Discussion of the Fetus in Fetal Cardiology Consultations: A Qualitative Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Samantha Syme, Kelsey Schweiberger, Judy C Chang, Ann Kavanaugh-McHugh, Abdesalam Soudi, Justin T Clapp, Nadine A Kasparian, Robert M Arnold, Kelly W Harris
{"title":"Discussion of the Fetus in Fetal Cardiology Consultations: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Samantha Syme, Kelsey Schweiberger, Judy C Chang, Ann Kavanaugh-McHugh, Abdesalam Soudi, Justin T Clapp, Nadine A Kasparian, Robert M Arnold, Kelly W Harris","doi":"10.3390/children12091211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> While prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease is increasingly common, and communication is essential to minimizing familial stress, little is known about how the fetus is discussed in this setting. This study observed how clinicians and families refer to the fetus during initial fetal cardiology consultations. <b>Methods:</b> Initial fetal cardiology consultations from one institution were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A codebook was developed and used to code the transcripts. Codes included any reference to the fetus and any attribution of agency or mental states to the fetus. <b>Results:</b> Nineteen consultations performed by five clinicians from one academic institution were included. Clinicians and families most frequently referred to the fetus using personal terminology (e.g., third-person pronouns, a given name, or \"son\" or \"daughter\"). Impersonal terminology (e.g., \"baby\") was used less frequently, followed by medical terminology (e.g., \"fetus\"), which was only used in two consultations. In about half of the consultations, clinicians conferred agency or mental states on the fetus by attributing actions, emotions, or knowledge to the fetus. <b>Conclusions:</b> Fetal cardiology clinicians primarily use personal terminology when referring to the fetus during initial consultations. Familial preferences need to be evaluated to optimize communication and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease is increasingly common, and communication is essential to minimizing familial stress, little is known about how the fetus is discussed in this setting. This study observed how clinicians and families refer to the fetus during initial fetal cardiology consultations. Methods: Initial fetal cardiology consultations from one institution were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A codebook was developed and used to code the transcripts. Codes included any reference to the fetus and any attribution of agency or mental states to the fetus. Results: Nineteen consultations performed by five clinicians from one academic institution were included. Clinicians and families most frequently referred to the fetus using personal terminology (e.g., third-person pronouns, a given name, or "son" or "daughter"). Impersonal terminology (e.g., "baby") was used less frequently, followed by medical terminology (e.g., "fetus"), which was only used in two consultations. In about half of the consultations, clinicians conferred agency or mental states on the fetus by attributing actions, emotions, or knowledge to the fetus. Conclusions: Fetal cardiology clinicians primarily use personal terminology when referring to the fetus during initial consultations. Familial preferences need to be evaluated to optimize communication and support.

胎儿心脏科会诊中胎儿的讨论:一项定性研究。
背景:虽然先天性心脏病的产前诊断越来越普遍,沟通对于减少家庭压力至关重要,但在这种情况下如何讨论胎儿却知之甚少。本研究观察临床医生和家庭如何提及胎儿在最初的胎心学咨询。方法:记录并逐字抄写来自一家机构的胎儿心脏病初诊。一个密码本被开发出来,并被用来给抄本编码。代码包括对胎儿的任何提及以及对胎儿的代理或精神状态的任何归因。结果:包括来自一个学术机构的5名临床医生进行的19次咨询。临床医生和家庭最常使用个人术语(例如,第三人称代词,名,或“儿子”或“女儿”)提及胎儿。非个人术语(如“婴儿”)的使用频率较低,其次是医学术语(如“胎儿”),仅在两次咨询中使用。在大约一半的咨询中,临床医生通过将行为、情感或知识归因于胎儿,将代理或精神状态赋予胎儿。结论:胎儿心脏病学临床医生主要使用个人术语时,提到胎儿在初步咨询。需要评估家庭偏好以优化沟通和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信