Nourishing lung health: a meta-analysis and systematic review protocol of nutrition interventions for lung cancer patients.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Trishnee Bhurosy, Clara Lefevre, Zaymee Syeda
{"title":"Nourishing lung health: a meta-analysis and systematic review protocol of nutrition interventions for lung cancer patients.","authors":"Trishnee Bhurosy, Clara Lefevre, Zaymee Syeda","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02840-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving the nutrition of patients with lung cancer is a major public health concern. Malnutrition and other nutritional issues affect up to 80% of cancer patients with lung cancer and negatively impact their quality of life. Yet, there is no adequate information regarding what types of interventions are most effective for improving nutrition and survivorship outcomes in patients with lung cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis will determine the effectiveness of interventions in improving nutritional status, quality of life, and survival among patients with lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will search the following databases and websites (from inception untill March 2025): CINAHL, MedlinePlus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. We will search for gray literature on the following websites: the American Lung Association, Lung Cancer Foundation of America, Lung Cancer Research Foundation, American Cancer Society, and the National Cancer Institute. We will include studies that used an experimental or rigorous quasi-experimental design. Two reviewers will independently screen all articles and categorize data using a data abstraction tool. The two reviewers will resolve disagreements through discussion. The risk of bias in included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2. All statistical analyses will be conducted on STATA.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate both published and unpublished literature to determine the types of nutritional interventions that are associated with improved quality of life and survival among patients with lung cancer. In addition, it will identify strategies that can be incorporated into nutritional care protocols for patients with lung cancer to reduce their risk of malnutrition and treatment effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>The protocol has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: 592,679).</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02840-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improving the nutrition of patients with lung cancer is a major public health concern. Malnutrition and other nutritional issues affect up to 80% of cancer patients with lung cancer and negatively impact their quality of life. Yet, there is no adequate information regarding what types of interventions are most effective for improving nutrition and survivorship outcomes in patients with lung cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis will determine the effectiveness of interventions in improving nutritional status, quality of life, and survival among patients with lung cancer.

Methods: We will search the following databases and websites (from inception untill March 2025): CINAHL, MedlinePlus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. We will search for gray literature on the following websites: the American Lung Association, Lung Cancer Foundation of America, Lung Cancer Research Foundation, American Cancer Society, and the National Cancer Institute. We will include studies that used an experimental or rigorous quasi-experimental design. Two reviewers will independently screen all articles and categorize data using a data abstraction tool. The two reviewers will resolve disagreements through discussion. The risk of bias in included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2. All statistical analyses will be conducted on STATA.

Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate both published and unpublished literature to determine the types of nutritional interventions that are associated with improved quality of life and survival among patients with lung cancer. In addition, it will identify strategies that can be incorporated into nutritional care protocols for patients with lung cancer to reduce their risk of malnutrition and treatment effectiveness.

Systematic review registration: The protocol has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: 592,679).

滋养肺健康:肺癌患者营养干预的荟萃分析和系统评价方案。
背景:改善肺癌患者的营养是一个重要的公共卫生问题。营养不良和其他营养问题影响着多达80%的肺癌癌症患者,并对他们的生活质量产生负面影响。然而,关于哪种干预措施对改善肺癌患者的营养和生存结果最有效,目前还没有足够的信息。本系统综述和荟萃分析将确定干预措施在改善肺癌患者营养状况、生活质量和生存方面的有效性。方法:我们将检索以下数据库和网站(从成立到2025年3月):CINAHL, MedlinePlus, PubMed, ScienceDirect和Web of Science。我们将在以下网站上搜索灰色文献:美国肺脏协会、美国肺癌基金会、肺癌研究基金会、美国癌症协会和国家癌症研究所。我们将包括使用实验或严格的准实验设计的研究。两名审稿人将独立筛选所有文章,并使用数据抽象工具对数据进行分类。两位审稿人将通过讨论解决分歧。纳入研究的偏倚风险将使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具2进行评估。所有统计分析将在STATA上进行。讨论:本系统综述和荟萃分析将评估已发表和未发表的文献,以确定与改善肺癌患者生活质量和生存率相关的营养干预类型。此外,它将确定可纳入肺癌患者营养护理方案的战略,以降低其营养不良风险和治疗效果。系统评价注册:该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(ID: 592,679)上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信