Evaluating a Mindfulness Induction for Coping with Social Exclusion in Emerging Adults who Engage in Non-Suicidal Self-Injury.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Amanda Simundic, Julia Petrovic, Bassam Khoury, Marie-Claude Geoffroy, Nancy Heath
{"title":"Evaluating a Mindfulness Induction for Coping with Social Exclusion in Emerging Adults who Engage in Non-Suicidal Self-Injury.","authors":"Amanda Simundic, Julia Petrovic, Bassam Khoury, Marie-Claude Geoffroy, Nancy Heath","doi":"10.1177/00332941251383508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research suggests that individuals who engage in non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) experience heightened sensitivity to social stressors such as exclusion. Mindfulness practice may buffer social stress among the general population, but whether it functions differently among those who engage in NSSI remains unclear. This experimental study sought to investigate the effects of a mindfulness induction relative to a control task as a buffer against social exclusion among emerging adults with and without a past-year history of NSSI, in terms of state stress and negative and positive affect, over time (baseline, reactivity, recovery). Participants included 172 emerging adults: 82 who reported past-year engagement in NSSI (<i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 22.51, <i>SD</i> = 2.74; 78% women) and 90 who have never engaged in NSSI (<i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 22.57, <i>SD</i> = 2.61; 80% women). All participants completed baseline measures of state stress and affect and were randomly assigned to either a mindfulness induction or active control task. Following completion of these activities, they underwent a social exclusion task (i.e., Cyberball), followed by reactivity measures of state stress and affect. Following a brief delay, participants finally completed recovery measures of state stress and affect. Three 3-way ANCOVAs (Time X Group X Condition) revealed no significant effects of the mindfulness induction on any outcomes at either follow-up time point (<i>p</i>'s > .05), although exploratory supplemental analyses revealed significant decreases in state stress and both positive and negative affect from baseline to reactivity (<i>p</i>'s < .001). Thus, while the mindfulness induction did not differ from a control task in terms of buffering stress and affect in response to social exclusion, participants did report a decrease on outcomes from baseline to post-social exclusion. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941251383508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251383508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research suggests that individuals who engage in non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) experience heightened sensitivity to social stressors such as exclusion. Mindfulness practice may buffer social stress among the general population, but whether it functions differently among those who engage in NSSI remains unclear. This experimental study sought to investigate the effects of a mindfulness induction relative to a control task as a buffer against social exclusion among emerging adults with and without a past-year history of NSSI, in terms of state stress and negative and positive affect, over time (baseline, reactivity, recovery). Participants included 172 emerging adults: 82 who reported past-year engagement in NSSI (Mage = 22.51, SD = 2.74; 78% women) and 90 who have never engaged in NSSI (Mage = 22.57, SD = 2.61; 80% women). All participants completed baseline measures of state stress and affect and were randomly assigned to either a mindfulness induction or active control task. Following completion of these activities, they underwent a social exclusion task (i.e., Cyberball), followed by reactivity measures of state stress and affect. Following a brief delay, participants finally completed recovery measures of state stress and affect. Three 3-way ANCOVAs (Time X Group X Condition) revealed no significant effects of the mindfulness induction on any outcomes at either follow-up time point (p's > .05), although exploratory supplemental analyses revealed significant decreases in state stress and both positive and negative affect from baseline to reactivity (p's < .001). Thus, while the mindfulness induction did not differ from a control task in terms of buffering stress and affect in response to social exclusion, participants did report a decrease on outcomes from baseline to post-social exclusion. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

评估正念诱导对参与非自杀性自伤的新生成人应对社会排斥的影响。
先前的研究表明,从事非自杀性自伤(NSSI)的个体对社会压力源(如排斥)的敏感度更高。正念练习可以缓冲一般人群的社会压力,但它在自伤者中是否有不同的作用尚不清楚。本实验研究旨在从状态压力、消极和积极影响(基线、反应性、恢复)的角度,探讨在有或没有过去一年自伤史的新生成人中,正念诱导相对于控制任务作为社会排斥缓冲的效果。参与者包括172名刚成年的人:82名报告过去一年有自伤行为(Mage = 22.51, SD = 2.74, 78%为女性),90名从未有过自伤行为(Mage = 22.57, SD = 2.61, 80%为女性)。所有参与者都完成了状态压力和情绪的基线测量,并被随机分配到正念诱导或主动控制任务中。在完成这些活动后,他们接受了一个社会排斥任务(即Cyberball),然后是状态压力和影响的反应性测量。在短暂的延迟之后,参与者最终完成了状态压力和情绪的恢复测量。三个3-way ANCOVAs(时间X组X条件)显示,正念诱导对任何随访时间点的任何结果都没有显著影响(p < 0.05),尽管探索性补充分析显示,从基线到反应性,状态压力和积极和消极影响均显着降低(p < 0.001)。因此,虽然正念诱导在缓冲压力和对社会排斥反应的影响方面与对照任务没有区别,但参与者确实报告了从基线到后社会排斥的结果下降。讨论了对未来研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信