Shippee, Romil R Parikh, Nicholas Musinguzi, Benjamin W Langworthy, Jack M Wolf, Stephanie Giordano, Eric Jutkowitz
{"title":"Associations of Place-Based Factors with Service Use and Consumer-Reported Unmet Service Needs Among Older Adults Using Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services in the United States.","authors":"Tetyana P Shippee, Romil R Parikh, Nicholas Musinguzi, Benjamin W Langworthy, Jack M Wolf, Stephanie Giordano, Eric Jutkowitz","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22091461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to home- and community-based services (HCBS) is critical for aging in place; yet many older adults continue to experience unmet needs. While individual-level factors are better-studied, less is known about how neighborhood-level place-based factors (PBFs, e.g., poverty, housing conditions, transportation, and internet access) shape access to and adequacy of HCBS. This study addresses that gap by examining the added explanatory value of PBFs in predicting HCBS use and unmet needs. We analyzed data from 6558 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 65 years using the 2022-2023 National Core Indicators-Aging & Disability Adult Consumer Survey. Outcomes included use of six HCBS types, consumer-reported unmet needs for each type, and overall unmet HCBS needs. PBFs were measured at the ZIP code level using the 2016-2020 American Community Survey. Nested logistic regression models estimated incremental variance (McFadden's R<sup>2</sup>) explained by PBFs, adjusting for individual demographics, health status, state, and proxy response. Adding PBFs increased explained variance by 7.98-22.70% for HCBS use, 35.92-48.00% for unmet needs by service type, and 51.85% for overall unmet HCBS needs. PBFs meaningfully influence both access to and adequacy of HCBS. Using PBFs to guide resource allocation and targeting modifiable PBFs could improve HCBS access and efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Access to home- and community-based services (HCBS) is critical for aging in place; yet many older adults continue to experience unmet needs. While individual-level factors are better-studied, less is known about how neighborhood-level place-based factors (PBFs, e.g., poverty, housing conditions, transportation, and internet access) shape access to and adequacy of HCBS. This study addresses that gap by examining the added explanatory value of PBFs in predicting HCBS use and unmet needs. We analyzed data from 6558 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 65 years using the 2022-2023 National Core Indicators-Aging & Disability Adult Consumer Survey. Outcomes included use of six HCBS types, consumer-reported unmet needs for each type, and overall unmet HCBS needs. PBFs were measured at the ZIP code level using the 2016-2020 American Community Survey. Nested logistic regression models estimated incremental variance (McFadden's R2) explained by PBFs, adjusting for individual demographics, health status, state, and proxy response. Adding PBFs increased explained variance by 7.98-22.70% for HCBS use, 35.92-48.00% for unmet needs by service type, and 51.85% for overall unmet HCBS needs. PBFs meaningfully influence both access to and adequacy of HCBS. Using PBFs to guide resource allocation and targeting modifiable PBFs could improve HCBS access and efficiency.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health.
The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.