Epidemiological Significance of the Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the Spread of Vector-Transmitted Zoonoses in the Area of Northern Croatia.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Marina Pavlak, Jelena Prpić, Ioana A Matei, Krešimir Trninić, Snježana Ćurković, Željko Mihaljević, Zrinka Štritof, Ksenija Vlahović, Žarko Udiljak, Lorena Jemeršić
{"title":"Epidemiological Significance of the Fox (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>) in the Spread of Vector-Transmitted Zoonoses in the Area of Northern Croatia.","authors":"Marina Pavlak, Jelena Prpić, Ioana A Matei, Krešimir Trninić, Snježana Ćurković, Željko Mihaljević, Zrinka Štritof, Ksenija Vlahović, Žarko Udiljak, Lorena Jemeršić","doi":"10.3390/pathogens14090858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wild animals often serve as reservoirs for vector-borne zoonoses, which are on the rise worldwide but have not yet been sufficiently researched. Vector-borne zoonoses, such as those caused by <i>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</i>, <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i> sensu lato, and <i>Dirofilaria immitis</i>, are a growing public health concern due to their increasing incidence and broad host range. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for vector-borne bacterial (borreliosis, anaplasmosis, ehrlichiosis) and parasitic (dirofilariasis) pathogens and to detect some of these pathogens in the red fox (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>) population in Croatia. A total of 179 blood samples from foxes from nine districts were analysed. The SNAP <sup>®</sup> 4Dx <sup>®</sup> Plus rapid test was used to detect circulating <i>D. immitis</i> antigen and antibodies against <i>B. burgdorferi</i>, <i>A. phagocytophilum</i>/<i>Anaplasma platys</i>, and <i>Ehrlichia canis</i>/<i>Ehrlichia ewingii</i>. Circulating <i>D. immitis</i> antigen was detected in 6.70% of the samples (95% CI: 3.20-10.19%), while antibodies against <i>A. phagocytophilum</i>/<i>A. platys</i> were found in 10.06% (95% CI: 5.8-14.25%). Only one sample was positive for <i>B. burgdorferi</i>, while no antibodies were detected for <i>E. canis</i>/<i>E. ewingii</i>. Spatial analysis revealed statistically significant differences in prevalence by geographical region (district) and age, while no significant correlations were found. In the standard PCR analysis, DNA of <i>D. immitis</i> was not detected in any of the eight positive and eight negative SNAP <sup>®</sup> 4Dx <sup>®</sup> Plus samples. <i>D. repens</i>, <i>A. reconditum</i>, or co-infections were also not detected by PCR. Of the nine samples that tested positive for <i>A. phagocytophilum</i>/<i>A. platys</i> antibodies, four were confirmed to be positive for <i>A. phagocytophilum</i> by nested and semi-nested PCR targeting the 16S rRNA and GroEL genes. Phylogenetic analysis revealed similarities with various European strains, including zoonotic strains. This study is the first molecular detection of <i>A. phagocytophilum</i> from blood samples of red foxes in Croatia. The results show that red foxes are not free from infections such as anaplasmosis and dirofilariasis, emphasising their possible role in the maintenance and transmission of these pathogens in certain regions of Croatia. These results underline the need for further research to better understand the epidemiological importance of red foxes in the spread of vector-borne diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090858","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wild animals often serve as reservoirs for vector-borne zoonoses, which are on the rise worldwide but have not yet been sufficiently researched. Vector-borne zoonoses, such as those caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and Dirofilaria immitis, are a growing public health concern due to their increasing incidence and broad host range. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for vector-borne bacterial (borreliosis, anaplasmosis, ehrlichiosis) and parasitic (dirofilariasis) pathogens and to detect some of these pathogens in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) population in Croatia. A total of 179 blood samples from foxes from nine districts were analysed. The SNAP ® 4Dx ® Plus rapid test was used to detect circulating D. immitis antigen and antibodies against B. burgdorferi, A. phagocytophilum/Anaplasma platys, and Ehrlichia canis/Ehrlichia ewingii. Circulating D. immitis antigen was detected in 6.70% of the samples (95% CI: 3.20-10.19%), while antibodies against A. phagocytophilum/A. platys were found in 10.06% (95% CI: 5.8-14.25%). Only one sample was positive for B. burgdorferi, while no antibodies were detected for E. canis/E. ewingii. Spatial analysis revealed statistically significant differences in prevalence by geographical region (district) and age, while no significant correlations were found. In the standard PCR analysis, DNA of D. immitis was not detected in any of the eight positive and eight negative SNAP ® 4Dx ® Plus samples. D. repens, A. reconditum, or co-infections were also not detected by PCR. Of the nine samples that tested positive for A. phagocytophilum/A. platys antibodies, four were confirmed to be positive for A. phagocytophilum by nested and semi-nested PCR targeting the 16S rRNA and GroEL genes. Phylogenetic analysis revealed similarities with various European strains, including zoonotic strains. This study is the first molecular detection of A. phagocytophilum from blood samples of red foxes in Croatia. The results show that red foxes are not free from infections such as anaplasmosis and dirofilariasis, emphasising their possible role in the maintenance and transmission of these pathogens in certain regions of Croatia. These results underline the need for further research to better understand the epidemiological importance of red foxes in the spread of vector-borne diseases.

狐(Vulpes Vulpes)在克罗地亚北部地区媒介传播人畜共患病传播中的流行病学意义。
野生动物通常是媒介传播的人畜共患病的宿主,这种疾病在世界范围内呈上升趋势,但尚未得到充分的研究。媒介传播的人畜共患病,如由嗜吞噬细胞无原体、伯氏疏螺旋体和免疫Dirofilaria引起的疾病,由于发病率增加和宿主范围广泛,已成为日益严重的公共卫生问题。本研究的目的是确定媒介传播的细菌(疏螺旋体病、无形体病、埃利希体病)和寄生虫(双丝虫病)病原体的流行情况和危险因素,并在克罗地亚红狐种群中检测其中一些病原体。对来自9个地区的179份狐狸血样进行了分析。采用SNAP®4Dx®Plus快速检测循环免疫D.抗原和抗伯氏疏螺旋体、嗜吞噬细胞A. / platys无形体和犬埃利希体/Ehrlichia ewingii的抗体。6.70%的标本检出循环免疫D.抗原(95% CI: 3.20 ~ 10.19%),检出嗜吞噬细胞A.抗体。platys占10.06% (95% CI: 5.8 ~ 14.25%)。只有一份样本检测到伯氏疏螺旋体阳性,而没有检测到犬大肠杆菌/E抗体。ewingii。空间分析显示,不同地理区域(区)和年龄的患病率差异有统计学意义,但无显著相关性。在标准PCR分析中,在8个SNAP®4Dx®Plus阳性和阴性样本中均未检测到D. immitis的DNA。repens、reconditum或合并感染也未被PCR检测到。在嗜吞噬细胞芽胞杆菌/嗜吞噬细胞芽胞杆菌阳性的9个样本中。针对16S rRNA和GroEL基因进行巢式和半巢式PCR检测,4个抗体阳性。系统发育分析显示与各种欧洲菌株相似,包括人畜共患菌株。本研究是首次从克罗地亚红狐血液样本中检测到嗜吞噬细胞芽胞杆菌。结果表明,红狐并非没有感染诸如无形体病和二丝虫病等感染,这强调了它们在克罗地亚某些地区维持和传播这些病原体方面可能发挥的作用。这些结果强调需要进一步研究,以便更好地了解红狐在媒介传播疾病传播中的流行病学重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信