Can Global Bioethics Benefit From Islamic Jurisprudential Principles?

IF 2.1 2区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Bioethics Pub Date : 2025-09-27 DOI:10.1111/bioe.70035
Sayyed Mohamed Muhsin, Abdurezak Abdulahi Hashi, Nageeb Gounjaria, Mohammed H Alashaikh, Alexis Heng Boon Chin
{"title":"Can Global Bioethics Benefit From Islamic Jurisprudential Principles?","authors":"Sayyed Mohamed Muhsin, Abdurezak Abdulahi Hashi, Nageeb Gounjaria, Mohammed H Alashaikh, Alexis Heng Boon Chin","doi":"10.1111/bioe.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contemporary bioethical debates in the West are often polarized between secular liberal and conservative Christian perspectives, leaving limited space for cultural viewpoints rooted in non-Western traditions such as those of Hinduism, Confucianism, Islam and various African value systems. Secular liberalism's emphasis on individual autonomy often clashes with the communitarian and family-centred ethics prevalent in many Asian and African societies (i.e., the Global South). Meanwhile, certain conservative Christian positions, such as blanket opposition to embryo-based stem cell research or abortion even in cases of rape, are increasingly being challenged, including within Western contexts, for their perceived inflexibility and impracticality. Historical trends suggest that rigid ideological frameworks may lose relevance over time, underscoring the need for a more inclusive and pragmatic model of global bioethics. This article examines the potential contribution of fiqh, the science of interpreting Islamic revealed texts, and Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah (the higher objectives of Islamic law) to the discourse of global bioethics. It explores the intersection of Universalism and Realism in Islamic thought and discusses how Sharī'ah conceptualizes human life and the strategies for its protection, particularly through the principle of the Preservation of Life (ḥifẓ al-nafs) as a central objective. Furthermore, it analyses the role of maṣlaḥah (public interest), the function of Islamic legal maxims as a roadmap to achieving ethical goals, and the centrality of family and community in Islamic ethics. These themes are considered in contrast to the individualistic values predominant in Western bioethical frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":55379,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary bioethical debates in the West are often polarized between secular liberal and conservative Christian perspectives, leaving limited space for cultural viewpoints rooted in non-Western traditions such as those of Hinduism, Confucianism, Islam and various African value systems. Secular liberalism's emphasis on individual autonomy often clashes with the communitarian and family-centred ethics prevalent in many Asian and African societies (i.e., the Global South). Meanwhile, certain conservative Christian positions, such as blanket opposition to embryo-based stem cell research or abortion even in cases of rape, are increasingly being challenged, including within Western contexts, for their perceived inflexibility and impracticality. Historical trends suggest that rigid ideological frameworks may lose relevance over time, underscoring the need for a more inclusive and pragmatic model of global bioethics. This article examines the potential contribution of fiqh, the science of interpreting Islamic revealed texts, and Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah (the higher objectives of Islamic law) to the discourse of global bioethics. It explores the intersection of Universalism and Realism in Islamic thought and discusses how Sharī'ah conceptualizes human life and the strategies for its protection, particularly through the principle of the Preservation of Life (ḥifẓ al-nafs) as a central objective. Furthermore, it analyses the role of maṣlaḥah (public interest), the function of Islamic legal maxims as a roadmap to achieving ethical goals, and the centrality of family and community in Islamic ethics. These themes are considered in contrast to the individualistic values predominant in Western bioethical frameworks.

全球生命伦理能否受益于伊斯兰法学原则?
当代西方的生命伦理辩论往往在世俗的自由主义和保守的基督教观点之间两极分化,给植根于非西方传统的文化观点留下了有限的空间,比如印度教、儒教、伊斯兰教和各种非洲价值体系。世俗自由主义对个人自治的强调往往与许多亚洲和非洲社会(即全球南方)普遍存在的社区主义和以家庭为中心的伦理冲突。与此同时,某些保守的基督教立场,如全面反对基于胚胎的干细胞研究或甚至在强奸的情况下堕胎,正日益受到挑战,包括在西方背景下,因为他们被认为是不灵活和不切实际的。历史趋势表明,僵化的意识形态框架可能会随着时间的推移而失去相关性,这强调了建立一个更具包容性和实用性的全球生物伦理学模型的必要性。本文考察了fiqh(解释伊斯兰启示文本的科学)和Maqāṣid al- shari 'ah(伊斯兰法律的更高目标)对全球生物伦理学话语的潜在贡献。它探讨了伊斯兰思想中普遍主义和现实主义的交集,并讨论了shari 'ah如何将人类生命概念化以及保护人类生命的策略,特别是通过将生命保存原则(ḥifẓ al-nafs)作为中心目标。此外,它还分析了maṣlaḥah(公共利益)的作用,伊斯兰法律准则作为实现伦理目标的路线图的功能,以及家庭和社区在伊斯兰伦理中的中心地位。这些主题被认为与西方生物伦理框架中占主导地位的个人主义价值观形成对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioethics
Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As medical technology continues to develop, the subject of bioethics has an ever increasing practical relevance for all those working in philosophy, medicine, law, sociology, public policy, education and related fields. Bioethics provides a forum for well-argued articles on the ethical questions raised by current issues such as: international collaborative clinical research in developing countries; public health; infectious disease; AIDS; managed care; genomics and stem cell research. These questions are considered in relation to concrete ethical, legal and policy problems, or in terms of the fundamental concepts, principles and theories used in discussions of such problems. Bioethics also features regular Background Briefings on important current debates in the field. These feature articles provide excellent material for bioethics scholars, teachers and students alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信