Hepatitis E Vaccination Preferences and Willingness-to-Pay Among Residents: A Discrete Choice Experiment Analysis.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Vaccines Pub Date : 2025-08-27 DOI:10.3390/vaccines13090906
Yuanqiong Chen, Chao Zhang, Zhuoru Zou, Weijun Hu, Dan Zhang, Sidi Zhao, Shaobai Zhang, Qian Wu, Lei Zhang
{"title":"Hepatitis E Vaccination Preferences and Willingness-to-Pay Among Residents: A Discrete Choice Experiment Analysis.","authors":"Yuanqiong Chen, Chao Zhang, Zhuoru Zou, Weijun Hu, Dan Zhang, Sidi Zhao, Shaobai Zhang, Qian Wu, Lei Zhang","doi":"10.3390/vaccines13090906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is associated with severe hepatitis and high mortality rates, yet vaccination coverage remains suboptimal. Investigating public preferences for HEV vaccination is critical for developing targeted prevention strategies. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to quantify attribute preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for HEV vaccination among Chinese residents (in Shaanxi Province, for example), aiming to inform evidence-based immunization policy optimization. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional survey recruited 3300 participants using stratified random sampling. The vaccine attributes-protective efficacy, duration of protection, and out-of-pocket cost-were identified using a systematic literature review and expert consultation. A comparative analysis of preference characteristics was conducted using conditional logit (Model 1) and mixed logit (Model 2) regression models. Population heterogeneity in vaccination preferences was further analyzed using the conditional logit framework, with marginal WTP estimated using parameter coefficients. <b>Results</b>: Among 3199 valid responses, duration of protection (Model 2: 10-years; <i>β</i> = 0.456, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and out-of-pocket cost (Model 2: 2000-3000 CNY; <i>β</i> = -0.179, <i>p</i> < 0.001) significantly influenced vaccination decisions. Preference heterogeneity was observed: women of childbearing age prioritized longer protection (10 years; <i>β</i> = 0.677, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and were sensitive to the cost of 1000-2000 CNY (<i>β</i> = 0.169, <i>p</i> = 0.011), while urban residents valued extended protection more than rural counterparts. <b>Conclusions</b>: Protection duration emerged as the primary determinant of HEV vaccination preference. Policy recommendations include implementing tiered pricing strategies and targeted health education campaigns emphasizing long-term protection benefits to enhance vaccine uptake and affordability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13090906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is associated with severe hepatitis and high mortality rates, yet vaccination coverage remains suboptimal. Investigating public preferences for HEV vaccination is critical for developing targeted prevention strategies. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to quantify attribute preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for HEV vaccination among Chinese residents (in Shaanxi Province, for example), aiming to inform evidence-based immunization policy optimization. Methods: A cross-sectional survey recruited 3300 participants using stratified random sampling. The vaccine attributes-protective efficacy, duration of protection, and out-of-pocket cost-were identified using a systematic literature review and expert consultation. A comparative analysis of preference characteristics was conducted using conditional logit (Model 1) and mixed logit (Model 2) regression models. Population heterogeneity in vaccination preferences was further analyzed using the conditional logit framework, with marginal WTP estimated using parameter coefficients. Results: Among 3199 valid responses, duration of protection (Model 2: 10-years; β = 0.456, p < 0.001) and out-of-pocket cost (Model 2: 2000-3000 CNY; β = -0.179, p < 0.001) significantly influenced vaccination decisions. Preference heterogeneity was observed: women of childbearing age prioritized longer protection (10 years; β = 0.677, p < 0.001) and were sensitive to the cost of 1000-2000 CNY (β = 0.169, p = 0.011), while urban residents valued extended protection more than rural counterparts. Conclusions: Protection duration emerged as the primary determinant of HEV vaccination preference. Policy recommendations include implementing tiered pricing strategies and targeted health education campaigns emphasizing long-term protection benefits to enhance vaccine uptake and affordability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

居民戊型肝炎疫苗接种偏好与支付意愿:一个离散选择实验分析。
目的:戊型肝炎病毒(HEV)感染与严重肝炎和高死亡率相关,但疫苗接种覆盖率仍不理想。调查公众对戊型肝炎疫苗接种的偏好对于制定有针对性的预防战略至关重要。本研究采用离散选择实验(DCE)来量化中国居民(以陕西省为例)对戊型肝炎疫苗的属性偏好和支付意愿(WTP),旨在为循证免疫政策优化提供信息。方法:采用分层随机抽样的横断面调查方法,招募3300名参与者。通过系统的文献回顾和专家咨询,确定了疫苗的属性——保护效果、保护持续时间和自付费用。采用条件logit(模型1)和混合logit(模型2)回归模型对偏好特征进行对比分析。使用条件logit框架进一步分析疫苗接种偏好的人群异质性,并使用参数系数估计边际WTP。结果:在3199个有效应答中,保护期(模型2:10年,β = 0.456, p < 0.001)和自付费用(模型2:2000-3000元,β = -0.179, p < 0.001)显著影响疫苗接种决策。结果表明:育龄妇女优先考虑延长保护年限(10年,β = 0.677, p < 0.001),对1000-2000元的费用敏感(β = 0.169, p = 0.011),而城市居民比农村居民更重视延长保护年限。结论:保护时间是HEV疫苗接种偏好的主要决定因素。政策建议包括实施分层定价战略和有针对性的健康教育运动,强调长期保护效益,以提高疫苗的吸收率和可负担性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccines
Vaccines Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1853
审稿时长
18.06 days
期刊介绍: Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focused on laboratory and clinical vaccine research, utilization and immunization. Vaccines publishes high quality reviews, regular research papers, communications and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信