Baseline Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and Protection from Symptomatic Infection: Post Hoc Analysis of the SCTV01E Phase 3 Randomized Trial.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Vaccines Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI:10.3390/vaccines13090984
Lixin Yan, Jiang Yi, Dongfang Liu, Jian Li, Adam Abdul Hakeem Baidoo, Liangzhi Xie
{"title":"Baseline Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and Protection from Symptomatic Infection: Post Hoc Analysis of the SCTV01E Phase 3 Randomized Trial.","authors":"Lixin Yan, Jiang Yi, Dongfang Liu, Jian Li, Adam Abdul Hakeem Baidoo, Liangzhi Xie","doi":"10.3390/vaccines13090984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, the necessity of vaccination after natural infection remains uncertain. However, many asymptomatic individuals who test negative virologically may nevertheless receive vaccination without being aware of their prior infection. Investigating the implications for vaccine safety and efficacy is crucial. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed the daily fluctuations in anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels during the enrollment period of a phase 3 randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of a tetravalent COVID-19 protein vaccine, SCTV01E. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between baseline IgG levels and their protection against COVID-19 in participants who received placebo. <b>Results:</b> The daily enrolled participants with different baseline IgG levels (<338 BAU/mL, 338-1000 BAU/mL, >1000 BAU/mL) showed dynamic changes with the enrollment date. Among participants with baseline IgG levels < 338 BAU/mL, vaccination conferred a relative protective efficacy of 69.15% (95% CI: 51.14-80.52%) against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with the control group. Conversely, in those with higher baseline IgG levels (≥338 BAU/mL), vaccination did not confer additional benefit. In the placebo group, the relative protection in participants with baseline IgG levels ≥ 338 BAU/mL was 93.79% (87.60%, 96.89%) compared to that of those with baseline IgG levels < 338 BAU/mL. The safety profile of SCTV01E in participants with baseline IgG ≥ 338 BAU/mL was comparable to that in participants with <338 BAU/mL, with favorable safety profiles. <b>Conclusions:</b> During the SCTV01E phase 3 clinical trial, an anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody IgG level of 338 BAU/mL was suitable for screening individuals in the early phase post-infection alongside virological tests. Vaccinating the infected population was safe and did not compromise efficacy. Clinical Trial: NCT05308576.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13090984","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, the necessity of vaccination after natural infection remains uncertain. However, many asymptomatic individuals who test negative virologically may nevertheless receive vaccination without being aware of their prior infection. Investigating the implications for vaccine safety and efficacy is crucial. Methods: We analyzed the daily fluctuations in anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels during the enrollment period of a phase 3 randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of a tetravalent COVID-19 protein vaccine, SCTV01E. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between baseline IgG levels and their protection against COVID-19 in participants who received placebo. Results: The daily enrolled participants with different baseline IgG levels (<338 BAU/mL, 338-1000 BAU/mL, >1000 BAU/mL) showed dynamic changes with the enrollment date. Among participants with baseline IgG levels < 338 BAU/mL, vaccination conferred a relative protective efficacy of 69.15% (95% CI: 51.14-80.52%) against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with the control group. Conversely, in those with higher baseline IgG levels (≥338 BAU/mL), vaccination did not confer additional benefit. In the placebo group, the relative protection in participants with baseline IgG levels ≥ 338 BAU/mL was 93.79% (87.60%, 96.89%) compared to that of those with baseline IgG levels < 338 BAU/mL. The safety profile of SCTV01E in participants with baseline IgG ≥ 338 BAU/mL was comparable to that in participants with <338 BAU/mL, with favorable safety profiles. Conclusions: During the SCTV01E phase 3 clinical trial, an anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody IgG level of 338 BAU/mL was suitable for screening individuals in the early phase post-infection alongside virological tests. Vaccinating the infected population was safe and did not compromise efficacy. Clinical Trial: NCT05308576.

基线抗sars - cov -2 IgG和对症状感染的保护:SCTV01E 3期随机试验的事后分析
背景:SARS-CoV-2感染后,自然感染后接种疫苗的必要性尚不确定。然而,许多病毒学检测阴性的无症状个体可能在不知道其先前感染的情况下接受疫苗接种。调查对疫苗安全性和有效性的影响至关重要。方法:在一项四价COVID-19蛋白疫苗SCTV01E的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的3期临床试验入组期间,我们分析了抗sars - cov -2 IgG抗体水平的每日波动。此外,我们调查了基线IgG水平与接受安慰剂的参与者对COVID-19的保护之间的关系。结果:不同基线IgG水平(1000 BAU/mL)的每日入组受试者随入组日期呈现动态变化。在基线IgG水平< 338 BAU/mL的参与者中,与对照组相比,接种疫苗对症状性SARS-CoV-2感染的相对保护效力为69.15% (95% CI: 51.14-80.52%)。相反,在基线IgG水平较高(≥338 BAU/mL)的患者中,接种疫苗并没有带来额外的益处。在安慰剂组中,基线IgG水平≥338 BAU/mL的受试者相对于基线IgG水平< 338 BAU/mL的受试者的相对保护作用为93.79%(87.60%,96.89%)。SCTV01E在基线IgG≥338 BAU/mL的受试者中的安全性与基线IgG≥338 BAU/mL的受试者的安全性相当。结论:在SCTV01E的3期临床试验中,抗sars - cov -2 IgG抗体IgG水平为338 BAU/mL,与病毒学测试一起适用于筛查感染后早期个体。为受感染人群接种疫苗是安全的,而且不会影响疫苗的效力。临床试验:NCT05308576。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccines
Vaccines Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1853
审稿时长
18.06 days
期刊介绍: Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focused on laboratory and clinical vaccine research, utilization and immunization. Vaccines publishes high quality reviews, regular research papers, communications and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信