Noise Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance Due to Road Traffic and Railway Noise in Germany.

3区 综合性期刊
Sarah Leona Benz, Julia Kuhlmann, Jonas Bilik, Manfred Liepert, Dirk Schreckenberg
{"title":"Noise Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance Due to Road Traffic and Railway Noise in Germany.","authors":"Sarah Leona Benz, Julia Kuhlmann, Jonas Bilik, Manfred Liepert, Dirk Schreckenberg","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22091366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Environmental noise exposure is omnipresent, but the type of noise source and its appraisal may differ in varying contexts. For instance, studies have found significant differences in annoyance ratings between urbanisation levels. In this article, a re-analysis of existing survey data is presented, assessing noise annoyance and sleep disturbance from road traffic and railway noise in a random sample stratified by rural, suburban, and inner-city areas. Noise exposure was estimated using modelled <i>L</i><sub>den</sub> and <i>L</i><sub>night</sub> levels. Exposure-response curves showed greater annoyance at lower road traffic noise levels compared to the WHO guidelines (10% highly annoyed at 35 dB <i>L</i><sub>den</sub> vs. WHO 53 dB <i>L</i><sub>den</sub>). Railway noise annoyance aligned with the WHO estimates; however, sleep disturbance was lower at comparable exposure levels (3% highly sleep-disturbed at 53 dB <i>L</i><sub>night</sub> vs. WHO 44 dB). This re-analysis provides robust exposure-response relationships. The findings indicate higher levels for road traffic noise annoyance in Germany compared to international standards. A resulting policy implication is to link regular population surveys to noise action planning as a form of public participation. This approach enables the development of measures tailored to local conditions and supports the estimation of potential impacts, such as the number of people who may benefit from reduced noise exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental noise exposure is omnipresent, but the type of noise source and its appraisal may differ in varying contexts. For instance, studies have found significant differences in annoyance ratings between urbanisation levels. In this article, a re-analysis of existing survey data is presented, assessing noise annoyance and sleep disturbance from road traffic and railway noise in a random sample stratified by rural, suburban, and inner-city areas. Noise exposure was estimated using modelled Lden and Lnight levels. Exposure-response curves showed greater annoyance at lower road traffic noise levels compared to the WHO guidelines (10% highly annoyed at 35 dB Lden vs. WHO 53 dB Lden). Railway noise annoyance aligned with the WHO estimates; however, sleep disturbance was lower at comparable exposure levels (3% highly sleep-disturbed at 53 dB Lnight vs. WHO 44 dB). This re-analysis provides robust exposure-response relationships. The findings indicate higher levels for road traffic noise annoyance in Germany compared to international standards. A resulting policy implication is to link regular population surveys to noise action planning as a form of public participation. This approach enables the development of measures tailored to local conditions and supports the estimation of potential impacts, such as the number of people who may benefit from reduced noise exposure.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

德国道路交通和铁路噪音造成的噪音烦恼和睡眠障碍。
环境噪声暴露是无处不在的,但噪声源的类型及其评价可能在不同的背景下有所不同。例如,研究发现,不同城市化水平的人在烦恼程度上存在显著差异。本文对现有的调查数据进行了重新分析,以农村、郊区和内城地区为分层随机样本,评估了道路交通和铁路噪音带来的噪音烦恼和睡眠障碍。噪音暴露是用模拟的Lden和Lnight水平来估计的。与世卫组织指南相比,暴露-反应曲线显示,在较低的道路交通噪音水平下,人们更感到烦恼(10%的人在35分贝噪音水平下非常烦恼,而世卫组织为53分贝噪音水平)。铁路噪音扰扰与世界卫生组织的估计相符;然而,在可比较的暴露水平下,睡眠障碍较低(3%高度睡眠障碍,每晚53分贝,而世卫组织为44分贝)。这种重新分析提供了可靠的暴露-反应关系。研究结果表明,与国际标准相比,德国的道路交通噪音水平更高。由此产生的政策含义是将定期人口调查与噪音行动规划联系起来,作为公众参与的一种形式。这种方法可以根据当地的情况制定措施,并支持对潜在影响的估计,例如可能从减少噪音暴露中受益的人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信