Optimizing Vagus Nerve Stimulation Parameters in Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Retrospective Two-Center Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Müge Baykan, Özge Baykan Çopuroğlu, Elif Didinmez Taşkırdı, Pınar Gençpınar, Nihal Olgaç Dündar
{"title":"Optimizing Vagus Nerve Stimulation Parameters in Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Retrospective Two-Center Study.","authors":"Müge Baykan, Özge Baykan Çopuroğlu, Elif Didinmez Taşkırdı, Pınar Gençpınar, Nihal Olgaç Dündar","doi":"10.3390/children12091222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) remains a major challenge in pediatric neurology, as many children fail to achieve seizure control despite appropriate medications. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) offers an effective adjunctive treatment; however, optimal stimulation parameters for children are not well defined and are often extrapolated from adult protocols. This retrospective two-center cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of VNS in pediatric DRE and to determine stimulation thresholds-particularly output current and duty cycle-most strongly associated with seizure reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-two pediatric patients (aged 0-18 years) with DRE who underwent VNS implantation and were followed for at least 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. Stimulation frequency and pulse width were fixed at 30 Hz and 250 µs, while output current and duty cycle were titrated based on clinical response. Seizure outcomes were derived from caregiver-maintained seizure diaries and confirmed during structured follow-up visits. Treatment response was defined as a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months post-implantation, 76.9% of patients achieved ≥ 50% seizure reduction, 32.7% experienced ≥ 90% reduction, and 11.5% attained complete seizure freedom. Optimal outcomes were associated with output currents of approximately 1.5 mA and duty cycles of 10%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VNS is a highly effective and well-tolerated treatment for pediatric DRE. Stabilization at an output current of 1.5 mA and a 10% duty cycle may serve as a clinically useful programming target. These findings support the use of individualized, age-specific stimulation strategies to optimize outcomes in pediatric VNS therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) remains a major challenge in pediatric neurology, as many children fail to achieve seizure control despite appropriate medications. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) offers an effective adjunctive treatment; however, optimal stimulation parameters for children are not well defined and are often extrapolated from adult protocols. This retrospective two-center cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of VNS in pediatric DRE and to determine stimulation thresholds-particularly output current and duty cycle-most strongly associated with seizure reduction.

Methods: Fifty-two pediatric patients (aged 0-18 years) with DRE who underwent VNS implantation and were followed for at least 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. Stimulation frequency and pulse width were fixed at 30 Hz and 250 µs, while output current and duty cycle were titrated based on clinical response. Seizure outcomes were derived from caregiver-maintained seizure diaries and confirmed during structured follow-up visits. Treatment response was defined as a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency compared to baseline.

Results: At 12 months post-implantation, 76.9% of patients achieved ≥ 50% seizure reduction, 32.7% experienced ≥ 90% reduction, and 11.5% attained complete seizure freedom. Optimal outcomes were associated with output currents of approximately 1.5 mA and duty cycles of 10%.

Conclusions: VNS is a highly effective and well-tolerated treatment for pediatric DRE. Stabilization at an output current of 1.5 mA and a 10% duty cycle may serve as a clinically useful programming target. These findings support the use of individualized, age-specific stimulation strategies to optimize outcomes in pediatric VNS therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

优化迷走神经刺激参数治疗儿童耐药癫痫:一项回顾性双中心研究。
目的:耐药癫痫(DRE)仍然是儿科神经病学的主要挑战,因为许多儿童无法实现癫痫控制,尽管适当的药物。迷走神经刺激(VNS)提供了有效的辅助治疗;然而,儿童的最佳刺激参数并没有很好地定义,通常是从成人方案中推断出来的。这项回顾性双中心队列研究旨在评估VNS在儿童DRE中的临床效果,并确定刺激阈值——特别是输出电流和占空比——与癫痫发作减少最密切相关。方法:回顾性分析52例0 ~ 18岁的DRE患儿行VNS植入术,随访至少12个月。刺激频率和脉宽固定在30 Hz和250µs,同时根据临床反应滴定输出电流和占空比。癫痫发作结果来源于护理人员维护的癫痫发作日记,并在有组织的随访中得到证实。治疗反应定义为癫痫发作频率较基线降低≥50%。结果:植入后12个月,76.9%的患者癫痫发作减少≥50%,32.7%的患者癫痫发作减少≥90%,11.5%的患者癫痫发作完全自由。最佳结果与输出电流约1.5 mA和占空比为10%相关。结论:VNS是一种有效且耐受性良好的儿童DRE治疗方法。稳定输出电流为1.5 mA,占空比为10%,可作为临床有用的编程目标。这些发现支持使用个性化、年龄特异性刺激策略来优化儿童VNS治疗的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信