Immunogenicity and Safety of a Live Attenuated Varicella Vaccine in Healthy Children Aged 12 to 15 Months: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Clinical Trial.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Vaccines Pub Date : 2025-09-13 DOI:10.3390/vaccines13090973
Nancy Nazaire-Bermal, Ningning Jia, Maria Angela C Maronilla, Josemaria F Lopez, Gang Zeng, Wenbin Wu, Adrielle Bernice C Nimo, Chunfang Luan, Qianqian Xin
{"title":"Immunogenicity and Safety of a Live Attenuated Varicella Vaccine in Healthy Children Aged 12 to 15 Months: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Nancy Nazaire-Bermal, Ningning Jia, Maria Angela C Maronilla, Josemaria F Lopez, Gang Zeng, Wenbin Wu, Adrielle Bernice C Nimo, Chunfang Luan, Qianqian Xin","doi":"10.3390/vaccines13090973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: The varicella vaccine (VarV) produced by Sinovac (Dalian) obtained World Health Organization (WHO) prequalification in November 2022. However, no direct comparative studies have been conducted between VarV and other WHO-prequalified varicella vaccines. The study aimed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of Sinovac's VarV compared with Merck Sharp & Dohme's (MSD) VARIVAX<sup>®</sup> (Moorgate, London, UK) following a single dose administration. <b>Methods</b>: This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial was conducted in the Philippines. Healthy children aged 12 to 15 months were enrolled. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single dose of varicella vaccine either manufactured by Sinovac (Test group) or MSD (Active control group). Immunogenicity was evaluated 6 weeks after vaccination by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The primary immunogenicity endpoint was seroresponse rate 6 weeks after vaccination. Seroresponse rate was defined as varicella-zoster virus (VZV) antibody concentration ≥ 10 mIU/mL in participants who were seronegative (antibody concentration < 10 mIU/mL) at baseline. The secondary endpoint was the corresponding geometric mean concentration (GMC). Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were monitored for 6 weeks after vaccination. <b>Results</b>: Among the 484 participants analyzed, the seroresponse rates 6 weeks after vaccination were 98.85% and 98.88% in the Test group and Active control group, respectively, with a difference of -0.03% (95% CI: -3.10%, 2.99%), which exceeded the predefined non-inferiority margin of -10%. The corresponding GMCs were 35.73 mIU/mL and 37.34 mIU/mL, respectively, with the ratio of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.06), also exceeding the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.67. Furthermore, the incidence of adverse reactions (ARs) in the Test group was lower than that in the Active control group (38.08% vs. 55.51%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Sinovac's VarV demonstrated non-inferior immunogenicity to WHO-prequalified comparator vaccine (VARIVAX<sup>®</sup>) and favorable safety profile. These findings indicated that VarV (Sinovac, Beijing, China) met WHO standards for varicella vaccine evaluation, supporting its global use consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13090973","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The varicella vaccine (VarV) produced by Sinovac (Dalian) obtained World Health Organization (WHO) prequalification in November 2022. However, no direct comparative studies have been conducted between VarV and other WHO-prequalified varicella vaccines. The study aimed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of Sinovac's VarV compared with Merck Sharp & Dohme's (MSD) VARIVAX® (Moorgate, London, UK) following a single dose administration. Methods: This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial was conducted in the Philippines. Healthy children aged 12 to 15 months were enrolled. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single dose of varicella vaccine either manufactured by Sinovac (Test group) or MSD (Active control group). Immunogenicity was evaluated 6 weeks after vaccination by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The primary immunogenicity endpoint was seroresponse rate 6 weeks after vaccination. Seroresponse rate was defined as varicella-zoster virus (VZV) antibody concentration ≥ 10 mIU/mL in participants who were seronegative (antibody concentration < 10 mIU/mL) at baseline. The secondary endpoint was the corresponding geometric mean concentration (GMC). Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were monitored for 6 weeks after vaccination. Results: Among the 484 participants analyzed, the seroresponse rates 6 weeks after vaccination were 98.85% and 98.88% in the Test group and Active control group, respectively, with a difference of -0.03% (95% CI: -3.10%, 2.99%), which exceeded the predefined non-inferiority margin of -10%. The corresponding GMCs were 35.73 mIU/mL and 37.34 mIU/mL, respectively, with the ratio of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.06), also exceeding the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.67. Furthermore, the incidence of adverse reactions (ARs) in the Test group was lower than that in the Active control group (38.08% vs. 55.51%). Conclusions: Sinovac's VarV demonstrated non-inferior immunogenicity to WHO-prequalified comparator vaccine (VARIVAX®) and favorable safety profile. These findings indicated that VarV (Sinovac, Beijing, China) met WHO standards for varicella vaccine evaluation, supporting its global use consideration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

12 - 15个月健康儿童水痘减毒活疫苗的免疫原性和安全性:一项随机、双盲、主动对照的III期临床试验
目的:2022年11月,大连科兴公司生产的水痘疫苗(VarV)获得世界卫生组织(WHO)资格预审。然而,没有在VarV和其他经世卫组织预审合格的水痘疫苗之间进行直接比较研究。该研究旨在评估科兴VarV单次给药后与默沙东(Merck Sharp & Dohme) VARIVAX®(Moorgate, London, UK)的免疫原性和安全性。方法:该III期随机、双盲、主动对照、非劣效性试验在菲律宾进行。研究对象为12至15个月的健康儿童。符合条件的参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受由科兴(试验组)或默沙东(积极对照组)生产的单剂量水痘疫苗。接种后6周采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)评价免疫原性。主要免疫原性终点是疫苗接种后6周的血清应答率。血清反应率定义为基线时血清阴性(抗体浓度< 10 mIU/mL)的参与者的水痘-带状疱疹病毒(VZV)抗体浓度≥10 mIU/mL。次要终点为相应的几何平均浓度(GMC)。接种疫苗后6周监测不良事件(ae)和严重不良事件(sae)。结果:在分析的484名参与者中,接种疫苗6周后,试验组和积极对照组的血清应答率分别为98.85%和98.88%,差异为-0.03% (95% CI: -3.10%, 2.99%),超过了预先设定的-10%的非劣效边际。相应的gmc分别为35.73 mIU/mL和37.34 mIU/mL,比值为0.96 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.06),也超过了预定的非劣效边际0.67。而且,试验组不良反应(ARs)发生率低于活性对照组(38.08% vs. 55.51%)。结论:科兴VarV的免疫原性优于世卫组织预审比较疫苗(VARIVAX®),且具有良好的安全性。这些发现表明VarV(中国北京科兴)符合世卫组织水痘疫苗评价标准,支持其全球使用考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccines
Vaccines Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1853
审稿时长
18.06 days
期刊介绍: Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focused on laboratory and clinical vaccine research, utilization and immunization. Vaccines publishes high quality reviews, regular research papers, communications and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信