Oxygen Saturation, Heart Rate, and Anxiety Levels Among Claustrophobic and Non-Claustrophobic Patients Undergoing Closed and Open MRI: A Comparative Study.

Q2 Medicine
Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pub Date : 2025-09-29 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1097/RMR.0000000000000319
Shamsaldin Saleem Hasan, Shereen Ismail Hajee
{"title":"Oxygen Saturation, Heart Rate, and Anxiety Levels Among Claustrophobic and Non-Claustrophobic Patients Undergoing Closed and Open MRI: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Shamsaldin Saleem Hasan, Shereen Ismail Hajee","doi":"10.1097/RMR.0000000000000319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosis but often induces anxiety, especially in claustrophobic patients, potentially affecting image quality. This study compared oxygen saturation, heart rate, and anxiety levels between claustrophobic and non-claustrophobic patients undergoing closed and open MRI in Erbil, Iraq.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The comparative study was conducted from October 2024 to April 2025 in the Radiology Departments of Consultant Medical City and Top Med Medical Complex Centers in Erbil using purposive sampling. The questionnaire contained 3 sections: sociodemographic variables, the Claustrophobia Questionnaire, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Subscale. Physiological measures (oxygen saturation and heart rate) were recorded at 3 timepoints: pre-, mid-, and post-MRI. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA, repeated measures ANOVA, post hoc tests, and both univariate and multiple linear regression, using SPSS version 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 125 participants were involved in the study. The mean anxiety score was moderate, with higher levels in claustrophobic patients. Claustrophobia scores also fell within the moderate range, indicating psychological discomfort during the MRI procedure. Physiological measurements showed that claustrophobic patients, particularly those undergoing closed MRI, experienced elevated heart rates and reduced oxygen saturation compared to non-claustrophobic individuals. Statistical analysis indicated a strong positive association between anxiety and claustrophobia, with scan entry direction, age, and sex also being significant predictors of claustrophobic responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Claustrophobic patients undergoing closed MRI experience increased anxiety and physiological distress. Open MRI systems and pre-scan anxiety screening are recommended to enhance patient comfort and diagnostic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39381,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosis but often induces anxiety, especially in claustrophobic patients, potentially affecting image quality. This study compared oxygen saturation, heart rate, and anxiety levels between claustrophobic and non-claustrophobic patients undergoing closed and open MRI in Erbil, Iraq.

Material and methods: The comparative study was conducted from October 2024 to April 2025 in the Radiology Departments of Consultant Medical City and Top Med Medical Complex Centers in Erbil using purposive sampling. The questionnaire contained 3 sections: sociodemographic variables, the Claustrophobia Questionnaire, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Subscale. Physiological measures (oxygen saturation and heart rate) were recorded at 3 timepoints: pre-, mid-, and post-MRI. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA, repeated measures ANOVA, post hoc tests, and both univariate and multiple linear regression, using SPSS version 26.

Results: A total of 125 participants were involved in the study. The mean anxiety score was moderate, with higher levels in claustrophobic patients. Claustrophobia scores also fell within the moderate range, indicating psychological discomfort during the MRI procedure. Physiological measurements showed that claustrophobic patients, particularly those undergoing closed MRI, experienced elevated heart rates and reduced oxygen saturation compared to non-claustrophobic individuals. Statistical analysis indicated a strong positive association between anxiety and claustrophobia, with scan entry direction, age, and sex also being significant predictors of claustrophobic responses.

Conclusions: Claustrophobic patients undergoing closed MRI experience increased anxiety and physiological distress. Open MRI systems and pre-scan anxiety screening are recommended to enhance patient comfort and diagnostic outcomes.

封闭和开放MRI检查幽闭恐惧症和非幽闭恐惧症患者的氧饱和度、心率和焦虑水平:一项比较研究。
背景和目的:磁共振成像(MRI)对诊断至关重要,但常常引起焦虑,特别是在幽闭恐惧症患者中,可能影响图像质量。这项研究比较了在伊拉克埃尔比勒接受封闭和开放MRI检查的幽闭恐惧症患者和非幽闭恐惧症患者的血氧饱和度、心率和焦虑水平。材料与方法:采用目的抽样的方法,于2024年10月至2025年4月在埃尔比勒咨询医学城和顶级医学综合中心放射科进行对比研究。问卷包括社会人口学变量、幽闭恐惧症问卷、状态-特质焦虑量表-状态子量表三个部分。生理指标(血氧饱和度和心率)分别记录于mri前、中、后3个时间点。统计分析包括单因素方差分析、重复测量方差分析、事后检验以及单因素和多元线性回归,使用SPSS版本26。结果:本研究共纳入125名受试者。平均焦虑得分为中等,幽闭恐惧症患者的焦虑得分较高。幽闭恐惧症得分也在中等范围内,表明在核磁共振成像过程中心理不适。生理测量显示,与非幽闭恐惧症患者相比,幽闭恐惧症患者,特别是那些接受闭式MRI的患者,心率升高,血氧饱和度降低。统计分析表明,焦虑和幽闭恐惧症之间存在强烈的正相关,扫描进入方向、年龄和性别也是幽闭恐惧症反应的重要预测因素。结论:幽闭恐惧症患者接受封闭MRI时,焦虑和生理困扰增加。开放式MRI系统和扫描前焦虑筛查建议提高患者舒适度和诊断结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a leading information resource for professionals in the MRI community. This publication supplies authoritative, up-to-the-minute coverage of technical advances in this evolving field as well as practical, hands-on guidance from leading experts. Six times a year, TMRI focuses on a single timely topic of interest to radiologists. These topical issues present a variety of perspectives from top radiological authorities to provide an in-depth understanding of how MRI is being used in each area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信