{"title":"Are There Morphophysiological Airway Alterations in Syndromic Craniosynostosis? A 3D Computed Tomography and CFD Analysis.","authors":"Michele Garcia-Usó, Amelia Fischer Drake, Luiz André Pimenta, Marcela Cristina Garnica-Siqueira, Thiago Henrique Dos Santos Antunes Albertassi, Cristiano Tonello, Sérgio Henrique Kiemle Trindade, Ivy KiemleTrindade-Suedam","doi":"10.1177/10556656241302550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesCharacterize the upper airways (UAW) in individuals with syndromic craniosynostosis (SCS) using computed tomography scans and correlate with the airflow dynamics and craniofacial pattern.DesignObservational, cross-sectional study.SettingTertiary craniofacial center.IndividualsTwenty-nine individuals were included, divided in 2 groups: CON (n = 19; 21.2 ± 3.7 y), individuals with no craniofacial anomalies and no UAW morphological alterations, and SCS (n = 10; 22.1 ± 5.1 y) individuals with SCS prior to maxillomandibular surgery.InterventionsVolume (V, cm<sup>3</sup>) and minimal cross-sectional area (mCSA, mm<sup>2</sup>) was calculated (Mimics, Belgium). Computational fluid dynamics (ANSYS, EUA) was performed and flow (F, L/min), pressure (P, Pa), and resistance (R, Pa/[L/min]) were calculated. Cephalometric analysis (SNA[<sup>o</sup>]), ANB[<sup>o</sup>], Ba-S-N[<sup>o</sup>]) was also assessed (Dolphin Imaging, USA).Main OutcomeThe morphophysiology of the UAW in SCS individuals was severely impaired compared with the CON group.ResultsThe SCS group exhibited significant volumetric reduction in the total UAW (-29%), nasal cavity (-21%), and pharynx (-37%) compared with the CON group. The mCSA was 57% smaller in the SCS group. CFD simulations demonstrated decreased flow (-9%), increased pressure (136%), and resistance (156%) in the SCS group. UAW resistance presented a strong positive correlation with mCSA (CON: <i>r</i> = 0.77 / SCS: <i>r</i> = 0.88). Cephalometric findings revealed significant differences between CON and SCS, with the SCS group exhibiting values outside the normal range.ConclusionThe UAW of individuals with SCS was anatomically and functionally impaired, suggesting a significant risk for obstructive sleep apnea.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656241302550"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241302550","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectivesCharacterize the upper airways (UAW) in individuals with syndromic craniosynostosis (SCS) using computed tomography scans and correlate with the airflow dynamics and craniofacial pattern.DesignObservational, cross-sectional study.SettingTertiary craniofacial center.IndividualsTwenty-nine individuals were included, divided in 2 groups: CON (n = 19; 21.2 ± 3.7 y), individuals with no craniofacial anomalies and no UAW morphological alterations, and SCS (n = 10; 22.1 ± 5.1 y) individuals with SCS prior to maxillomandibular surgery.InterventionsVolume (V, cm3) and minimal cross-sectional area (mCSA, mm2) was calculated (Mimics, Belgium). Computational fluid dynamics (ANSYS, EUA) was performed and flow (F, L/min), pressure (P, Pa), and resistance (R, Pa/[L/min]) were calculated. Cephalometric analysis (SNA[o]), ANB[o], Ba-S-N[o]) was also assessed (Dolphin Imaging, USA).Main OutcomeThe morphophysiology of the UAW in SCS individuals was severely impaired compared with the CON group.ResultsThe SCS group exhibited significant volumetric reduction in the total UAW (-29%), nasal cavity (-21%), and pharynx (-37%) compared with the CON group. The mCSA was 57% smaller in the SCS group. CFD simulations demonstrated decreased flow (-9%), increased pressure (136%), and resistance (156%) in the SCS group. UAW resistance presented a strong positive correlation with mCSA (CON: r = 0.77 / SCS: r = 0.88). Cephalometric findings revealed significant differences between CON and SCS, with the SCS group exhibiting values outside the normal range.ConclusionThe UAW of individuals with SCS was anatomically and functionally impaired, suggesting a significant risk for obstructive sleep apnea.
期刊介绍:
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.