Effect of Prehabilitation on the 6-Minute Walk Test and Length of Hospital Stay in Frail Older People: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
María López-González, Celia Álvarez-Bueno, Beatriz Rodríguez-Martín, Patricia Lorenzo-García, Marta Carolina Ruiz-Grao, Susana Priego-Jiménez
{"title":"Effect of Prehabilitation on the 6-Minute Walk Test and Length of Hospital Stay in Frail Older People: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"María López-González, Celia Álvarez-Bueno, Beatriz Rodríguez-Martín, Patricia Lorenzo-García, Marta Carolina Ruiz-Grao, Susana Priego-Jiménez","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22091381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frailty reduces resilience to surgical stress, increasing vulnerability to adverse outcomes. While recovery efforts traditionally focus on the postoperative phase, the preoperative period offers better opportunities for lifestyle interventions. Prehabilitation aims to increase functional reserve and surgical tolerance, especially in frail older adults. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation on aerobic capacity-measured by the 6 min walk test (6MWT)-and the length of hospital stay (LOS). A literature search was conducted up to August 2025. Eligible RCTs reported the effects of prehabilitation on functional capacity and LOS. A pairwise meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled mean differences (p-MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of bias was assessed via the Cochrane RoB tool, and evidence quality was assessed via the GRADE system. Five studies involving 400 participants were included. The p-MD for the 6MWT showed no significant improvement at any time point: (T1-T2) 9.71 (CI: -38.92; 58.36), (T2-T3) -3.27 (CI: -71.21; 64.65), and (T1-T3) 15.01 (CI: -22.05; 52.07). The LOS was also not significantly reduced (p-MD: -0.464, CI: -0.960; 0.031). Prehabilitation did not significantly improve aerobic capacity or reduce hospital stay. Future research should explore long-term benefits and adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Frailty reduces resilience to surgical stress, increasing vulnerability to adverse outcomes. While recovery efforts traditionally focus on the postoperative phase, the preoperative period offers better opportunities for lifestyle interventions. Prehabilitation aims to increase functional reserve and surgical tolerance, especially in frail older adults. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation on aerobic capacity-measured by the 6 min walk test (6MWT)-and the length of hospital stay (LOS). A literature search was conducted up to August 2025. Eligible RCTs reported the effects of prehabilitation on functional capacity and LOS. A pairwise meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled mean differences (p-MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of bias was assessed via the Cochrane RoB tool, and evidence quality was assessed via the GRADE system. Five studies involving 400 participants were included. The p-MD for the 6MWT showed no significant improvement at any time point: (T1-T2) 9.71 (CI: -38.92; 58.36), (T2-T3) -3.27 (CI: -71.21; 64.65), and (T1-T3) 15.01 (CI: -22.05; 52.07). The LOS was also not significantly reduced (p-MD: -0.464, CI: -0.960; 0.031). Prehabilitation did not significantly improve aerobic capacity or reduce hospital stay. Future research should explore long-term benefits and adherence.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health.
The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.