Associations of Place-Based Factors with Service Use and Consumer-Reported Unmet Service Needs Among Older Adults Using Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services in the United States.

3区 综合性期刊
Tetyana P Shippee, Romil R Parikh, Nicholas Musinguzi, Benjamin W Langworthy, Jack M Wolf, Stephanie Giordano, Eric Jutkowitz
{"title":"Associations of Place-Based Factors with Service Use and Consumer-Reported Unmet Service Needs Among Older Adults Using Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services in the United States.","authors":"Tetyana P Shippee, Romil R Parikh, Nicholas Musinguzi, Benjamin W Langworthy, Jack M Wolf, Stephanie Giordano, Eric Jutkowitz","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22091461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to home- and community-based services (HCBS) is critical for aging in place; yet many older adults continue to experience unmet needs. While individual-level factors are better-studied, less is known about how neighborhood-level place-based factors (PBFs, e.g., poverty, housing conditions, transportation, and internet access) shape access to and adequacy of HCBS. This study addresses that gap by examining the added explanatory value of PBFs in predicting HCBS use and unmet needs. We analyzed data from 6558 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 65 years using the 2022-2023 National Core Indicators-Aging & Disability Adult Consumer Survey. Outcomes included use of six HCBS types, consumer-reported unmet needs for each type, and overall unmet HCBS needs. PBFs were measured at the ZIP code level using the 2016-2020 American Community Survey. Nested logistic regression models estimated incremental variance (McFadden's R<sup>2</sup>) explained by PBFs, adjusting for individual demographics, health status, state, and proxy response. Adding PBFs increased explained variance by 7.98-22.70% for HCBS use, 35.92-48.00% for unmet needs by service type, and 51.85% for overall unmet HCBS needs. PBFs meaningfully influence both access to and adequacy of HCBS. Using PBFs to guide resource allocation and targeting modifiable PBFs could improve HCBS access and efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to home- and community-based services (HCBS) is critical for aging in place; yet many older adults continue to experience unmet needs. While individual-level factors are better-studied, less is known about how neighborhood-level place-based factors (PBFs, e.g., poverty, housing conditions, transportation, and internet access) shape access to and adequacy of HCBS. This study addresses that gap by examining the added explanatory value of PBFs in predicting HCBS use and unmet needs. We analyzed data from 6558 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 65 years using the 2022-2023 National Core Indicators-Aging & Disability Adult Consumer Survey. Outcomes included use of six HCBS types, consumer-reported unmet needs for each type, and overall unmet HCBS needs. PBFs were measured at the ZIP code level using the 2016-2020 American Community Survey. Nested logistic regression models estimated incremental variance (McFadden's R2) explained by PBFs, adjusting for individual demographics, health status, state, and proxy response. Adding PBFs increased explained variance by 7.98-22.70% for HCBS use, 35.92-48.00% for unmet needs by service type, and 51.85% for overall unmet HCBS needs. PBFs meaningfully influence both access to and adequacy of HCBS. Using PBFs to guide resource allocation and targeting modifiable PBFs could improve HCBS access and efficiency.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在美国使用公共资助的家庭和社区服务的老年人中,基于地点的因素与服务使用和消费者报告的未满足服务需求的关联。
获得家庭和社区服务(HCBS)对当地的老龄化至关重要;然而,许多老年人的需求仍未得到满足。虽然个人层面的因素得到了更好的研究,但对社区层面的基于地方的因素(pbf,如贫困、住房条件、交通和互联网接入)如何影响HCBS的获取和充分性,我们知之甚少。本研究通过检验pbf在预测HCBS使用和未满足需求方面的附加解释价值来解决这一差距。我们使用2022-2023年国家核心指标-老龄化和残疾成人消费者调查分析了6558名≥65岁的社区居住成年人的数据。结果包括六种HCBS类型的使用情况,消费者报告的每种类型未满足的HCBS需求,以及总体未满足的HCBS需求。pbf使用2016-2020年美国社区调查在邮政编码水平进行测量。嵌套逻辑回归模型估计由pbf解释的增量方差(McFadden's R2),调整了个人人口统计学、健康状况、状态和代理反应。增加pbf使HCBS使用的解释方差增加了7.98-22.70%,按服务类型未满足需求的解释方差增加了35.92-48.00%,总体未满足HCBS需求的解释方差增加了51.85%。pbf对HCBS的获取和充分性都有重大影响。利用pbf来指导资源配置,针对可修改的pbf,可以提高HCBS的可及性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信