Unity or Diversity in Executive Functions: Examining the Three-Factor Model in Young Children.

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
PsyCh journal Pub Date : 2025-09-27 DOI:10.1002/pchj.70055
Aleksander Veraksa, Morteza Charkhabi, Margarita Aslanova, Elena Dvorskaya, Vera Yakupova
{"title":"Unity or Diversity in Executive Functions: Examining the Three-Factor Model in Young Children.","authors":"Aleksander Veraksa, Morteza Charkhabi, Margarita Aslanova, Elena Dvorskaya, Vera Yakupova","doi":"10.1002/pchj.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Executive functions (EFs) as a set of cognitive processes play a crucial role in developing children's higher mental functions and academic success. Regardless of the number of studies conducted on EFs, current findings on the structure of cognitive functions as a whole or multifaceted construct are mixed. This study aims to evaluate and compare the latent factor structure of EFs in preschool-aged children (5-7 years) and school-aged children (7-9 years) to identify this structure across two age groups. The study involved 500 children divided into four age groups: senior kindergarten groups, preparatory kindergarten groups, first grade groups, and second grade groups. The participants were assessed using the NEPSY-II neuropsychological battery and the Dimensional Change Card Sort task. The results revealed that a three-factor model of EFs, comprising inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility, best fits the data across all age groups. This suggests an earlier differentiation of EFs components, starting at the age of 5, which contradicts some previous studies proposing one- or two-factor structures in preschool age. Correlation analysis showed statistically moderate relationships between EFs components, which weakened by the second grade, potentially indicating stabilization in EFs development during early school years. The findings support the unity and diversity model of EFs and emphasize the importance of conducting longitudinal research to clarify the factors influencing EFs development over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":20804,"journal":{"name":"PsyCh journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PsyCh journal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.70055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Executive functions (EFs) as a set of cognitive processes play a crucial role in developing children's higher mental functions and academic success. Regardless of the number of studies conducted on EFs, current findings on the structure of cognitive functions as a whole or multifaceted construct are mixed. This study aims to evaluate and compare the latent factor structure of EFs in preschool-aged children (5-7 years) and school-aged children (7-9 years) to identify this structure across two age groups. The study involved 500 children divided into four age groups: senior kindergarten groups, preparatory kindergarten groups, first grade groups, and second grade groups. The participants were assessed using the NEPSY-II neuropsychological battery and the Dimensional Change Card Sort task. The results revealed that a three-factor model of EFs, comprising inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility, best fits the data across all age groups. This suggests an earlier differentiation of EFs components, starting at the age of 5, which contradicts some previous studies proposing one- or two-factor structures in preschool age. Correlation analysis showed statistically moderate relationships between EFs components, which weakened by the second grade, potentially indicating stabilization in EFs development during early school years. The findings support the unity and diversity model of EFs and emphasize the importance of conducting longitudinal research to clarify the factors influencing EFs development over time.

执行功能的统一性或多样性:对幼儿三因素模型的检验。
执行功能作为一套认知过程,在儿童高级心理功能的发展和学业成功中起着至关重要的作用。不管对电磁场进行了多少研究,目前关于认知功能整体结构或多面结构的研究结果都是混杂的。本研究旨在评估和比较学龄前儿童(5-7岁)和学龄儿童(7-9岁)ef的潜在因素结构,以确定这两个年龄组的潜在因素结构。这项研究涉及500名儿童,他们被分为四个年龄组:幼儿园高年级组、幼儿园预科组、一年级组和二年级组。参与者使用nepsyi - ii神经心理学测试和维度变化卡片分类任务进行评估。结果显示,包括抑制控制、工作记忆和认知灵活性在内的三因素ef模型最适合所有年龄组的数据。这表明,从5岁开始,ef成分就有了更早的分化,这与之前一些研究提出的学龄前儿童的单因素或双因素结构相矛盾。相关分析显示,在小学二年级时,情感体验各组成部分之间的关系有所减弱,这可能表明情感体验的发展在学校早期趋于稳定。该研究结果支持了ef的统一性和多样性模型,并强调了进行纵向研究以阐明随时间推移影响ef发展的因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PsyCh journal
PsyCh journal PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: PsyCh Journal, China''s first international psychology journal, publishes peer‑reviewed research articles, research reports and integrated research reviews spanning the entire spectrum of scientific psychology and its applications. PsyCh Journal is the flagship journal of the Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences – the only national psychology research institute in China – and reflects the high research standards of the nation. Launched in 2012, PsyCh Journal is devoted to the publication of advanced research exploring basic mechanisms of the human mind and behavior, and delivering scientific knowledge to enhance understanding of culture and society. Towards that broader goal, the Journal will provide a forum for academic exchange and a “knowledge bridge” between China and the World by showcasing high-quality, cutting-edge research related to the science and practice of psychology both within and outside of China. PsyCh Journal features original articles of both empirical and theoretical research in scientific psychology and interdisciplinary sciences, across all levels, from molecular, cellular and system, to individual, group and society. The Journal also publishes evaluative and integrative review papers on any significant research contribution in any area of scientific psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信