Latency Period Among Asbestosis Cases in South Korea by Demographic and Asbestos Exposure Characteristics.

IF 4.1 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Toxics Pub Date : 2025-09-13 DOI:10.3390/toxics13090775
Won Young So, Min-Sung Kang, Young Hwangbo, Mee-Ri Lee
{"title":"Latency Period Among Asbestosis Cases in South Korea by Demographic and Asbestos Exposure Characteristics.","authors":"Won Young So, Min-Sung Kang, Young Hwangbo, Mee-Ri Lee","doi":"10.3390/toxics13090775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although asbestos use has been banned in many countries, including South Korea, the long latency period of asbestos-related diseases remains a serious public health concern. We conducted a nationwide, registry-based retrospective study to estimate the latency period of asbestosis and identify its determinants. We analyzed exposure history and demographics for 1110 asbestosis cases collected by the Ministry of Environment and the Environmental Health Center for Asbestos in Korea between 2009 and 2021. Mean latency was 45.3 years for asbestosis Grade 1 and 46.3 years for Grade 2. Patients with occupational exposure had shorter latency than those with environmental exposure: 44.4 vs. 46.0 years in Grade 1 (<i>p</i> = 0.010) and 45.0 vs. 47.0 years in Grade 2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Within occupations, production-type work showed the shortest latency; within environmental exposure, residence near asbestos-related industries showed the shortest latency, whereas residence near asbestos mines showed the longest. Longer exposure duration (occupational) was associated with shorter latency, and greater residential distance from the source (environmental) with longer latency. Priorities for further investigation include differences by asbestos fiber type and exposure intensity/modality, to inform strengthened occupational health monitoring and targeted surveillance for residents near industrial sources and legacy mines.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13090775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although asbestos use has been banned in many countries, including South Korea, the long latency period of asbestos-related diseases remains a serious public health concern. We conducted a nationwide, registry-based retrospective study to estimate the latency period of asbestosis and identify its determinants. We analyzed exposure history and demographics for 1110 asbestosis cases collected by the Ministry of Environment and the Environmental Health Center for Asbestos in Korea between 2009 and 2021. Mean latency was 45.3 years for asbestosis Grade 1 and 46.3 years for Grade 2. Patients with occupational exposure had shorter latency than those with environmental exposure: 44.4 vs. 46.0 years in Grade 1 (p = 0.010) and 45.0 vs. 47.0 years in Grade 2 (p < 0.001). Within occupations, production-type work showed the shortest latency; within environmental exposure, residence near asbestos-related industries showed the shortest latency, whereas residence near asbestos mines showed the longest. Longer exposure duration (occupational) was associated with shorter latency, and greater residential distance from the source (environmental) with longer latency. Priorities for further investigation include differences by asbestos fiber type and exposure intensity/modality, to inform strengthened occupational health monitoring and targeted surveillance for residents near industrial sources and legacy mines.

Abstract Image

根据人口统计学和石棉暴露特征,韩国石棉沉滞病例的潜伏期。
尽管包括韩国在内的许多国家已禁止使用石棉,但石棉相关疾病的潜伏期长仍然是一个严重的公共卫生问题。我们进行了一项全国性的、基于登记的回顾性研究,以估计石棉沉滞的潜伏期并确定其决定因素。我们分析了2009年至2021年间韩国环境部和石棉环境卫生中心收集的1110例石棉沉滞病例的暴露史和人口统计学数据。1级石棉沉滞症的平均潜伏期为45.3年,2级为46.3年。职业暴露患者潜伏期短于环境暴露患者:1级44.4年vs. 46.0年(p = 0.010), 2级45.0年vs. 47.0年(p < 0.001)。在职业中,生产型工作的潜伏期最短;在环境暴露中,居住在石棉相关工业附近的潜伏期最短,而居住在石棉矿山附近的潜伏期最长。较长的暴露时间(职业性)与较短的潜伏期相关,较长的居住距离(环境性)与较长的潜伏期相关。进一步调查的重点包括石棉纤维类型和暴露强度/方式的差异,以便为加强职业健康监测提供信息,并对工业来源和遗留矿山附近的居民进行有针对性的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信