A scoping review protocol for the application of intersectionality in primary care research.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sean Urwin, Harriet Bullen, Saad Abbas, Pulkit Singh, Stephanie Gillibrand, Georgia Chatzi, Philip Britteon
{"title":"A scoping review protocol for the application of intersectionality in primary care research.","authors":"Sean Urwin, Harriet Bullen, Saad Abbas, Pulkit Singh, Stephanie Gillibrand, Georgia Chatzi, Philip Britteon","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02922-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Past attempts to reduce inequalities in primary care have been met with mixed success. For initiatives to reduce inequalities, it is essential that they identify the most vulnerable groups in society to prevent any future exacerbation of inequalities. Intersectionality theory provides a framework to identify these groups via the exploration of how structural forms of social marginalisation interact to generate unique forms of inequalities. Despite this, little is known about the application of intersectionality theory in primary care research. To address this limitation, we propose a scoping review to comprehensively identify applications of intersectionality in the primary care inequalities literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scoping review will be guided by Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology framework. The review will search for studies using data to investigate intersectionalities in primary care context, using: (i) multiple electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, ECONLIT, PsycArticles, Social Policy and Practice, and Scopus); (ii) OpenGrey to search the grey literature; and (iii) a forward and backward citation search. All authors will independently screen studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The proposed review will be the first to identify studies that have utilised intersectionality theory and methodologies in a primary care context. The findings will inform the design and evaluation of future primary care inequality interventions.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/h9p83/.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02922-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Past attempts to reduce inequalities in primary care have been met with mixed success. For initiatives to reduce inequalities, it is essential that they identify the most vulnerable groups in society to prevent any future exacerbation of inequalities. Intersectionality theory provides a framework to identify these groups via the exploration of how structural forms of social marginalisation interact to generate unique forms of inequalities. Despite this, little is known about the application of intersectionality theory in primary care research. To address this limitation, we propose a scoping review to comprehensively identify applications of intersectionality in the primary care inequalities literature.

Methods: The scoping review will be guided by Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology framework. The review will search for studies using data to investigate intersectionalities in primary care context, using: (i) multiple electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, ECONLIT, PsycArticles, Social Policy and Practice, and Scopus); (ii) OpenGrey to search the grey literature; and (iii) a forward and backward citation search. All authors will independently screen studies.

Discussion: The proposed review will be the first to identify studies that have utilised intersectionality theory and methodologies in a primary care context. The findings will inform the design and evaluation of future primary care inequality interventions.

Trail registration: Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/h9p83/.

Abstract Image

交叉性在初级保健研究中应用的范围审查方案。
导言:过去减少初级保健不平等现象的尝试取得了成败参半的成功。对于减少不平等的举措,至关重要的是要确定社会中最脆弱的群体,以防止未来不平等的加剧。交叉性理论通过探索社会边缘化的结构形式如何相互作用以产生独特形式的不平等,为识别这些群体提供了一个框架。尽管如此,人们对交叉性理论在初级保健研究中的应用知之甚少。为了解决这一限制,我们提出了一项范围审查,以全面确定交叉性在初级保健不平等文献中的应用。方法:范围审查将以Arksey和O'Malley的范围审查方法框架为指导。本综述将搜索使用数据调查初级保健背景下交叉性的研究,使用:(i)多个电子数据库(包括MEDLINE、EMBASE、ECONLIT、PsycArticles、社会政策与实践和Scopus);(ii) OpenGrey搜索灰色文献;(3)前后引文检索。所有作者将独立筛选研究。讨论:拟议的综述将首次确定在初级保健背景下利用交叉性理论和方法的研究。研究结果将为未来初级保健不平等干预措施的设计和评估提供信息。试验注册:系统评审注册:开放科学框架https://osf.io/h9p83/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信