Samantha Syme, Kelsey Schweiberger, Judy C Chang, Ann Kavanaugh-McHugh, Abdesalam Soudi, Justin T Clapp, Nadine A Kasparian, Robert M Arnold, Kelly W Harris
{"title":"Discussion of the Fetus in Fetal Cardiology Consultations: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Samantha Syme, Kelsey Schweiberger, Judy C Chang, Ann Kavanaugh-McHugh, Abdesalam Soudi, Justin T Clapp, Nadine A Kasparian, Robert M Arnold, Kelly W Harris","doi":"10.3390/children12091211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> While prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease is increasingly common, and communication is essential to minimizing familial stress, little is known about how the fetus is discussed in this setting. This study observed how clinicians and families refer to the fetus during initial fetal cardiology consultations. <b>Methods:</b> Initial fetal cardiology consultations from one institution were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A codebook was developed and used to code the transcripts. Codes included any reference to the fetus and any attribution of agency or mental states to the fetus. <b>Results:</b> Nineteen consultations performed by five clinicians from one academic institution were included. Clinicians and families most frequently referred to the fetus using personal terminology (e.g., third-person pronouns, a given name, or \"son\" or \"daughter\"). Impersonal terminology (e.g., \"baby\") was used less frequently, followed by medical terminology (e.g., \"fetus\"), which was only used in two consultations. In about half of the consultations, clinicians conferred agency or mental states on the fetus by attributing actions, emotions, or knowledge to the fetus. <b>Conclusions:</b> Fetal cardiology clinicians primarily use personal terminology when referring to the fetus during initial consultations. Familial preferences need to be evaluated to optimize communication and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: While prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease is increasingly common, and communication is essential to minimizing familial stress, little is known about how the fetus is discussed in this setting. This study observed how clinicians and families refer to the fetus during initial fetal cardiology consultations. Methods: Initial fetal cardiology consultations from one institution were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A codebook was developed and used to code the transcripts. Codes included any reference to the fetus and any attribution of agency or mental states to the fetus. Results: Nineteen consultations performed by five clinicians from one academic institution were included. Clinicians and families most frequently referred to the fetus using personal terminology (e.g., third-person pronouns, a given name, or "son" or "daughter"). Impersonal terminology (e.g., "baby") was used less frequently, followed by medical terminology (e.g., "fetus"), which was only used in two consultations. In about half of the consultations, clinicians conferred agency or mental states on the fetus by attributing actions, emotions, or knowledge to the fetus. Conclusions: Fetal cardiology clinicians primarily use personal terminology when referring to the fetus during initial consultations. Familial preferences need to be evaluated to optimize communication and support.
期刊介绍:
Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries.
The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.