Heta Räisänen, Antti Ronkainen, Juhana Frösen, Tuomo Thesleff
{"title":"Surgery of atlantoaxial osteoarthritis.","authors":"Heta Räisänen, Antti Ronkainen, Juhana Frösen, Tuomo Thesleff","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unilateral atlantoaxial osteoarthritis (AAOA) is an underdiagnosed condition characterised by severe occipitocervical pain and restricted head rotation. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and complications associated with different surgical methods used to treat AAOA in cases where conservative management fails.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at Tampere University Hospital, Finland, with patients treated between 2004 and 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at a median follow-up of 60 days postoperatively, with a focus on pain reduction and complication rates. The study included 49 patients diagnosed with unilateral AAOA who underwent either C1-2 fixation with or without C2 nerve root decompression (group 1) or only C2 nerve root decompression (group 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed substantial pain reduction with good or excellent outcomes in 82.3 % in group 1 and 73.3 % in group 2. Complications were more common in group 1 (29.4 %) than in group 2 (13.3 %), with sensory loss in the C2 dermatome being the most frequent complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that both C1-2 fixation and C2 nerve root decompression are safe and effective methods for pain caused by AAOA, the later especially when symptoms are related to C2 radiculopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"124507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Unilateral atlantoaxial osteoarthritis (AAOA) is an underdiagnosed condition characterised by severe occipitocervical pain and restricted head rotation. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and complications associated with different surgical methods used to treat AAOA in cases where conservative management fails.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at Tampere University Hospital, Finland, with patients treated between 2004 and 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at a median follow-up of 60 days postoperatively, with a focus on pain reduction and complication rates. The study included 49 patients diagnosed with unilateral AAOA who underwent either C1-2 fixation with or without C2 nerve root decompression (group 1) or only C2 nerve root decompression (group 2).
Results: Both groups showed substantial pain reduction with good or excellent outcomes in 82.3 % in group 1 and 73.3 % in group 2. Complications were more common in group 1 (29.4 %) than in group 2 (13.3 %), with sensory loss in the C2 dermatome being the most frequent complication.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that both C1-2 fixation and C2 nerve root decompression are safe and effective methods for pain caused by AAOA, the later especially when symptoms are related to C2 radiculopathy.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS