Kylie M Wagstaff, Mark S Stein, Alan Herschtal, Jean-Jacques Rajter, Juliana Cepelowicz Rajter, Michele Sallaberger, Alexia Smileski, Amala Kanagalingam, David A Jans
{"title":"A Pilot, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of a Single Oral Dose of Ivermectin for Post-Exposure Prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2.","authors":"Kylie M Wagstaff, Mark S Stein, Alan Herschtal, Jean-Jacques Rajter, Juliana Cepelowicz Rajter, Michele Sallaberger, Alexia Smileski, Amala Kanagalingam, David A Jans","doi":"10.3390/pharmaceutics17091205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The efficacy of a single oral dose of Ivermectin as prophylaxis for SARS-CoV-2 is uncertain. This trial sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a single oral low dose of Ivermectin to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection or reduce symptoms if infection did occur. <b>Methods:</b> Asymptomatic community-dwelling adults were enrolled in this study within 72 h of close contact with a case of SARS-CoV-2. Participants were randomised, stratified by vaccination status and exposure site, to a single oral 200 µg/kg dose of Ivermectin or placebo. The primary outcome was conversion to a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or rapid antigen test (RAT) for SARS-CoV-2 within 14 days of close contact. Secondary outcomes were restricted to those who met the primary outcome. They included the following: days alive free of symptoms in the 14 (DAFS1-14) and 28 (DAFS1-28) days following intervention and days from close contact until a positive PCR or RAT for SARS-CoV-2. <b>Results:</b> A total of 536 participants registered for this trial. Of these, 86 met inclusion criteria and were randomised. 68 adhered to the trial protocol and were included in the analysis. A total of 11/36 (Ivermectin arm) and 11/32 (placebo arm) met the primary outcome. After controlling for age and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, the estimate (95% confidence interval (95% CI)) of the effect of Ivermectin (compared to placebo) on the absolute value of the proportion of participants converting to a positive PCR or RAT was -0.051 (-0.26 to 0.16), <i>p</i> = 0.63. After controlling for prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, age, body mass index, hypertension and lung disease, the average treatment effect (Ivermectin versus placebo) on DAFS1-14 was 2.5 days (95%CI 1.1 to 4.5), <i>p</i> = 0.036, and for DAFS1-28, was 2.3 days (95% CI 0.7 to 3.3), <i>p</i> = 0.35. The mean (standard deviation) number of days from close contact until a positive PCR or RAT was 5.0 (4.1) days for the Ivermectin group versus 2.6 (0.8) days for the placebo group. After controlling for age and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, the average treatment effect (95%CI), Ivermectin versus placebo, on days from close contact until a positive PCR or RAT was 2.3 days (95% CI 1.1 to 3.4), <i>p</i> = 0.033. <b>Conclusions:</b> We did not demonstrate that a single oral low dose of Ivermectin administered to asymptomatic adults within 72 h of close contact with a case of SARS-CoV-2 prevents conversion to a positive PCR or RAT. However, the trial had a small sample size and does not exclude a clinically meaningful effect of Ivermectin on conversion to a positive PCR or RAT. Amongst those who did convert to a positive PCR or RAT, the use of Ivermectin significantly lengthened the time from close contact to conversion and increased the number of days alive free of symptoms following intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":19894,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutics","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17091205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The efficacy of a single oral dose of Ivermectin as prophylaxis for SARS-CoV-2 is uncertain. This trial sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a single oral low dose of Ivermectin to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection or reduce symptoms if infection did occur. Methods: Asymptomatic community-dwelling adults were enrolled in this study within 72 h of close contact with a case of SARS-CoV-2. Participants were randomised, stratified by vaccination status and exposure site, to a single oral 200 µg/kg dose of Ivermectin or placebo. The primary outcome was conversion to a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or rapid antigen test (RAT) for SARS-CoV-2 within 14 days of close contact. Secondary outcomes were restricted to those who met the primary outcome. They included the following: days alive free of symptoms in the 14 (DAFS1-14) and 28 (DAFS1-28) days following intervention and days from close contact until a positive PCR or RAT for SARS-CoV-2. Results: A total of 536 participants registered for this trial. Of these, 86 met inclusion criteria and were randomised. 68 adhered to the trial protocol and were included in the analysis. A total of 11/36 (Ivermectin arm) and 11/32 (placebo arm) met the primary outcome. After controlling for age and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, the estimate (95% confidence interval (95% CI)) of the effect of Ivermectin (compared to placebo) on the absolute value of the proportion of participants converting to a positive PCR or RAT was -0.051 (-0.26 to 0.16), p = 0.63. After controlling for prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, age, body mass index, hypertension and lung disease, the average treatment effect (Ivermectin versus placebo) on DAFS1-14 was 2.5 days (95%CI 1.1 to 4.5), p = 0.036, and for DAFS1-28, was 2.3 days (95% CI 0.7 to 3.3), p = 0.35. The mean (standard deviation) number of days from close contact until a positive PCR or RAT was 5.0 (4.1) days for the Ivermectin group versus 2.6 (0.8) days for the placebo group. After controlling for age and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, the average treatment effect (95%CI), Ivermectin versus placebo, on days from close contact until a positive PCR or RAT was 2.3 days (95% CI 1.1 to 3.4), p = 0.033. Conclusions: We did not demonstrate that a single oral low dose of Ivermectin administered to asymptomatic adults within 72 h of close contact with a case of SARS-CoV-2 prevents conversion to a positive PCR or RAT. However, the trial had a small sample size and does not exclude a clinically meaningful effect of Ivermectin on conversion to a positive PCR or RAT. Amongst those who did convert to a positive PCR or RAT, the use of Ivermectin significantly lengthened the time from close contact to conversion and increased the number of days alive free of symptoms following intervention.
PharmaceuticsPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
2379
审稿时长
16.41 days
期刊介绍:
Pharmaceutics (ISSN 1999-4923) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, and short notes. Covered topics include pharmacokinetics, toxicokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, and pharmaceutical formulation. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical details in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.