Psychometric evaluation of the Online Education Student Satisfaction Scale: a translation and validation study among Chinese nursing students.

IF 3.9 2区医学 Q1 NURSING

BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-09-26 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-03864-6

Chuang Li, Youbei Lin, Hong Ye Guo, Haixia Zhao, Jinyan Xiong, Xu Yang Xiao, Lan Zhang

{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the Online Education Student Satisfaction Scale: a translation and validation study among Chinese nursing students.","authors":"Chuang Li, Youbei Lin, Hong Ye Guo, Haixia Zhao, Jinyan Xiong, Xu Yang Xiao, Lan Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03864-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To translate the Online Education Student Satisfaction Scale and evaluate its reliability and validity among Chinese nursing students.Background: As online education continues to expand rapidly, understanding student satisfaction is essential for improving educational quality. However, there is a notable lack of assessment tools specifically designed to evaluate the satisfaction of nursing students in online learning environments in China.Design: A cross-sectional study design.Method: The Chinese version of OESSS adopted Brislin's translation model and conducted expert consultations to validate the face validity and testing of the translation version. Reliability and validity were tested using exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency reliability.Results: The Chinese version of the 28-item scale demonstrated good psychometric properties. Exploratory factor analysis identified five factors, accounting for 66.623% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed excellent fit indices: CMIN/DF = 1.185, RMSEA = 0.025, NFI = 0.917, IFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.984, and CFI = 0.986. Reliability measures were also robust, with a total Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.918, McDonald's Omega of 0.910, and test-retest reliability of 0.916.Conclusion: The Chinese version of Online Education Student Satisfaction Scale (C-OESSS) exhibits strong psychometric properties and is well-suited for measuring online education satisfaction among nursing students in China.Clinical trial number: Not applicable.","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"1193"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03864-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To translate the Online Education Student Satisfaction Scale and evaluate its reliability and validity among Chinese nursing students.

Background: As online education continues to expand rapidly, understanding student satisfaction is essential for improving educational quality. However, there is a notable lack of assessment tools specifically designed to evaluate the satisfaction of nursing students in online learning environments in China.

Design: A cross-sectional study design.

Method: The Chinese version of OESSS adopted Brislin's translation model and conducted expert consultations to validate the face validity and testing of the translation version. Reliability and validity were tested using exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency reliability.

Results: The Chinese version of the 28-item scale demonstrated good psychometric properties. Exploratory factor analysis identified five factors, accounting for 66.623% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed excellent fit indices: CMIN/DF = 1.185, RMSEA = 0.025, NFI = 0.917, IFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.984, and CFI = 0.986. Reliability measures were also robust, with a total Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.918, McDonald's Omega of 0.910, and test-retest reliability of 0.916.

Conclusion: The Chinese version of Online Education Student Satisfaction Scale (C-OESSS) exhibits strong psychometric properties and is well-suited for measuring online education satisfaction among nursing students in China.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

在线教育学生满意度量表的心理测量评估：中国护理专业学生的翻译与验证研究。

目的：翻译在线教育学生满意度量表，并对其在中国护生中的信效度进行评价。背景：随着在线教育的快速发展，了解学生满意度对于提高教育质量至关重要。然而，中国明显缺乏专门设计的评估工具来评估护理学生在在线学习环境中的满意度。设计：横断面研究设计。方法：OESSS中文版采用Brislin的翻译模型，并进行专家咨询，对译文进行面效度验证和测试。采用探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析和内部一致性信度检验信度和效度。结果：中文版28项量表具有良好的心理测量特性。探索性因子分析确定了5个因素，占总方差的66.623%。验证性因子分析显示，CMIN/DF = 1.185, RMSEA = 0.025, NFI = 0.917, IFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.984, CFI = 0.986。信度测量也很稳健，Cronbach's α系数为0.918,McDonald's Omega为0.910，重测信度为0.916。结论：中文版在线教育学生满意度量表（C-OESSS）具有较强的心理测量特性，适合于中国护理学生在线教育满意度的测量。临床试验号：不适用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

6.20%

发文量

317

审稿时长

30 weeks

期刊介绍： BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.