Investigating the relationship between complementary and alternative therapy attitudes and pain management self-efficacy in surgical nurses: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Sevcan Avcı Işık, Serpil Kaynarca
{"title":"Investigating the relationship between complementary and alternative therapy attitudes and pain management self-efficacy in surgical nurses: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Sevcan Avcı Işık, Serpil Kaynarca","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03858-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective pain management is central to surgical nursing, yet nurses often face challenges in practice. Self-efficacy influences nurses' ability to manage pain, whereas attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) may also shape clinical decision-making. However, little is known about how CAM attitudes are related to surgical nurses' pain management self-efficacy. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between complementary and alternative therapy attitudes and pain management self-efficacy among surgical nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted with 153 surgical nurses working at a foundation university hospital in a metropolitan city in Turkey. Data were collected using a descriptive questionnaire, the Pain Management Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and the Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire. Associations were analyzed with multiple linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher holistic health attitudes significantly and negatively predicted comprehensive (B = - 0.497, p = 0.001), evaluative (B = - 0.104, p = 0.009), supplemental (B = - 0.072, p = 0.035), and total self-efficacy scores (B = - 0.674, p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that surgical nurses' favorable holistic health attitudes were associated with lower pain management self-efficacy. Recognizing this gap highlights the need to integrate evidence-based CAM content into undergraduate and continuing education and to develop institutional protocols that support holistic approaches. Such strategies may enhance nurses' competence and confidence, ultimately improving patient-centered pain care. Future longitudinal and interventional studies are needed to confirm whether embedding CAM education strengthens self-efficacy in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"1181"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03858-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective pain management is central to surgical nursing, yet nurses often face challenges in practice. Self-efficacy influences nurses' ability to manage pain, whereas attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) may also shape clinical decision-making. However, little is known about how CAM attitudes are related to surgical nurses' pain management self-efficacy. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between complementary and alternative therapy attitudes and pain management self-efficacy among surgical nurses.

Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted with 153 surgical nurses working at a foundation university hospital in a metropolitan city in Turkey. Data were collected using a descriptive questionnaire, the Pain Management Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and the Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire. Associations were analyzed with multiple linear regression.

Results: Higher holistic health attitudes significantly and negatively predicted comprehensive (B = - 0.497, p = 0.001), evaluative (B = - 0.104, p = 0.009), supplemental (B = - 0.072, p = 0.035), and total self-efficacy scores (B = - 0.674, p = 0.001).

Conclusion: This study revealed that surgical nurses' favorable holistic health attitudes were associated with lower pain management self-efficacy. Recognizing this gap highlights the need to integrate evidence-based CAM content into undergraduate and continuing education and to develop institutional protocols that support holistic approaches. Such strategies may enhance nurses' competence and confidence, ultimately improving patient-centered pain care. Future longitudinal and interventional studies are needed to confirm whether embedding CAM education strengthens self-efficacy in clinical practice.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

调查补充和替代治疗态度与外科护士疼痛管理自我效能之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
背景:有效的疼痛管理是外科护理的核心,但护士在实践中经常面临挑战。自我效能感影响护士管理疼痛的能力,而对补充和替代医学(CAM)的态度也可能影响临床决策。然而,CAM态度与外科护士疼痛管理自我效能的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨外科护士对补充和替代治疗态度与疼痛管理自我效能的关系。方法:对土耳其某大城市基础大学医院153名外科护士进行横断面分析研究。采用描述性问卷、疼痛管理自我效能问卷和整体补充和替代医学问卷收集数据。用多元线性回归分析相关性。结果:整体健康态度对综合(B = - 0.497, p = 0.001)、评价(B = - 0.104, p = 0.009)、补充(B = - 0.072, p = 0.035)、总自我效能(B = - 0.674, p = 0.001)得分有显著负向预测作用。结论:外科护士良好的整体健康态度与较低的疼痛管理自我效能感相关。认识到这一差距,就需要将基于证据的CAM内容纳入本科和继续教育,并制定支持整体方法的机构协议。这些策略可以提高护士的能力和信心,最终改善以病人为中心的疼痛护理。嵌入CAM教育是否能增强临床实践中的自我效能感,还需要进一步的纵向和介入研究来证实。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信