Enhancing the Prediction of Inborn Errors of Immunity: Integrating Jeffrey Modell Foundation Criteria with Clinical Variables Using Machine Learning.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Alaaddin Yorulmaz, Ali Şahin, Gamze Sonmez, Fadime Ceyda Eldeniz, Yahya Gül, Mehmet Ali Karaselek, Şükrü Nail Güler, Sevgi Keleş, İsmail Reisli
{"title":"Enhancing the Prediction of Inborn Errors of Immunity: Integrating Jeffrey Modell Foundation Criteria with Clinical Variables Using Machine Learning.","authors":"Alaaddin Yorulmaz, Ali Şahin, Gamze Sonmez, Fadime Ceyda Eldeniz, Yahya Gül, Mehmet Ali Karaselek, Şükrü Nail Güler, Sevgi Keleş, İsmail Reisli","doi":"10.3390/children12091259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) are a heterogeneous group of rare disorders caused by genetic defects in one or more components of the immune system. The Jeffrey Modell Foundation's (JMF) Ten Warning Signs are widely used for early detection; however, their diagnostic sensitivity is limited. Machine learning (ML) approaches may improve prediction accuracy by integrating additional clinical variables into decision-making frameworks. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included 298 participants (98 IEI, 200 non-IEI) evaluated at a university-affiliated clinical immunology clinic between January and December 2020. IEI diagnoses were confirmed using European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) criteria. Two datasets were constructed: one containing only JMF criteria and another combining JMF criteria with additional clinical variables. Four ML algorithms-random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), support vector machine (SVM), and naive Bayes (NB)-were trained and optimized using nested 5-fold stratified cross-validation repeated three times. Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, Youden Index, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to evaluate feature importance. <b>Results</b>: Using only JMF criteria, the best-performing model was SVM (accuracy: 0.90 ± 0.04, sensitivity: 0.93 ± 0.05, AUROC: 0.91 ± 0.02). With the addition of clinical variables, the SVM achieved superior performance (accuracy: 0.94 ± 0.03, sensitivity: 0.97 ± 0.03, AUROC: 0.99 ± 0.00), outperforming both the classical JMF criteria (accuracy: 0.91, sensitivity: 0.87, AUROC: 0.90) and the JMF-only SVM model. SHAP analysis identified family history of early death, pneumonia history, and ICU admission as the most influential predictors. <b>Conclusions</b>: ML models, particularly SVM integrating JMF criteria with additional clinical variables, substantially improve IEI prediction compared with classical JMF criteria. Implementation of such models in clinical settings may facilitate earlier diagnosis and timely intervention, potentially reducing morbidity and healthcare burden in IEI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) are a heterogeneous group of rare disorders caused by genetic defects in one or more components of the immune system. The Jeffrey Modell Foundation's (JMF) Ten Warning Signs are widely used for early detection; however, their diagnostic sensitivity is limited. Machine learning (ML) approaches may improve prediction accuracy by integrating additional clinical variables into decision-making frameworks. Methods: This retrospective study included 298 participants (98 IEI, 200 non-IEI) evaluated at a university-affiliated clinical immunology clinic between January and December 2020. IEI diagnoses were confirmed using European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) criteria. Two datasets were constructed: one containing only JMF criteria and another combining JMF criteria with additional clinical variables. Four ML algorithms-random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), support vector machine (SVM), and naive Bayes (NB)-were trained and optimized using nested 5-fold stratified cross-validation repeated three times. Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, Youden Index, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to evaluate feature importance. Results: Using only JMF criteria, the best-performing model was SVM (accuracy: 0.90 ± 0.04, sensitivity: 0.93 ± 0.05, AUROC: 0.91 ± 0.02). With the addition of clinical variables, the SVM achieved superior performance (accuracy: 0.94 ± 0.03, sensitivity: 0.97 ± 0.03, AUROC: 0.99 ± 0.00), outperforming both the classical JMF criteria (accuracy: 0.91, sensitivity: 0.87, AUROC: 0.90) and the JMF-only SVM model. SHAP analysis identified family history of early death, pneumonia history, and ICU admission as the most influential predictors. Conclusions: ML models, particularly SVM integrating JMF criteria with additional clinical variables, substantially improve IEI prediction compared with classical JMF criteria. Implementation of such models in clinical settings may facilitate earlier diagnosis and timely intervention, potentially reducing morbidity and healthcare burden in IEI patients.

增强对先天免疫错误的预测:利用机器学习整合杰弗里·莫德尔基金会标准与临床变量。
背景:先天性免疫错误(IEIs)是由免疫系统的一个或多个组成部分的遗传缺陷引起的一组异质性罕见疾病。杰弗里·莫德尔基金会(JMF)的十大预警信号被广泛用于早期检测;然而,它们的诊断敏感性是有限的。机器学习(ML)方法可以通过将额外的临床变量集成到决策框架中来提高预测的准确性。方法:本回顾性研究包括298名参与者(98名IEI, 200名非IEI),于2020年1月至12月在一所大学附属临床免疫学诊所进行评估。IEI诊断采用欧洲免疫缺陷学会(ESID)标准。构建了两个数据集:一个仅包含JMF标准,另一个将JMF标准与其他临床变量相结合。随机森林(RF)、k近邻(k-NN)、支持向量机(SVM)和朴素贝叶斯(NB)四种机器学习算法通过重复三次的嵌套5倍分层交叉验证进行训练和优化。性能指标包括准确性、敏感性、特异性、F1评分、约登指数和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)评价特征重要性。结果:仅使用JMF标准时,SVM模型表现最佳(准确率:0.90±0.04,灵敏度:0.93±0.05,AUROC: 0.91±0.02)。加入临床变量后,支持向量机获得了更优的表现(准确率:0.94±0.03,灵敏度:0.97±0.03,AUROC: 0.99±0.00),优于经典JMF标准(准确率:0.91,灵敏度:0.87,AUROC: 0.90)和仅JMF的支持向量机模型。SHAP分析发现,早期死亡家族史、肺炎史和ICU入院是最具影响的预测因素。结论:与经典的JMF标准相比,ML模型,特别是整合JMF标准和附加临床变量的SVM,大大提高了IEI预测。在临床环境中实施这些模型可能有助于早期诊断和及时干预,潜在地降低IEI患者的发病率和医疗负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信